Diabetic Macular Edema Clinical Trial
— MiDME2Official title:
A Pilot Phase I/II Study for the Evaluation of Dextromethorphan as a Microglia Inhibitor in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema (MiDME2)
Verified date | January 2017 |
Source | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Background: Many people with diabetes have macular edema (swelling) at the back of the eye.
Macular edema can cause loss of vision. Studies suggest that inflammation may be involved in
the swelling. A drug called dextromethorphan may help prevent the inflammation and the
swelling. Dextromethorphan is approved for use as a cough medicine, but it has not been
studied to see if it can help in diabetic macular edema.
Objectives: To see if dextromethorphan can help treat diabetic macular edema.
Eligibility: Individuals at least 18 years of age who have diabetic macular edema in at least
one eye.
Design:
- This study lasts 2 years, and will require at least 14 visits to the National Eye
Institute outpatient clinic. Study visits will be every month for the first 2 months and
then every other month. Each visit will take about 2 to 4 hours.
- Participants will be screened with a physical exam, medical history, eye exam, and blood
tests. One eye with macular edema will be chosen as the study eye for testing.
- Participants will take dextromethorphan twice a day, about 12 hours apart, for 2 years.
A study diary will help keep track of the date, time, and number of pills taken.
- Participants will have study visits once a month for the first 2 months and then every
other month for the rest of the study. Each study visit will involve eye exams and blood
and urine tests.
- Four months after starting the study medication, participants may have laser surgery or
other treatments for the macular edema, if it is needed.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 7 |
Est. completion date | December 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria 1. Participant is 18 years of age or older. 2. Participant must understand and sign the protocol's informed consent document. 3. Female participants of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breast-feeding, must have a negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to initiation of study medication and must be willing to undergo urine pregnancy tests throughout the study. 4. Female participants of childbearing potential and male participants able to father children must have (or have a partner who has) had a hysterectomy or vasectomy, be completely abstinent from intercourse or must agree to practice two acceptable methods of contraception throughout the course of the study and for one week after study medication discontinuation. Acceptable methods of contraception include: - hormonal contraception (i.e., birth control pills, injected hormones, dermal patch or vaginal ring), - intrauterine device, - barrier methods (diaphragm, condom) with spermicide, or - surgical sterilization (hysterectomy or tubal ligation). 5. Participant must agree to notify the study investigator or coordinator if any of his/her doctors initiate a new medication during the course of this study. 6. Participant must agree not to take medications containing dextromethorphan during the course of this study. 7. Participant must have normal renal function and liver function, or have mild abnormalities no greater than grade 1 as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE). 8. Participant has a diagnosis of diabetic mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present: - Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes; - Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes; - Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association (ADA) and/or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. 9. Participant has documented hemoglobin A1C 12% or less within one month of baseline. - Participants with elevated hemoglobin A1C but within the 12% or less cutoff will undergo appropriate evaluation, and unstable patients will be excluded according to the investigator's best medical judgment. - Participant agrees to refrain from consuming grapefruit juice, grapefruits and Seville oranges at any time while s/he is enrolled in this study. 10. Participant has at least one eye that meets the study eye criteria listed below. Exclusion Criteria 1. Participant is in another investigational study and actively receiving another study medication for diabetic macular edema (DME). 2. Participant is unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits. 3. Participant has a known hypersensitivity to sodium fluorescein dye. 4. Participant has a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control). • Patients in poor glycemic control who, within the last four months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next four months should not be enrolled. 5. Participant has a history of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant. 6. Participant has a history of hepatitis or liver failure. 7. Participant has an allergy or hypersensitivity to dextromethorphan or levorphanol. 8. Participant is taking or has taken within the last 14 days any medication that could adversely interact with dextromethorphan such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) including but not limited to the following: almotriptan; amitriptyline; amoxapine; bromocriptine; buspirone; cabergoline; citalopram; clomipramine; desipramine; desvenlafaxine; dihydroergotamine; doxepin; duloxetine; eletriptan; ergoloid mesylates; ergotamine; escitalopram; fluoxetine; fluvoxamine; frovatriptan; imipramine; isocarboxazid; linezolid; lithium; maprotiline; meperidine; methylergonovine; milnacipran; mirtazapine; moclobemide; naratriptan; nefazodone; nortriptyline; paroxetine; phenelzine; procarbazine; promethazine; protriptyline; rasagiline; rizatriptan; SAMe (S-adenosylmethionine); selegiline; sertraline; sibutramine; St. Johns wort; sumatriptan; tapentadol; tramadol; tranylcypromine; trazodone; trimipramine; tryptophan; venlafaxine; vilazodone; zolmitriptan. 9. Participant has a blood pressure of > 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110). • If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, a patient can become eligible. 10. Participant has a history of treatment with systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents or steroids within three months prior to study entry. Study Eye Inclusion Criteria 1. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score of 34 letters or better (i.e., 20/200 or better). 2. Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema, based on clinical examination, that is not refractory to further therapy as based on the investigator's clinical judgment. 3. Retinal thickening due to DME within 3000 µm of the center of the macula, as measured by Spectral optical coherence tomography (OCT). 4. Media clarity, pupillary dilation and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs. Study Eye Exclusion Criteria 1. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema. An eye should not be considered eligible if: - The macular edema is considered to be related to cataract extraction; or - Clinical exam and/or OCT suggest that vitreoretinal interface disease (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) is the primary cause of the macular edema. 2. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hard exudates, non-retinal condition). 3. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetic retinopathy (DR) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.). 4. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by three lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal). 5. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within four months prior to study entry. 6. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy within six months prior to study entry. 7. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within three months prior to study entry. 