Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05351801
Other study ID # NURP-002-20F
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date June 21, 2023
Est. completion date June 30, 2027

Study information

Verified date December 2023
Source VA Office of Research and Development
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Veterans with diabetes are more likely than diabetic civilians to develop disabling chronic diabetic neuropathic pain (CDNP). Research on frontline treatments for CDNP (enhanced glycemic control, exercise, pharmacological agents), shows inconsistent outcomes and dissatisfaction among Veterans. Veterans and clinicians have shown significant interest in cannabis derivatives (THC, CBD) for neuropathic pain control, but there are no well-controlled trials guiding expectations for benefit and adverse outcomes associated with cannabis for CDNP. Because Veterans are likely to present with pain and pain-related polymorbidity significantly differing from that of civilians, a well-structured clinical trial of cannabinoids for Veterans with CDNP is vital. The present phase II study will offer the first evidence describing the potential benefits and adverse effects of cannabinoids for CDNP in Veterans using a four-arm, double-blind, multisite randomized trial comparing THC, CBD, THC+CBD and placebo on neuropathic pain outcomes.


Description:

Chronic pain is a significant burden to United States Veterans and is a particular concern for Veterans with diabetes. Diabetic Veterans have a higher risk of chronic diabetic neuropathic pain (CDNP) than civilians with diabetes, and CDNP is more disabling for Veterans than it is for civilians. Frontline treatment for CDNP, including enhanced glycemic control, exercise, and pharmacotherapies, show inconsistent outcomes for individuals with CDNP due to poor adherence and side effects. The ongoing opioid crisis has led to significant interest in safe and effective alternatives for pain control, and there is a significant need for research on desirable options for pain control that are likely to improve treatment adherence and outcomes. Veterans groups and Veterans Affairs clinicians have expressed significant interest in cannabis and its principal constituents (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, THC; cannabidiol, CBD) for pain management, but the extant research describing the potential risks and benefits of cannabis for pain is weak. This randomized trial was developed as a proof of concept study to determine if cannabis constituents (THC, CBD, and THC+CBD) are superior to placebo in reducing pain in Veterans with CDNP. The study is to recruit a sample of 320 adult Veterans who meet diagnostic criteria for high-impact CDNP, are on stable treatment(s) for CDNP, are not current cannabis users and who do not meet diagnostic criteria for Cannabis Use Disorder. This randomized phase II, 4-arm clinical trial aims to determine if cannabis constituents (THC, CBD) or their combination (THC+CBD) are superior to placebo in reducing pain in Veterans with CDNP. This trial will offer the first evidence describing the potential benefits and adverse effects of cannabinoids for CDNP in Veterans.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 21
Est. completion date June 30, 2027
Est. primary completion date June 30, 2027
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 21 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Able to provide written consent - Veterans 21 years and older at the date of screening - Meet NEURODIAB criteria for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy - Meet criteria for persistent, high-impact pain criteria. - Presence of allodynia confirmed by one of the screening dynamic brush tests Exclusion Criteria: - Diabetic neuropathy is not a primary source of neuropathic pain - Hypersensitivity to THC, CBD, or THC/CBD - Self-report of cannabis use during screening phase confirmed by positive urine toxicology for THC-COOH as measured and resulted at visit 5 before randomization - Unwilling to refrain from using cannabis or cannabis-based products through the entire duration of the study - Diagnosis of DSM-5 Cannabis Use Disorder in the past 6 months - Current DSM-5 diagnosis of cannabis use disorder, substance use disorder or serious psychiatric disorders - Actual change or intent to change is greater than a 20% change (increase or decrease) in any other medication for pain or non-pharmacological treatment from 4 weeks before the screening appointment until completion of study (i.e., visit 13) - Opioid doses > 400 mg MME (morphine milligram equivalent) - Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or who intend to become pregnant in the 12 weeks from enrollment - Any current unstable or concerning medical condition that would place the patient at increased risk, including hepatic, respiratory, immunological, cardiovascular, endocrine, or renal disease, or in the opinion of the investigator, prevents adherence with the protocol - Need for immediate psychiatric hospitalization - Enrolled in a medical marijuana program - Federal employee

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
THC (Dronabinol)
Participants will receive a target dose of 10mg per day of THC (Dronabinol).
CBD (Epidolex)
Participants will receive a target dose of 800 mg per day of CBD (Epidolex).
THC + CBD (Nabiximols)
Participants will receive a target dose of 10.8 mg / 10 mg per day of THC + CBD (Nabiximols).
Placebo
Placebo

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI Providence Rhode Island
United States South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX San Antonio Texas
United States VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA San Diego California
United States VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA Seattle Washington
United States VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT West Haven Connecticut

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
VA Office of Research and Development

