Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02313168
Other study ID # AITT 2014/7
Secondary ID HBR/052/01763-2/
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received December 5, 2014
Last updated March 8, 2017
Start date March 2013
Est. completion date March 2016

Study information

Verified date March 2017
Source University of Debrecen
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The F.R.O.N.T. formula for pre-operative airway assessment and documentation

Background:

Prediction of difficult airway is one of the most important challenges before general anesthesia. Although in recent decades different scoring systems have been for the preoperative assessment of their sensitivity and specificity in predicting a difficult airway remains moderate. Recently, the calculation of composite scores using different formulae has been proposed as the most sensitive one. The aim of the present work was to test the clinical usefulness of the FRONT score, a recently developed scoring system.

Methods:

This study was a multi-center, inter-observer, prospective and double-blind investigation that included 976 patients from two university centers: 250 from the University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania, and 726 from the University of Debrecen, Hungary.

The preoperative evaluation of the patients was performed by a preoperative team of anesthesiologists (team A) who evaluated and scored the expected difficulty of the management of the airway. An intraoperative team of evaluators (team B) working independently from team A, performed the actual instrumentation of the airway and scored the actual findings. Both teams used the FRONT scoring system and worked independently from each other to ensure blinded assessment. Statistical analysis of the preoperative and intraoperative FRONT scores were performed post hoc.


Description:

Criteria for preoperative assessment and grading for all five levels "F" 0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty to be expected

1. Difficulty to apply air tight the facial mask ventilation by one person (difficulty to maintain SpO2 above 92% with 100% O2), or inability to prevent the decrease in SpO2 during facial mask ventilation.

2. Increased ventilation difficulty, requiring the presence of two anesthetists in order to maintain the patient's oxygenation, or inability to ventilate the patient with the facial mask.

"R" 0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty to be expected

1. Incomplete teeth, loose teeth, edentulous status, incisor protrusion, prognathia, micrognathia, limited opening of the mouth but still more than 3 cm., expected difficulty with direct laringoscopy and/or insertion of a supraglottic device.

2. Mobile teeth, mouth opening less than 3 cm, laryngoscopy or insertion of a supraglottic airway device impossible "O"

0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty to be expected

1 Laryngoscopy and intubation difficult expected by intaroral mass, abscess, anatomical anomalies (large tongue) 2 Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation expected to be extremely difficult or impossible "N" 0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty to be expected

1. Reduced mobility of the cervical spine, short neck, bulky chest, special positioning of the patient necessary (roll under the shoulders)

2. Immobile cervical spine "T"

0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty to be expected

1. Expected trouble for passing the tube through the glottis (polyp, tumor, abscess), and tube with smaller diameter necessary

2. Severe obstruction in the upper airway (polyp, tumor, abscess, paralysis of the vocal cords), tracheal stenosis, tracheomalacia

Criteria for intraoperative assessment and grading for all five levels. "F" 0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty

1. Difficulty to seal the face mask accordingly by one person in order to maintain SpO2 above 92% by ventilating with oxygen.

2. Inability to maintain SpO2 above 92% by ventilating with oxygen with handling the face mask by two persons.

"R" 0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty

1. Incomplete dentition, protruding incisives, prognathia, micrognathia, a reduced interincisive gap above 3 cm thus explicitly hampering (but not completely preventing) intubation or supraglottic device insertion.

2. Incomplete dentition, protruding incisives, prognathia, micrognathia, a reduced interincisive gap below 3 cm limiting intubation or supraglottic device insertion.

"O" 0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty

1. Macroglossia, presence of tumours or other findings with increased oral tissue mass, tongue base processes which hamper the performance of direct laryngoscopy (Cormack/Lehane grades up to 3°), conventional intubation or the insertion of a supraglottic airway. Final success could be achieved after two attempts to secure the airway with any adopted technique.

2. Macroglossia, presence of tumours or other findings with increased oral tissue mass, tongue base processes which prevent the performance of direct laryngoscopy (Cormack/Lehane grade 4°), conventional intubation or the insertion of a supraglottic airway. Tracheal intubation could be achieved only after recurring to a visualizing technique (e.g. flexible fiberoptic).

