View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
Filter by:Hypothesis:Surgical treatment of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot is more effective that medical treatment through antibiotherapy and leads wound healing in ulcers complicated with bone infection.Material and Methods: Randomized clinical trials which include two groups of patients (n=88), one receives medical treatment through antibiotherapy during 90 days and the other group receive conservative surgical treatment and antibiotics during 7 days after surgery. It will be studied differences between both groups in healing time, recidives, present and relationship of adverse events and outflow of quality of life related health .
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of design improvements of the Spiracur SNaP Wound Care System. This study prospectively evaluates the safety and efficacy of current and new design iterations of components of the FDA-cleared Spiracur SNaP Wound Care System in order to optimize safety, efficacy, and system performance.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different commonly used dressings for treating diabetic foot ulcers. It is a prospective study recruiting 50 type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic foot ulcers (2-50cm2). All the patients will give written informed consent prior to getting enrolled in the study. All the patients will be randomly assigned to one of the five groups of the study namely, saline (control),Biatin Ag (Foam), Hydrocolloid, Hydrogel and Ceredak. Follow up of the patients will be done until the complete healing of the wound takes place. All procedures of dressing will be done by an authorized and certified Podiatric Surgeon of the Institution. Details on the cost incurred and days required for the wound to completely heal will be recorded for all the patients. This study will provide the efficacy of all the dressings used for treating diabetic foot ulcers and also the cost of each dressing. This will help the surgeons for managing the diabetic foot ulcers in a better and cost effective way, which in turn will reduce the burden of patients both physically and financially.
This is an open-label, active-control, multicentre, parallel group, randomised and dose-finding efficacy and safety study. Compare the efficacy and safety of BioChaperone PDGF-BB applied at 12.5 µg/cm² every two days for up to 20 weeks to becaplermin gel (Regranex® Gel 0.01%) applied daily for up to 20 weeks for the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer. Assess the effect of a double dose of BioChaperone PDGF-BB (25 µg/cm²) applied every two days for up to 20 weeks.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MEBO in the treatment of subjects with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).
The purpose of this study is to determine which treatment, over 6 months, will promote healing of diabetic foot ulcers that are not infected in the most efficient, cost-effective way.
This study tests two different approaches to the removal of dead tissue from the surface of a wound.
To compare HP828-101 to standard of care for the management of partial or full thickness wounds
The purpose of this study is to assess the mechanism of action of the Unite Biomatrix and compare its performance with the standard of care, saline moistened gauze, for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.
The purpose of the study is to see if FGF-1 is safe when applied topically to the surface of a wound.