View clinical trials related to Diabetic Macular Edema.
Filter by:The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of APX3330 to treat diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME).
This Study (AFIL-IJZ-3002) is designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and immunogenicity of MYL-1701P among a group of participants successfully completing MYL-1701P-3001 study.
This was an open-label, multi-center, FIH study with a single ascending dose (SAD) design that assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single IVT dose of MHU650 in up to 24 participants with macular edema.
DMO is the most common cause of visual loss in people with diabetes. Regular injections of bevacizumab (Avastin) given as frequently as every month remain the current standard of care for centre-involving DMO; however, this regimen is impractical for many Aboriginal patients. Using Ozurdex implants every 3-6 months could be as effective as the currently used Avastin injections. In order to address this real-world problem, this study seeks to investigate whether it is possible to safely use a long-acting steroid preparation such as the dexamethasone IVT implant (Ozurdex) to manage DMO in Aboriginal patients living in Western Australia.
This is an exploratory, prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, interventional, Phase IIb study designed to explore the associations over time between clinical assessments, multimodal imaging assessments, aqueous humor (AH) biomarker patterns, and genetic polymorphisms in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME) who are treated with faricimab.
This first in human (FIH), Phase Ib/II study of EXN407 is a randomised, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, multiple dose, dose-escalating study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of EXN407 in subjects with centre involved Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO), with Centre-subfield macular thickness (CMT) between 280-420 µm and Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) better than or equal to 69 ETDRS score (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/40 (6/12 letters) in the study eye, which is considered secondary to diabetes mellitus. This study will provide a basis for further clinical development of EXN407 ophthalmic solution.
Brief Summary: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of visual impairment and has major public health implications globally and especially in countries such as India where the prevalence of diabetes is high. With timely screening and intervention, the disease progression to blindness can be prevented but several barriers exist to the provision of care. The long term aim is to identify the barriers to DR screening and to plan potential interventional strategies. From the qualitative study, the reasons such as lack of awareness or knowledge, distance to travel, lack of reminder system were identified as a reason for poor follow-up. This lead to the development of interventional strategies. This was a randomized, investigator-masked clinical trial that was conducted in a tertiary eye care centre in South India. Consecutive patients with diabetes who were residents in Chennai and its vicinity of approximately 100 km radius and who were undergoing repeated intravitreal injections for DME were recruited into the trial. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of SMS informational reminders among patients with Diabetic macular edema for the follow-up. They study consists of 2 groups, SMS reminder group receives the reminders 1 week and 2 days prior to the scheduled appointments with the concerned doctor on a particular date and time, whereas other group does not receive any reminders for the appointment schedule. After the follow-up, the patients will be screened for the attendance at the review visit.
A study to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a single intravitreal injection of UBX1325 in patients diagnosed with diabetic macular edema (DME) or neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Part A of the study is conducted to select the THR-149 dose level. Part B of the study is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the selected dose level compared to aflibercept, up to Month 3. As from Month 3, in about half of the subjects, the effect of a single flip-over injection (aflibercept or THR-149) will be evaluated when administered 1 month after the 3 monthly injections of THR-149 or aflibercept. In the other subjects, the durability of 3 monthly injections of THR 149 or aflibercept will be evaluated.
The study will evaluate the safety of ophthalmic bevacizumab in subjects diagnosed with a retinal condition that would benefit from treatment with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, including: exudative age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, or branch retinal vein occlusion.