"N" 0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty

1. Reduced cervical spine mobility, short neck, risk of spinal cord damage by certain head positions that hamper direct laryngoscopy and conventional means of tracheal intubation. Successful intubation possible by 2 or more attempts. Supraglottic airway insertion is not affected.

2. Reduced cervical spine mobility, short neck, risk of spinal cord damage by certain head positions that prevent direct laryngoscopy and conventional means of tracheal intubation. Tracheal intubation could be achieved only after recurring to a visualizing technique (e.g. flexible fiberoptic). Supraglottic airway insertion may have been affected.

"T" 0 Normal level of difficulty or no difficulty

1. Difficult forwarding of a tracheal tube with regular diameter to a mid-tracheal position. Supraglottic airway insertion is not affected.

2. Impossible forwarding of a tracheal tube even with a reduced diameter to a mid-tracheal position. Supraglottic airway insertion is not affected but ventilation is difficult or impossible. Necessity to apply jet ventilation or to bypass the oro-tracheal route by performing a trans-tracheal access.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 1150
Est. completion date March 2016
Est. primary completion date March 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18 years or older going to be intubated for general anesthesia for elective operation

Exclusion Criteria:

age under 18 years

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
observation, inspection


Locations

Country Name City State
Hungary Hungary University of Debrecen Debrecen Hajdú-Bihar

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Debrecen Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Zurich

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Hungary, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Correlation between the preoperative and the intraoperative FRONT scores. The preoperative evaluation of the patients was performed by a preoperative team of anesthesiologists (team A) who evaluated and scored the expected difficulty of the management of the airway. An intraoperative team of evaluators (team B) working independently from team A, performed the actual instrumentation of the airway and scored the actual findings. Both teams used the FRONT scoring system and worked independently from each other to ensure blinded assessment. Statistical analysis of the preoperative and intraoperative FRONT scores will be performed post hoc. (correlation analysis) 2 weeks (between the preop. anesthesiological examination and the operation)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05347121 - Difficult Airway and Ultrasonographic Evaluation
Completed NCT05519358 - Midsagittal Tongue Measurement to Predict Difficult Airways
Completed NCT01328405 - Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Proseal Phase 4
Completed NCT01100957 - Evaluation of the Single Use Flexible Optical Scope Versus Multiple Use Flexible Optical Scopes for Intubation N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03125837 - Establishment of Airway Database for Surgical Patients N/A
Completed NCT01632683 - STorz Against Glidescope Effectiveness N/A
Completed NCT05327842 - Evaluation of a Flexible Videoscope Training Simulator N/A
Withdrawn NCT03313947 - Airway Ultrasound Prediction and Correlation N/A
Recruiting NCT06183060 - Study on the Decision Support System of Difficult Airway Evaluation
Completed NCT02979171 - Comparison in Difficult Airway Scenario Induced in Patients With Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Classic™, LMA™ - Flexible and LMA - Proseal™ Phase 4
Completed NCT00500916 - Different Techniques for Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Patients With Difficult Airway N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05736198 - Comparison of Two Sedation Regimens for Awake Fiberoptic Intubation
Completed NCT05414214 - Thyromental Height Test Versus Sternomental Displacement in Elderly
Recruiting NCT04458220 - Research on Early Warning and Solution System of Difficult Airway in Perioperative Period Based on Artificial Intelligence
Recruiting NCT02811562 - Learning Curves of Intubation for Simulated Difficult Airway Scenarios by Manikin: Comparison of Combined Pentax Airwayscope-fiberoptic Bronchoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope Alone N/A
Completed NCT04005950 - Comparison of a Conventional and a Realistic Self-modified Model
Active, not recruiting NCT01185535 - Effects of Topical Anesthesia With Pressure Nebulized 2% Lidocaine During Awake Intubation Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06000267 - Incidence and Contributing Anthropometric Factors of Difficult Airway in Pediatric Surgical Patients
Completed NCT03404453 - Difficult Airway Prediction in Paediatric Anaesthesia
Completed NCT01664234 - Oxygen Insuflation and ArterialDesaturation During Tracheal Intubation in Children N/A