View clinical trials related to Diet Quality.
Filter by:The overall objective of this application is to pilot test an mHealth nutrition intervention within pediatric clinics serving Latino families and evaluate its potential for implementation. The investigators hypothesize the intervention will improve child diet quality and will be feasible for use within the clinic setting. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will pursue 3 specific aims and 1 exploratory aim: 1. Aim 1: Pilot Nutricity with 40 Latino families (English or Spanish speaking) vs. 40 waitlist control in primary care clinics and estimate differences in child diet quality at 3 month's post Nutricity exposure. Preliminary data will inform power calculations for a future larger Nutricity intervention. 2. Aim 2: Evaluate other individual (dyad) level factors including reach, engagement, and changes in secondary effectiveness outcomes (e.g. nutrition literacy, BMI, skin carotenoid, psychosocial constructs) at 3 months post exposure. 3. Aim 3: Evaluate organizational-level factors (adoption, implementation, and organizational-level maintenance) in Latino-serving pediatric clinics that may support or inhibit future uptake of Nutricity. The investigators will seek to understand the context of interventions and scalability to other clinics using mixed methods. 4. Exploratory Aim 1: Explore the relationship among nutrition literacy, psychosocial constructs and diet quality outcomes; and explore how engagement and satisfaction influence outcomes.
This study aims to use the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to build and optimize a multicomponent intervention that improves diet quality. The investigators have evaluated the effects of evidence-based public health interventions on consumers' diet quality via a web-based grocery store "NUSMart" as part of Aim 1 of this study. Considering that the goal is to identify promising interventions that may optimize online grocery platforms, the investigators used Aim 1's results to assemble a multicomponent intervention that would significantly affect diet quality: a combination of three behavioral nudges that include food labels & real-time feedback, ordering, and healthier substitute offers (a subset of the interventions examined in Aim 1). Aim 2 study aims to rigorously evaluate this multicomponent intervention.
Mexico is going through a major environmental and nutritional crisis, which is related to unsustainable dietary behaviors. Sustainable diets could solve both problems together. However, in Mexico and the world, an intervention program oriented to promoting sustainable diets has not been designed. This study protocol aims to design a 3-stages, 15 weeks, sustainable-psycho-nutritional digital intervention program whose objective is to promote the adherence of the Mexican population to a sustainable diet and to evaluate its effects on dietary water and carbon footprints, metabolic biomarkers, and gut microbiota of this population. The behavior change wheel model and the guide for digital interventions design will be followed. In stage 1, the program will be designed using the sustainable diets model, and the behavior change wheel model. A sustainable food guide, sustainable recipes, and food plans as well as a mobile application will be developed. In stage 2, the intervention will be carried out for 7 weeks, and a follow-up period of 7 weeks, in a sample of Mexican young adults (18 to 35 years) randomly divided into an experimental group (n=50) and a control group (n=50). The nutritional care process model will be used. Anthropometric, biochemical, clinical, dietary, environmental, socioeconomic level and cultural aspects, nutritional-sustainable knowledge, behavioral aspects, and physical activity will be considered. Thirteen behavioral objectives will be included using successive approaches in online workshops twice a week. The population will be monitored using the mobile application that will include behavioral change techniques. In stage 3, the effects of the intervention will be assessed on the dietary water and carbon footprint, lipid profile, serum glucose, and gut microbiota composition of the evaluated population. It is expected to find improvements in health outcomes and a decrease in dietary water and carbon footprints. With this study, the first theoretical-methodological approach to the sustainable-psycho-nutrition approach will be generated.
This study aims to use a three-arm randomized control trial (RCT) implemented in a fully functional experimental online grocery store, to explore the effects of two low-cost information and incentive-based strategies. These strategies comprise of injunctive norm-based messaging and the use of financial incentive leveraging on loss aversion to encourage the purchase of healthy foods. The investigators have set up a store wherein products may be purchased by participants and subsequently delivered to homes in some of the conditions. This increases the external validity of these interventions and enables investigators to establish greater confidence in their generalizability.
