View clinical trials related to Diabetic Macular Edema.
Filter by:Ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography can detect the response of anti VGEF therapy such as Avastin on retinal ischemia in the setting of diabetic macular edema.
This longitudinal interventional case series will utilize the patients at the University of Michigan W.K. Kellogg Eye Center scheduled to begin treatment for diabetic macular edema. Baseline measures will be taken which include structural assessments such as circulatory capacity utilizing fluorescein angiography, in addition to retinal layer integrity and thickness using high resolution optical coherence tomography. Also, functional assessments such as visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, photostress recovery, dark adaptation, perimetry, and cellular fluorescence will be tested. Adverse events will be recorded and compared with historical controls to ensure that currently accepted interventions are safe. Finally, potential confounding variables for DME including those related to the eye, systemic factors, and patient demographics will be recorded to assess the influence of these variables on treatment response. The primary objective is to develop hypotheses that might better explain the retinal structural (anatomical) and/or functional (physiological) mechanisms of visual impairment in eyes receiving treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME).
To determine if there is visual benefit with Ozurdex treatment every three months compared to monthly anti-VEGF alone, in subjects with persistent diabetic macular edema. The investigator hypothesizes more frequent administration of Ozurdex in patients that have persistent diabetic macular edema will result in a more rapid and sustained improvement of visual acuity and/or optical coherence topography (OCT) compared to the use of anti-VEGF alone.
The drug being tested in this study is low doses of Optina (formerly known as Danazol) (DMI-5207) that may be an effective treatment for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema (DME). Laboratory studies have demonstrated that low doses of this drug may treat diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema by two important ways, decreasing blood vessel permeability (related to leaking and edema) and by decreasing the formation of new leaky blood vessels. Optina is not approved by Health Canada for the treatment of diabetic macular edema but higher doses of Optina are approved by Health Canada for treatment of endometriosis (growth of cells similar to those that form inside of the womb that grows outside of the womb) and fibrocystic breast disease (a condition of the breast tissue). Higher doses of Optina have also been approved in the United States and many other countries since the mid-1970s in the treatment of men and women with hereditary angioedema (a disease which causes swelling in parts of the body) in addition to endometriosis and fibrocystic breast disease in women. All of the Optina doses that will be used in the current study are less than half of the typical starting doses for the approved indications. This can be compared to "high-dose" aspirin that is used to treat, for example, headache, while low-dose "baby aspirin" is used to reduce blood clotting. Similarly, Optina has two different effects at high and low dose. The low doses for this study have been selected based on the laboratory studies mentioned above. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of low doses of Optina in the treatment of macular edema due to diabetes, and also to test if it helps to slow the development of macular edema.
Patients with diabetic macular edema who were switched to aflibercept after having been treated with bevacizumab or ranibizumab were retrospectively reviewed to assess for visual acuity and anatomic outcomes.
The primary objective of the study is to investigate the safety and tolerability of intravitreal (IVT) REGN910-3 and IVT REGN910 in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and separately in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
The primary objective of the study is to assess the ocular and systemic adverse events of ranibizumab (Lucentis)for DME (diabetic macular edema) following previous treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin).
The purpose of this study is to identify Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) characteristics in eyes that show different response to treatment with anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) injections of Lucentis.
Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is generally effective as treatment for center-involved diabetic macular edema (DME), a substantial proportion of anti-VEGF-treated eyes with DME do not achieve vision of 20/20 or complete resolution of retinal thickening. Indeed, over 50% of ranibizumab-treated eyes did not achieve a 2 or more line improvement in visual acuity from baseline at 2 years in Protocol I, a previous DRCR.net (Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network) study. Furthermore, 27% of ranibizumab-treated eyes still had central subfield (CSF) thickness on time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) ≥ 300 at 1 year, and more than 40% of ranibizumab-treated eyes did not achieve complete resolution of retinal thickening (< 250 microns) by 2 years. Thus, there is a need for alternative or additional treatments that will improve vision by reducing retinal edema in eyes with persistent DME following previous anti-VEGF therapy. Intravitreal steroid is not as efficacious as ranibizumab in eyes with DME overall, but it has been shown to have a positive effect for DME in some eyes and might add benefit in eyes that are already receiving anti-VEGF. The main objective of this study is to assess the short-term effects of combination steroid+anti-VEGF therapy on visual acuity and retinal thickness on OCT in comparison with that of continued anti-VEGF therapy alone in eyes with persistent central-involved DME and visual acuity impairment despite previous anti-VEGF treatment. This study will provide important information for the design of a future confirmatory phase III clinical trial on the efficacy of combination steroid and anti-VEGF in eyes with persistent DME and vision impairment following previous anti-VEGF therapy. The primary outcome for efficacy will be the mean change in visual acuity at 24 weeks. Each study eye is required to complete a 12-week run-in phase. The run-in phase will identify study eyes that truly have persistent DME despite anti-VEGF therapy by requiring an additional 3 injections while also collecting standardized visual acuity and OCT measurements. At the enrollment, 4-week and 8-week visits of the run-in phase, enrolled eyes will receive an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab 3mg. Then at the 12-week run-in visit, if the eye still has persistent DME, it will be randomized to receive either intravitreal sham+intravitreal ranibizumab 0.3 or intravitreal dexamethasone+intravitreal ranibizumab 0.3 injections. The randomized study duration is 24 week, during which a protocol visit takes place every month. The combination injections of sham+ranibizumab or dexamethasone +ranibizumab will be given at the randomization visit (baseline) and at the 12-week visit after randomization. In between, an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab only will be given to study eyes at the 4, 8, 16 and 20 week visits.
The purpose of this research study is to determine if a "Treat and Extend" regimen (increasing the time between visits when the disease is stable and not getting worse) of Ranibizumab 0.3 mg injections inside the eye is safe and effective at treating patients with swelling of the retina from diabetes.