Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Palliative Benefit of Involved-site Radiotherapy Following Effective Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced-stage Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Wuhan University Cancer Center - NHL04 Trial
The standard treatment approach for patients with stage III-IV DLBCL is combination chemotherapy. Receipt of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) after effective chemotherapy was associated with improved in-field control and event-free survival. However, it is uncertain for the radiotherapy field size to treat for these patients after chemotherapy. Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) after effective chemotherapy is a common strategy for patients with stage III-IV DLBCL. There is not a clinical trial to research whether the sequential narrowed radiotherapy field size (involved-site radiotherapy, ISRT) can obtain the same efficacy as IFRT and decrease toxicities related to radiotherapy.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Approximately 50% of patients present with stage III-IV disease at diagnosis. The standard
treatment approach for these patients is combination chemotherapy. the role of radiation
therapy (RT) after effective system therapy in stage III-IV DLBCL (advanced-stage DLBCL) is
controversial. The recommended approaches for patients with stage III-IV disease by The
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) are that consolidation RT is managed for
patients who achieved a complete response (CR) to chemotherapy and palliative RT for
patients with partial response (PR) after chemotherapy. However, it is uncertain for the
radiotherapy field size to treat for these patients after chemotherapy.
Some benefits of consolidation RT after chemotherapy exist for patients with advanced-stage
DLBCL. One of the important aims of treatment for these patients is the improvement of
event-free survival (EFS). After patients receive chemotherapy alone, the most common site
of disease recurrence is at sites of initial disease involvement. The complications related
to chemotherapy, including second malignancies and other non-neoplastic late events, were
needed to emphasize for those patients managed with more cycles' regimens alone to increase
the efficacy of patients with advanced-stage DLBCL. Receipt of consolidation RT was
associated with improved in-field control and EFS though no difference in overall survival
(OS) when compared to patients without consolidation RT. Several randomized and
retrospective studies demonstrated that the EFS (even the OS) can be improved by
consolidation RT for patients with advanced-stage DLBCL after CHOP or CHOP-like
chemotherapy. The patients randomized among those diagnosed initially with bulky disease
(>10 cm), those achieving CR or PR after chemotherapy, and even those in stage IV with bone
marrow involved.
The complications related to consolidation RT also need to be additionally explored for
those patients since the efficacy of advanced-stage DLBCL has improved by combined-modality
therapy (CMT). Especially, considerable difficulties in the continuous salvage options are
unavoidable because of the risk of blood cell production disorders associated to
extensive-field radiotherapy. Consolidation involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) after
effective chemotherapy is common palliative strategy for patients with advanced-stage DLBCL.
The morbidity of treatment may be decreased further by RT with the radiation field size
reduction. Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT), based on a modified involved field, aims to
reduce the radiation volume treated and the probability of late effects. Its radiation
targets include a gross tumor volume (GTV), a clinical target volume (CTV), and a planning
target volume (PTV), which were defined in International Commission on Radiation Units and
Measurements Report (ICRU) 50. This is based on defining the site of gross disease before
chemotherapy, the GTV and using a CT-based volume with an expansion to form a CTV in the
cranio-caudal direction. There is not a clinical trial to research whether the sequential
narrowed radiotherapy field size (involved-site radiotherapy, ISRT) can obtain the same
efficacy as IFRT and decrease toxicities related to radiotherapy.
To evaluate the differences between IFRT and ISRT in the efficacy and complications related
to consolidation RT for patients with advanced-stage DLBCL who achieved effective
chemotherapy. The CTV of ISRT is defined as the region including the prechemotherapy volume
of disease with 1.5 cm margin expanded cranio-caudally in the direction of potential
lymphatic spread. The CTV should not extend into air in the transverse plane and should be
limited in the involved lymph node region defined by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B
(CALGB). The PTV is then extended from CTV by adding the necessary margin for setup error
and organ motion.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT01804686 -
A Long-term Extension Study of PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05823701 -
Chidamide, Azacitidine Combined With GM Regimen for Relapsed and Refractory DLBCL Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01691898 -
A Study of Pinatuzumab Vedotin (DCDT2980S) Combined With Rituximab or Polatuzumab Vedotin (DCDS4501A) Combined With Rituximab or Obinutuzumab in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03656835 -
Nanochip Technology in Monitoring Treatment Response and Detecting Relapse in Participants With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02877082 -
Tacrolimus, Bortezomib, & Thymoglobulin in Preventing Low Toxicity GVHD in Donor Blood Stem Cell Transplant Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02060656 -
Phase II Study Comparing LR-GEM to R-GEM-P in Second-line Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (LEGEND)
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01653067 -
STORM: Temsirolimus, Rituximab and DHAP for Relapsed and Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT00846157 -
Biocell Natural Killer Mixture in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00440583 -
The Response Study of Yt90-Zevalin in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma After 6 Cycles of CHOP
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01851551 -
Phase 1/2 Study of VSLI Plus Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory NHL
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04981795 -
realMIND: Observational Study on Safety and Effectiveness of Tafasitamab in Combination With Lenalidomide in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL
|
||
Completed |
NCT01186978 -
Reduced Radiation in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01197560 -
Study of Lenalidomide to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03246906 -
Comparison of Triple GVHD Prophylaxis Regimens for Nonmyeloablative or Reduced Intensity Conditioning Unrelated Mobilized Blood Cell Transplantation
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05990985 -
The Efficacy and Safety of the RCMOP Sequential Therapy as a First-line Treatment for Patients With Intermediate-to-high Risk Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Who Had Incomplete Remission.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02890602 -
Erythropoietin for Management of Anemia Caused by Chemotherapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03630159 -
Study of Tisagenlecleucel in Combination With Pembrolizumab in r/r Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04529772 -
A Combination of Acalabrutinib With R-CHOP in Subjects With Previously Untreated Non-GCB DLBCL (ACE-LY-312)
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02900651 -
Safety and Efficacy of MAK683 in Adult Patients With Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02481310 -
Combination Chemotherapy, Rituximab, and Ixazomib Citrate in Treating Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |