Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05977309 |
Other study ID # |
UHarapanBangsa |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 1, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
August 30, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
July 2023 |
Source |
Universitas Harapan Bangsa |
Contact |
Asmat Burhan, MSN |
Phone |
+6285746157782 |
Email |
asmatburhan[@]uhb.ac.id |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Despite conflicting and contradictory evidence regarding its efficacy, some wound care
centres have advocated and adopted ozone for treating DFU. However, there are gaps in the
application of topical ozone therapy. Reported no significant impact on the healing process
of DFU, and not all said that topical ozone can enhance the healing process. This study aimed
to compare the efficacy of topical ozone therapy in conjunction with standard wound care
versus routine wound care alone in treating DFU. The wound, ischemia, and foot infection
(WIFI) scale was used to measure wound size, the tissue survival rate at DFU, infection,
peripheral microcirculation, glycemic control, Hba1c control, and wound healing.
Description:
Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most severe complications that diabetic patients can
develop (1). The lifetime incidence of DFUs is estimated to range between 19% and 34%, and
between 40% and 65% of diabetic patients experience recurrence within 1 to 5 years after
ulcer healing (2). DFUs are prevalent: 6.3% globally and 5.5% in Asia (3). Patients with DFUs
have an increased risk of recurrence, infection, necrosis, and ultimately amputation (2-4).
The prevalence of diabetic ulcers in Indonesia is around 15%, the amputation rate is 30%, and
the mortality rate 1 year after amputation is 14.8% (5). Diabetic foot ulcer patients have a
high mortality rate of almost 50% within 5 years with one of the causes being infection (6).
The most common reason for hospitalization of people with diabetes is DFU, where 25% are at
risk (7) and 20% result in amputations (8). Moreover, according to a meta-analysis, DFU
patients in the gangrenous stage have a high risk of amputation (9). DFU treatment costs the
healthcare system and the patient's family a lot. DFU control requires specific attention
(7). Topical ozone is a cyclic gas composed of three oxygen atoms (10), It can treat various
diseases due to its different documented effects, such as its antioxidant and antibacterial
properties. Ozone gas treats diseases and wounds, including DFU, in topical ozone therapy
(11). Ozone is a gas consisting of three oxygen atoms that decompose swiftly. For instance,
it can be used to treat chronic infections primarily caused by pathogens with antibiotic
resistance (12).
Study design and participants, in five wound care clinics on Java Island, Indonesia, men and
women with diabetic foot ulcer lesions participated in this randomised, triple-blind clinical
trial. Inclusion criteria included women and men receiving treatment for diabetic foot
ulcers, the WIFI scale, current blood sugar between 120 and 180 mg/dl, Hb1ac between 4.5 and
7%, lesion length greater than 5 cm, and infection. Exclusion criteria in this investigation,
such as immunodeficiency disorders, are listed as examples. Sample size, G-Power software was
used to calculate the sample size based on the diabetic foot ulcer wound healing variable in
the study (11). Taking into account M1 = 39.1, M2 = 33.53, SD1 = 4.4, SD2 = 21.62, = 0.05,
and Power = 95%, and taking into account the larger number of samples (n = 210) in each group
and 15% attrition, the final sample size for each group was 215, for a total sample size of
430. Sampling, the researcher (first author) enrolled the study with the UHB office of
research ethics and awaited a referral letter. Upon entering the room, he introduced himself
to the DFU patient, assessed the wound using the WIFI scale, evaluated the inclusion
criteria, and explained the purpose and methodologies of the study during wound care. Men and
women who were eligible to participate and willing to do so submitted a written consent form.
According to their medical records, researchers filled out demographic information.
Participants were randomly assigned to ozone therapy and placebo groups in a ratio of 1:1
using block randomization with Random Allocation Software (RAS) and block sizes of 4 and 6.
By the number of samples, envelopes were prepared, and capsules were deposited within them. 1
to 430 were assigned to each envelope. The envelopes were opened in the order that the
participants entered the study, and the type of intervention was determined. A person
uninvolved in the sampling process prepared envelopes in the allocation order. In this study,
researchers, subjects, and outcome evaluators were all blinded. Intervention, during wound
care, the topical ozone therapy group received a concentration of 30 mg/L at a frequency of
30 minutes per day for 30 days. Participants received ozone therapy topically every three
days for eight treatments. The placebo group received standard wound care and education
regarding DFU wound care. Both groups received instruction in DFU wound care, personal
sanitation, and nutrition. According to the national protocol of the International Working
Group on the Diabetic Foot, the same DFU wound care was administered to both groups (13). A
document containing a table of the days of the week is provided to the individual, who is
instructed to place a mark in the appropriate column each day following consumption. Patients
were given a phone number to call if they had any queries or concerns. The degree of wound
healing was measured using the Wound, Ischemic, and Edema Infection (WIFI) scale. The
enumerator visited each participant at the wound care clinic (data collection and outcome
evaluation). Data collection tool, demographic characteristics and the wound, ischemia, foot
infection (WIFI) scale were utilised for participant inclusion (14), A summary of adverse
events. Age, level of education, employment status, adequate household income, duration of
diabetes, course of DFU treatment, number of sutures, blood sugar, Hb1AC, and ankle-brachial
index were included as demographic variables (15), and toe ankle brachial (16), dll. Toe
ankle brachial Wound, Infection, and Function (WIFI) are graded from 0 to 3. 0: no ulcer, 1:
little ulcer, 2: deep ulcer with gangrene limited to toes, 3: extensive ulcer or infection or
gangrene. Toe Pressure measures ischemic sites. 0: > 60 mmHg, 1: 40-59, 2: 30-39, 3: <30,
while on infection, 0: No infection, 1: Mild (<22cm cellulitis), Moderate (>2cm/purulent), 3:
Severe (Systemic response/Sepsis). Data analysis, the collected data were analysed with
Jamovi software, and their normality was determined with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Intention-to-treat (ITT) was utilised to analyse the outcomes. In this study, wound healing
was regarded as the primary outcome, while infection and ischemia were secondary outcomes.
Independent t-test and Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) were used to compare the
improvements in wound size, brachial toe index, transcutaneous oxygen, and infection between
the two groups.