The Feasibility of a Facebook Group-based Program for Foot Self-management Support of Adults With Diabetes in Canada

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Facebook Group-based Program for Foot Self-management Support of Adults With Diabetes Mellitus: A Feasibility Study in Canada

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04395521
• Other study ID #: 6029718
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 16, 2021
• Est. completion date: October 30, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: March 2023
• Source: Queen's University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective of this study is to examine the feasibility of a Facebook group-based program to support adults with diabetes in their foot self-care and prevention of foot ulcers. The sub-objectives are: 1. To determine the recruitment and retention rate of participants in the study. 2. To assess the acceptability of the Facebook group program among participants. 3. To determine the level and pattern of engagement by the participants within the Facebook group platform. 4. To determine the efficacy of the Facebook group program and how it works to improve diabetic foot care-related outcomes.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 32
• Est. completion date: October 30, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: October 30, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Clinical diagnosis of type I or II diabetes;
• 18 years of age or older
• reside in Canada
• Proficiency in the English language - understanding, speaking, reading, and writing.
• Have an active Facebook account or willing to create one
• Have access to the internet and computer or smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

• Declined consent
• Did not provide follow-up contact information
• Completed less than 60% of the baseline survey

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Diabetic Foot
• Diabetic Foot Ulcer
• Foot Ulcer

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Diabetic foot self-management support
Daily educational organic or inorganic posts (2 to 5) released in a timed sequence through a Hootsuite application plus peer interactions/support for three months.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	School of Nursing, Queens University	Kingston	Ontario

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Helen Obilor	Wounds Canada

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (34)

Abedin T, Ahmed S, Al Mamun M, Ahmed SW, Newaz S, Rumana N, Turin TC. YouTube as a source of useful information on diabetes foot care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;110(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 13. — View Citation

Abedin T, Al Mamun M, Lasker MAA, Ahmed SW, Shommu N, Rumana N, Turin TC. Social Media as a Platform for Information About Diabetes Foot Care: A Study of Facebook Groups. Can J Diabetes. 2017 Feb;41(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.08.217. — View Citation

Adarmouch L, Elyacoubi A, Dahmash L, El Ansari N, Sebbani M, Amine M. Short-term effectiveness of a culturally tailored educational intervention on foot self-care among type 2 diabetes patients in Morocco. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2017 Feb 9;7:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2017.01.002. eCollection 2017 Mar. — View Citation

Ahmad Sharoni SK, Abdul Rahman H, Minhat HS, Shariff-Ghazali S, Azman Ong MH. The effects of self-efficacy enhancing program on foot self-care behaviour of older adults with diabetes: A randomised controlled trial in elderly care facility, Peninsular Malaysia. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0192417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192417. eCollection 2018. — View Citation

Ahmad Sharoni SK, Minhat HS, Mohd Zulkefli NA, Baharom A. Health education programmes to improve foot self-care practices and foot problems among older people with diabetes: a systematic review. Int J Older People Nurs. 2016 Sep;11(3):214-39. doi: 10.1111/opn.12112. Epub 2016 Feb 25. — View Citation

Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2367-2375. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1615439. No abstract available. — View Citation

Bilandzic A, Rosella L. The cost of diabetes in Canada over 10 years: applying attributable health care costs to a diabetes incidence prediction model. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2017 Feb;37(2):49-53. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.37.2.03. — View Citation

Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002. — View Citation

Bus SA, van Netten JJ. A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:195-200. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2738. — View Citation

Dorresteijn JA, Kriegsman DM, Assendelft WJ, Valk GD. Patient education for preventing diabetic foot ulceration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 16;2014(12):CD001488. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001488.pub5. — View Citation

Fan L, Sidani S, Cooper-Brathwaite A, Metcalfe K. Improving foot self-care knowledge, self-efficacy, and behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes at low risk for foot ulceration: a pilot study. Clin Nurs Res. 2014 Dec;23(6):627-43. doi: 10.1177/1054773813491282. Epub 2013 Jul 3. — View Citation

Frykberg RG, Zgonis T, Armstrong DG, Driver VR, Giurini JM, Kravitz SR, Landsman AS, Lavery LA, Moore JC, Schuberth JM, Wukich DK, Andersen C, Vanore JV; American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Diabetic foot disorders. A clinical practice guideline (2006 revision). J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;45(5 Suppl):S1-66. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(07)60001-5. — View Citation

Gershater MA, Pilhammar E, Apelqvist J, Alm-Roijer C. Patient education for the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers. European Diabetes Nursing. 2011: 8: 102-107b.