8. History of Yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) capsulotomy performed within two months prior to study entry. 9. History of treatment within three months prior to enrollment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry, such as intravitreal or periocular steroids or intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. Choice of Study Eye in Cases of Bilateral Disease If both eyes of a participant meet the criteria described above, the following will be used to determine the study eye: 1. If one eye is treatment-naïve and the other is not, the treatment-naïve eye will be chosen as the study eye. 2. If both eyes are treatment-naïve, the eye with the better visual acuity will be chosen as the study eye. 3. If both eyes are treatment-naïve and are equivalent, the choice of study eye will be determined at the investigator's discretion after consultation with the participant. 4. If both eyes have been previously treated, the choice of study eye will be determined at the investigator's discretion after consultation with the participant. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike | Bethesda | Maryland |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
National Eye Institute (NEI) | The Emmes Company, LLC |
United States,
Ferris FL 3rd, Patz A. Macular edema: a major complication of diabetic retinopathy. Trans New Orleans Acad Ophthalmol. 1983;31:307-16. — View Citation
Kempen JH, O'Colmain BJ, Leske MC, Haffner SM, Klein R, Moss SE, Taylor HR, Hamman RF; Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):552-63. — View Citation
Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1984 Dec;91(12):1464-74. — View Citation
Valent DJ, Wong WT, Chew EY, Cukras CA. Oral Dextromethorphan for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Results From a Phase I/II Clinical Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Dec 17;7(6):24. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.6.24. eCollection 2018 Nov. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to Baseline | Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria. The eye not chosen as the study eye is referred to as the "fellow eye." | Baseline and 6 months | |
Secondary | Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to Baseline | Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid. | Baseline and 12 Months | |
Secondary | Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to Baseline | Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid. | Baseline and 18 Months | |
Secondary | Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid. | Baseline and 24 Months | |
Secondary | Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to Baseline | Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. | Baseline and 6 Months | |
Secondary | Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to Baseline | Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. | Baseline and 12 Months | |
Secondary | Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to Baseline | Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. | Baseline and 18 Months | |
Secondary | Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20. | Baseline and 24 Months | |
Secondary | Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 6 Months Compared to Baseline | Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD). | Baseline and 6 Months | |
Secondary | Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 12 Months Compared to Baseline | Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD). | Baseline and 12 Months | |
Secondary | Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 18 Months Compared to Baseline | Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD). | Baseline and 18 Months | |
Secondary | Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD). | Baseline and 24 Months | |
Secondary | Changes in Mean Macular Sensitivity in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to Baseline | Microperimetry was used to assess macular sensitivity. | Baseline and 6 Months | |
Secondary | Changes in Mean Macular Sensitivity in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to Baseline | Microperimetry was used to assess macular sensitivity. | Baseline and 12 Months | |
Secondary | Changes in Mean Macular Sensitivity in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to Baseline | Microperimetry was used to assess macular sensitivity. | Baseline and 18 Months | |
Secondary | Changes in Mean Macular Sensitivity in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to Baseline | Microperimetry was used to assess macular sensitivity. | Baseline and 24 Months | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Withdrawn From the Study Therapy Due to Vision Loss or Adverse Events | Duration of the study, up to 24 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03953807 -
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of OZURDEX® in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema But Never Treated
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03622580 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab (RO6867461) in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (YOSEMITE)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06262737 -
Single-center Study Measuring OSDI Dry Eye Score in Patients Undergoing an Anti-VEGF Induction Protocol
|
||
Terminated |
NCT04603937 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT04611152 -
A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
|
Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04108156 -
This Study Will Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema Compared With Intravitreal Ranibizumab
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02867735 -
A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Activity of Intravitreal LKA651 in Patients With Macular Edema
|
Phase 1 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03629210 -
Combination OZURDEX® & EyLea® vs. OZURDEX® Monotherapy in IncompLete-Responders wIth Diabetic Macular Edema
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02842541 -
Safety Study of Intravitreal EBI-031 Given as a Single or Repeat Injection to Subjects With Diabetic Macular Edema
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02221453 -
Cytokine Levels in Patients With Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema Treated With Triamcinolone Acetonide
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02556723 -
Intravitreal Injections of Ziv-aflibercept for Macular Diseases
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02979665 -
Changes to the Retina Following Anti-VEGF Treatments for Diabetic Macular Edema
|
||
Completed |
NCT02000102 -
Outcomes of Diabetic Macula Edema Patients Switched to Aflibercept From Bevacizumab and/or Ranibizumab
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02088229 -
Relating Retinal Structural and Functional Parameters to Visual Acuity in Eyes Undergoing Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00779142 -
Utility of Intravitreal Methotrexate in Diabetic Macular Edema Resistant to Conventional Therapies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01171976 -
Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab in Two "Treat and Extend" Treatment Algorithms Versus Ranibizumab As Needed in Patients With Macular Edema and Visual Impairment Secondary to Diabetes Mellitus
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00989989 -
Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab (Intravitreal Injections) in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01259609 -
Changes in Ciliary Body Thickness in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema After Vitrectomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00683176 -
Effect of Choline Fenofibrate (SLV348) on Macular Edema
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00768040 -
Efficacy of Aliskiren in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema
|
Phase 2 |