Purpose: Compare the efficacy of two 3-month Internet-based interventions that use a simplified strategy for monitoring of dietary intake among young adult men and women with overweight or obesity. Participants: Young adult men and women who are between the ages of 18-35 years (N=75) and who currently have overweight or obesity (BMI between 25 and 50 kg/m^2). Procedures (methods): This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of two Internet-based dietary interventions among 75 young adult men and women who currently have overweight or obesity. Both interventions will use simplified monitoring of dietary intake using an approach based on the Traffic Light Diet. One intervention will target a reduction in intake of red foods (high-calorie, high-fat foods) and tracking of red foods in the study website. The other intervention will target an increase in intake of green foods (low-calorie, healthy foods) and tracking of green foods in the study website. Components of both interventions include (1) personalized goals for red/green food intake, (2) weekly tailored feedback, and (3) weekly lessons delivered via smartphone.
This study aims to systematically evaluate the effect of Singapore's new front-of-pack non-alcoholic beverage labels, called Nutri-Grade, on the consumption of processed beverages. Using a fully functional grocery webstore, the investigators wish to assess the causal effect of the new labels on food and beverage purchase, sugar intake, and overall diet quality and examine how this effect varies by shoppers' income and education level. The investigators' hypotheses about the effects of these new food labels, measured by the grams of sugar per serving (primary) of finalized shopping baskets, are as follows: 1. Hypotheses 1: The new sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) labels will shift consumers toward healthier products. Sugar-sweetened beverages are any liquids that have been sweetened with one or more of the different forms of added sugars. 2. Hypotheses 2: The new SSB labels will reduce overall sugar and calories purchased and increase overall diet quality. 3. Hypotheses 3: Effects will be greater for those with low income/low education as they are least familiar with the nutrition facts panel and thus most likely to benefit from the new information.
Using a 3-arm randomized controlled trial, the investigators aim to rigorously evaluate the effects of two front-of-pack (FOP) food labels on diet quality. The first food label is a modified version of Chilean warning FOP label and the second food label is a modified version of French FOP label, Nutri-Score. The investigators used an experimental online grocery store, called NUSMart, which is similar in design to commercial web-based grocery stores to test these two FOP labels. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the following arms and asked to complete a one-time hypothetical shop. Arm 1: Participants experienced a default version of NUSMart which replicated the traditional shopping experience of online grocery stores with no FOP labels (Control). Arm 2: Same as Arm 1 NUSMart except that Chilean warning FOP labels were displayed on less healthy food and beverages. Products with specific nutrients (i.e. sugar, sodium, saturated fat, energy) falling outside the bounds of the thresholds defined by the Chilean warning labels were depicted with the warning labels on them. Arm 3: Same as Arm 1 NUSMart except that Nutri-Score FOP labels along with % sugar per serving were displayed on all food and beverages. These labels score products on the basis of 7 nutrients (calories, saturated fats, sugar, salt, fibre, protein and percentage of fruits, vegetables and nuts) from A to E (best to worst). To ensure that participants understood what Nutri-Score labels mean and how they work, an introductory video was shown before shopping. The investigators hypothesize the following: Hypothesis 1: Diet quality, as measured by weighted average Nutri-Score point of shoppers' final baskets, will be greatest in Arm 3, followed by Arm 2, followed by Control. Hypothesis 2: Grams of sugar per serving/ milligrams of sodium per serving/ grams of saturated fat per serving/ calories per serving will be least in Arm 2, followed by Arm 3, followed by Control.
The majority of older Veterans do not meet the minimum healthy diet or physical activity recommendations, despite known benefits. Identifying novel ways to increase adherence to rehabilitation programs that improve dietary quality and physical activity may reduce the risk of disability in older Veterans. Peer-based interventions may be one method to facilitate lasting behavioral change since peers often share a common culture and knowledge about the problems that their community experiences. The investigators propose to develop and evaluate a novel peer-led diet and exercise intervention that targets older Veterans with multiple chronic health conditions. Successful development and pilot of this intervention will provide the preliminary data for a larger multisite trial focused on the use of peer-led interventions to improve long-term compliance to lifestyle interventions in older Veterans.
A parallel, single-blinded, multi-centre randomized controlled trial conducted at the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) and the Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research (MMIHR; Australian Catholic University), by researchers from the University of Adelaide, Australian Catholic University and La Trobe University.
This study aims to use the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to build and optimize a multi-component intervention that improves diet quality. The investigators will evaluate the effects of evidence-based public health interventions on consumers' diet quality via a web-based grocery store "NUSMart" and then identify a multi-component intervention that includes only those interventions meaningfully affecting diet quality.