King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

Difficult Intubation Clinical Trial

Official title:

King Vision Video Laryngoscope Versus Glidescope Video Laryngoscope: A Comparative Study in Ambulatory Surgery Center Patients

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02324465
• Other study ID #: 130470
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 2013
• Est. completion date: October 2017

Study information

• Verified date: April 2019
• Source: Vanderbilt University Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The investigators plan to conduct a randomized trial comparing the intubation success rate and time of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope to the Glidescope video laryngoscope in order to demonstrate the comparability of the devices.

Description:

Both the King Vision and Glidescope video laryngoscopes are advanced airway devices that are relatively low cost and are designed to improve the efficiency of both routine and difficult intubation. Both systems use disposable blades, which eliminates the need for blade sterilization and may minimize the risk of infectious exposure to patients and improve cost and efficiency associated with the sterilization processing of non-disposable laryngoscopes. The Glidescope has been commercially available longer than the King Vision, and has been more frequently studied.

Although similar in many respects, the King Vision and Glidescope systems have differing designs which may result in differences in speed and success in the management of routine and/or difficult airways.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 40
• Est. completion date: October 2017
• Est. primary completion date: October 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult patients scheduled for elective, ambulatory surgery requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients who require rapid sequence induction and intubation or fiberoptic intubation.

• Pregnancy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Difficult Intubation

Intervention

Device:
• King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Intubation via King Vision Video Laryngoscope
• Glidescope Video Laryngoscope
Intubation via Glidescope Video Laryngoscope

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Vanderbilt University Medical Center	Nashville	Tennessee

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Vanderbilt University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Number of Participants With Adverse Events	Notation of any injury to lips, teeth, soft tissue.	during and immediately after procedure (approx 180 minutes)
Primary	Time Until Intubation With Each Device	time from the introduction of the laryngoscope into the oral cavity to endotracheal tube reaching the glottic aperture	<100 seconds
Secondary	Mean Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation		<100 seconds
Secondary	Total Number of Assisted Maneuvers Required to Complete Intubation (Includes All Participants in Arm)	Assisted Maneuvers can include laryngeal manipulation, head lift, Backward Upward Rightward Pressure, stylet removed, Cricoid pressure, scope manipulation and bougie.	<100 seconds