Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01612949
Other study ID # IRB00036442
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date May 2012
Est. completion date December 2024

Study information

Verified date December 2023
Source Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Contact Scott Segal, MD, MHCM
Phone (336) 716-7084
Email bsegal@wakehealth.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this project is to develop a computer algorithm that can accurately predict how easy or difficult it is to intubate a patient based upon digital photographs from three different perspectives. Such an application can provide a consistent, quantitative measure of intubation difficulty by analyzing facial features in captured photographs - features which have previously been shown to correlate with how easy or how hard it would be to perform the intubation procedure. This is in contrast to established subjective protocols that also serve to predict intubation difficulty, albeit with lower accuracy. A digital application has the potential to decrease potential complications related to intubation difficulty and increase patient safety.


Description:

Both control and experimental cohorts will be recruited in this study. In order to drive clinical acceptance of this technique, the investigators will need to study and then demonstrate applicability to all patients regardless of race or gender. This will require the recruitment of a control population of patients who have been demonstrated at surgery to be easy to intubate. Such patients are in relative abundance. The experimental group will consist of patients who are found at surgery to be difficult to intubate. In addition, a prospective cohort will be recruited without prior knowledge of ease or difficulty of intubation, and subsequent ground truth determined at surgery. Patients are defined as easy to intubate if their anesthetic record described a single attempt with a Macintosh 3 blade resulting in a grade 1 laryngoscopic view (full exposure of the vocal cords). Difficult intubation was defined by at least one of: more than one attempt by an operator with at least one year of anesthesia experience, grade 3 or 4 laryngoscopic view on a 4 point scale, 5 need for a second operator, or non-elective use of an alternative airway device such as a bougie, fiberoptic bronchoscope or intubating laryngeal mask airway. The primary purpose of the study is to develop algorithms capable of discriminating patients who are likely to be difficult to intubate from those who are likely to be easy to intubate based on facial appearance. The primary analysis is the demonstration of statistical significance in the ability of the derived algorithms to determine successfully whether a subject was easy or difficult to intubate. A secondary analysis is the demonstration of a statistical difference in performance between the derived algorithms versus conventional airway assessment tests. An ongoing modification of the protocol will allow anesthesia personnel to attempt intubation with a Miller (straight) laryngoscope blade, instead of a Macintosh blade. This secondary outcome was chosen because of the strong preference, and in some cases, better skill, with such a blade. It is possible that different facial features will predict difficulty with this blade than has been predicted to date with a Macintosh blade.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 3500
Est. completion date December 2024
Est. primary completion date December 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients requiring endotracheal intubation - Patients consenting to acquisition of photographic images of the head and neck Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who had undergone head or neck surgery - Patients in whom central venous catheters or other interventions that prevent full view of the features of the face in frontal and profile views - Patients who were neither easy nor difficult to intubate by our criteria

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
photographing head and neck
Taking three photographs of head and neck-one photograph from front, one from left and one fron right. The photographs are analyzed by facial structure software to create face model.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (2)

Connor CW, Segal S. Accurate classification of difficult intubation by computerized facial analysis. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):84-93. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820098d6. Epub 2010 Nov 16. — View Citation

Tavolara TE, Gurcan MN, Segal S, Niazi MKK. Identification of difficult to intubate patients from frontal face images using an ensemble of deep learning models. Comput Biol Med. 2021 Sep;136:104737. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104737. Epub 2021 Aug 4. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Computer algorithm to predict difficulty of endotracheal intubation The outcome will be a computer algorithm that can accurately predict how easy or difficult it is to intubate a patient based upon digital photographs from three different perspectives. Such an application can provide a consistent, quantitative measure of intubation difficulty by analyzing facial features in captured photographs-features which have previously been shown to correlate with how easy or how hard it would be to perform the intubation procedure. A digital application has the potential to decrease complications related to intubation difficulty and increase patient safety. Approximately 2 years, based on current enrollment pattern
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03657927 - A Comparison of McGrath MAC Versus C-MAC Videolaryngoscopes in Morbidly Obese Patients N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04506346 - Risk Prediction of Difficult Tracheal Intubation in OSAHS Patient
Completed NCT02944305 - A Predictive Model for Difficult Intubation N/A
Completed NCT02476565 - Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree Via the I-gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme N/A
Completed NCT02823392 - Difficult Bag Mask Ventilation and Difficult Intubation in Children
Completed NCT05347680 - A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain N/A
Completed NCT03265938 - Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Head and Neck Pathology
Completed NCT05545982 - Comparison of Video Laryngoscope Using Miller or Macintosh Approach During Endotracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03320278 - The Evaluation of Simplified Predictive Intubation Difficulty Score.
Completed NCT01532063 - Risk Factors of Difficult Intubation and Related Complications in Adults in Intensive Care Units: FRIDA-Rea N/A
Completed NCT03709524 - Orotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients: A Comparison of Standard Airtraq , Nasotracheal Airtraq Combined With a Stylet Inserted Endotracheal Tube and Standard Airtraq Combined Fiberoptic Intubation N/A
Recruiting NCT03902704 - Safety and Efficacy of Cleverscope. A New Medical Device for Tracheal Intubation N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05607433 - Air Q Laryngeal Airway Versus the AmbuAura Gain as a Conduit for Endotracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT02814266 - Difficult Intubation and Anthropometric Measurement N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04759287 - Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for Awake Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03547193 - Two Neck Ultrasound Measurements as Predictors of Difficult Laryngoscopy
Completed NCT04822831 - The Effect of Semi-recumbent Position With Exercise Training on Long-term Ventilator-dependent Patients N/A
Completed NCT03165461 - Evaluation of the Use of Tracheal Intubation Through a Laryngeal Tube to Intubate Anesthetized Patients
Recruiting NCT02177240 - A Comparison of the Flex-it® to the GlideRite® Stylet for GlideScope® in Simulated Difficult Intubations. N/A
Completed NCT04168840 - Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Difficult Airway