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary To compare the short-term efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo on Neuropathic Pain as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale of Pain The mean change in the weekly average of daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score (0-10 scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain) from baseline to week 6. Baseline, Week 6
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in pain quality (allodynia) as measured by the Quantitative Sensory Testing. Allodynia measured by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) (0-10 scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain) Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in disability and function as measured by the Neuropathic Pain Scale. Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) total score; 7 different questions/sensations (for each individual item 0-10 scale; 0= not present/no pain, 10= most sensation). Individual scores analyzed separately for pain quality and mean score analyzed for overall neuropathic pain). Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in disability and function as measured by the Gait Speed Test Distance walked (meters)/time (seconds) measured by Gait Speed Test (lower score = worse, higher score =better) Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in perceived improvement as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) 1-7 point ordinal scale assessed (1 = worse, 7 = better) Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in perceived improvement as measured by the patient satisfaction visual analog scale. Patient satisfaction with intervention on visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100, 0=no satisfaction, 100 = complete satisfaction). Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in quality of life measured by the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Mental Component Score (MCS) and Physical Component Score (PCS) measured by Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12). VR-12 is an algorithmic score with ranges from 0-100 (0 indicates worse health-related quality of life and 100 represents better health-related quality of life). Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in anxiety measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Generalized anxiety symptomology is measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) total score. (total score ranges from 0-21; Score 0-4 = minimal anxiety, Score 5-9 = mild anxiety, Score 10-14 = moderate anxiety, Score 15-21 = severe anxiety) Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in pain quality as measured by the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) total score and four subscales (continuous pain, intermittent pain, predominantly neuropathic pain, affective). (0= no pain to 5= excruciating pain) Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in disability and function as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (BPI-DPN) pain intensity score (first four items 0-10; 10= pain as bad as can imagine) (remaining items 0% (no relief)-100% (complete relief)) and pain interference score (0-10, 10= completely intense). Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in emotional functioning (severity of depression) as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Severity of depression is measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score (0-27; 0=none, 27=worst). Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Secondary To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in emotional functioning (PTSD symptoms) as measured by the PTSD Checklist-DSM-5 (PCL-5). PTSD symptoms are assessed by PTSD Checklist-DSM-5 (PCL-5) total score symptom severity score (0-80; 0= not at all to 80= worst). Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02783469 - Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (DOLORisk Dundee)
Completed NCT05563454 - A Study to Learn How Safe the Study Treatment BAY2395840 is, How it Affects the Body and How it Moves Into, Through, and Out of the Body if Given in Single and in Repetitive Doses to Japanese Healthy Male Participants Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT04137328 - Clinical Study on the Improvement of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain by Liraglutide N/A
Completed NCT00548925 - A Safety and Efficacy Study in Subjects With Diabetic Neuropathic Pain Phase 2
Completed NCT00452777 - Efficacy and Tolerability of Novel A2A Agonist in Treatment of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT05406219 - A Study to Learn How the Study Treatment BAY2395840 Moves Into, Through and Out of the Body, How Safe it is, and How it Affects the Body in Participants With Moderate Reduced Kidney Function and in Healthy Male and Female Participants With Normal Kidney Function Phase 1
Completed NCT04454424 - Study on the Safety of BAY1817080, How it is Tolerated and the Way the Body Absorbs, Distributes and Gets Rid of the Study Drug in Participants With Impaired Liver Function or Normal Liver Function Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05986292 - A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain Phase 2
Terminated NCT00619983 - Three Way Interaction Between Gabapentin, Duloxetine, and Donepezil in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy Phase 4
Completed NCT04265781 - Study on the Safety of Drug BAY1817080 at Different Doses and the Way the Body Absorbs and Eliminates the Drug in Japanese Healthy Adult Male Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT06336486 - the Effectiveness of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression on Neuropathic Pain in Patients With Diabetic Polyneuropathy N/A
Completed NCT04487431 - A Trial to Learn How a New Liquid Form of BAY1817080 is Tolerated and Taken up by the Body of Healthy Male Participants (Part A). By Labeling BAY1817080 With a Radioactive Substance (Carbon 14) Researchers Want to Learn How the Study Drug is Processed and Excreted by the Body After Dosing (Part B) Phase 1
Completed NCT04471337 - Study on the Safety of BAY1817080 How it is Tolerated and the Way the Body Absorbs, Distributes and Gets Rid of the Study Drug Given to Participants With Moderate Renal Impairment and End Stage Renal Disease Requiring Dialysis Compared With Matched Participants With Normal Renal Function Phase 1
Terminated NCT01579279 - A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-652 to Placebo in Subjects With Diabetic Neuropathic Pain Phase 2
Completed NCT01589432 - A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Study of the Electric Current Effects of ABT-639 on the Spontaneous Activity of Pain Sensory Receptors in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Phase 2
Completed NCT01345045 - A Multicenter Study Comparing the Analgesic Effects and Safety of ABT-639 Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Diabetic Neuropathic Pain Phase 2