View clinical trials related to Distal Radius Fracture.
Filter by:The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of early manual therapy on function, pain, range of motion (ROM), hand and pinch grip strength and disability level in patients underwent volar plating after distal radius fracture (DRF). Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Routin Physiotherapy (RP) or Early Manual Therapy (EMT). While RP group received routine physiotherapy, EMT group received routine physiotherapy plus Mulligan's Mobilization With Movement technique. All treatments were done two sessions a week, through 12 weeks. Function, pain, range of motion (ROM), hand and pinch grip strength and disability level of patients were assessed. Measurements were made at postoperative week 3, 6 and 12.
We plan to compare 2 types of plating systems for volar plating of distal radius fractures (Aptus 2.5® Medartis AG, Basel, Switzerland vs. INTEOS 2.5® - Hofer Medical GmbH and Co KG, Austria) in a prospective single-blinded controlled clinical trial.
Determine efficacy of the use of mini-c-arm fluoroscopy for the closed reduction of isolated distal radius fractures in adult patients in the emergency department setting.
The occurrence of distal radius fractures is well known to be a sentinel event as these fractures are associated with 2 to 4 times increased risk of subsequent hip fractures in elderly patients. Studies have shown a significantly increased degree of postural sway in these patients, which is strongly associated with recurrent falls. The latest Cochrane systematic review also shows a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of current rehabilitation interventions. Low-magnitude high-frequency vibration (LMHFV) is a biophysical intervention that provides non-invasive, systemic mechanical stimulation and has been shown to improve muscle strength and balancing abilities in healthy, independent and active elderly women in our previous clinical study. Our animal studies have also shown LMHFV promoting myogenic proliferation and hypertrophy, muscle contractibility, and increased fast-fiber switching to muscle fiber type IIA.Previous rehabilitation studies have used clinical functional performance tests, which lack sensitivity and specificity in predicting impaired postural control. The Biodex Balance System SD consists of a dynamic balance platform interfaced with computer software, which offers objective and reliable tests for postural stability and fall risk. This study is a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect of 6 months of LMHFV after a distal radius fracture in elderly patients. Patients will be recruited and randomized to control or LMHFV group by envelope drawing of computer-generated random numbers. The intervention group will undergo LMHFV at 35Hz, 0.3g (peak to peak magnitude), displacement of <0.1mm, 20 min/day, at least 3 days/week for 6 months in community centres. Control group will remain in their habitual life style and no vibration used. Outcome assessments will be performed at baseline 0 days, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Outcome assessor and statistician will be blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome is the effect of LMHFV on postural stability. The Biodex Balance System SD is used to measure the static and dynamic ability of the subjects to maintain the center of balance. Secondary outcomes are the occurrence of fall for the patients in both groups, the health-related quality of life (SF-36), and Timed Up and Go test for basic mobility skills.
The investigators will be enrolling children with distal radius buckle fractures, treating them with a removable splint and randomizing them to follow up as needed vs required follow up with a primary care physician 1-2 weeks after the ED visit.
Distal radius fracture (DRF) is a common fracture of which the incidence appears to be increasing worldwide. On average, a total of 17% of all diagnosed fractures are DRF's. In the Dutch guideline for DRF the treatment advice for DRF, without reduction, is treatment with plaster cast or brace for one-three weeks. Despite the advice in the guideline and despite several studies from the 90's showing that plaster cast treatment of a stable DRF for one week is safe, the usual length of plaster cast treatment for stable DRF is four-six weeks. In addition, recent studies have also shown that a long period of immobilization can lead to more post traumatic pain by increasing disuse and kinesiophobia. This evidence suggests that the usual duration (4-6 weeks) of plaster cast treatment for DRF is unnecessary. The aim of this feasibility study is to define whether one week of plaster cast treatment is possible and can lead to better functional results, with at least the same patient satisfaction and complications. In addition, this feasibility study will be used to define the sample size of the future RCT.
A single center, parallel group, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the department of Hand Surgery, ABC (Andre, Bernardo, Caetano) Foundation University Hospital, Santo Andre, Brazil. Two implants used for fixation in closed reduction of distal radius fractures were compared: the bridging dynamic Galaxy Wrist external fixator (Orthofix®, Verona) and the non-bridging Galaxy wrist external fixator system (Orthofix®, Verona).
Wrist (distal radius fractures) are very common injuries. Despite this there is still much controversy about the best way to treat them and in particular which ones require intervention. Many studies have been carried out but there is no strong evidence to answer these questions. The investigators are carrying out a Delphi study which involves seeking consensus from experts at treating these injuries about the best way to manage them. UK and international expert surgeons will take part in three rounds of online questionnaires to help decide how much displacement of the fracture will trigger treatment for different common wrist fracture cases. The aim of the study is to obtain expert opinion through consensus from the expert group about the amount of displacement that is acceptable until intervention is required. This will provide guidance and reduce variation between treating surgeons.
For the non-surgical treatment of distal radius fractures in adults a variety cast options are available, including or not the elbow joint. The literature is inconclusive regarding the need to immobilize the elbow joint after reduction of the distal radius fracture.This study was undertaken to evaluate the best method of immobilization between the above and below-elbow cast groups at the end of 6 months of follow-up.
There is no consensus about the best conservative treatment for patients with dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. The previous studies that have examined the most valid method for cast immobilization have lacked uniform and patient-rated outcome measures, proper randomization and sufficient study population. The aim of this study is to compare functional position cast to flexion-ulnar -deviation with dorsally displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years or older. The conservative treatment is performed in clinical practice by various health care professionals with different techniques of reduction which are not limited to any specific technique in this pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.