Grady PA, Gough LL. Self-management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):e25-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041. Epub 2014 Jun 12. — View Citation

Jeffcoate W, Barron E, Lomas J, Valabhji J, Young B. Using data to tackle the burden of amputation in diabetes. Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):e29-e30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32401-7. Epub 2017 Sep 11. No abstract available. — View Citation

Jeffcoate WJ, Vileikyte L, Boyko EJ, Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM. Current Challenges and Opportunities in the Prevention and Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2018 Apr;41(4):645-652. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1836. — View Citation

Lincoln NB, Radford KA, Game FL, Jeffcoate WJ. Education for secondary prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2008 Nov;51(11):1954-61. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1110-0. Epub 2008 Aug 30. — View Citation

Maydick DR, Acee AM. Comorbid Depression and Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Home Healthc Now. 2016 Feb;34(2):62-7. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000340. — View Citation

McGowan PT. Self-management education and support in chronic disease management. Prim Care. 2012 Jun;39(2):307-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 24. — View Citation

Monami M, Longo R, Desideri CM, Masotti G, Marchionni N, Mannucci E. The diabetic person beyond a foot ulcer: healing, recurrence, and depressive symptoms. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;98(2):130-6. doi: 10.7547/0980130. — View Citation

Monami M, Zannoni S, Gaias M, Nreu B, Marchionni N, Mannucci E. Effects of a Short Educational Program for the Prevention of Foot Ulcers in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:615680. doi: 10.1155/2015/615680. Epub 2015 Sep 10. — View Citation

Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933. — View Citation

Obilor HN, Adejumo PO. Assessment of diabetic foot ulcer-related pain and its relationship to quality of life. Wound Practice and Research. 2015; 23 (3): 124-131.

Ogrin R, Viswanathan R, Aylen T, Wallace F, Scott J, Kumar D. Co-design of an evidence-based health education diabetes foot app to prevent serious foot complications: a feasibility study. Practical Diabetes. 2018; 35: 203-209d.

Partridge SR, Gallagher P, Freeman B, Gallagher R. Facebook Groups for the Management of Chronic Diseases. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 17;20(1):e21. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7558. — View Citation

Patel R, Chang T, Greysen SR, Chopra V. Social Media Use in Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review and Novel Taxonomy. Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1335-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Jul 6. — View Citation

Petrovski G, Zivkovic M. Impact of Facebook on Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: A Three-Year Cohort Study. JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Jun 7;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.7693. — View Citation

Schaper NC, Van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Lipsky BA, Bakker K; International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: a Summary Guidance for Daily Practice 2015, based on the IWGDF Guidance Documents. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:7-15. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2695. — View Citation

Smith PE, McGuire J, Falci M, Poudel DR, Kaufman R, Patterson MA, Pelleschi B, Shin E. Analysis of YouTube as a Source of Information for Diabetic Foot Care. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2019 Mar;109(2):122-126. doi: 10.7547/16-149. — View Citation

Tickle-Degnen L. Nuts and bolts of conducting feasibility studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;67(2):171-6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.006270. — View Citation

Torgerson DJ, Sibbald B. Understanding controlled trials. What is a patient preference trial? BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7128.360. No abstract available. — View Citation

Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520. — View Citation

Woo K. New initiative: Online social support program for people with diabetes and foot ulcers. Diabetic Foot Canada. 2014; 2(3): 11-12.

Woodbury MG, Botros M, Kuhnke JL, Greene J. Evaluation of a peer-led self-management education programme PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You. Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10(6):703-11. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12188. — View Citation

* Note: There are 34 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The number of participants that accepted the intervention.	Number of participants who scored above 70 in the questionnaire on acceptance and satisfaction with the Facebook group-based program.	Four weeks after the commencement of intervention.
Primary	The level of participants' engagement in the Facebook group.	The number of participants who viewed and reacted (comments and likes) to educational posts.	Throughout the intervention period (3 months).
Primary	The efficacy of the study intervention on participants' foot self-care adherence.	Mean difference in participants' baseline and three-month post-intervention foot self-care adherence. Foot self-care adherence will be assessed using an adapted Foot Self-Care Behavior Tool, which consists of 17 items on preventive and potentially destructive foot self-care practices with a score range of 0 - 87.	Two time points > Baseline and at the end of the intervention period (3 months).
Secondary	The efficacy of the study intervention on participants' foot self-care confidence.	Mean difference in participants' baseline and three-month post-intervention foot self-care confidence. Foot self-care confidence will be measured using the Foot Care Confidence Scale (FCCS), which consists of 12 items on a five-point Likert scale with a score range of 12 - 60.	Two time points > Baseline and at the end of the intervention period (3 months).
Secondary	The efficacy of the study intervention on participants' perceived foot health status.	Mean difference in participants' baseline and three-month post-intervention perceived foot health status. Perceived foot health status will be assessed using the general foot health questions 9 and 12 of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire with a score range of 2 - 10.	Two time points > Baseline and at the end of the intervention period (3 months).
Secondary	The efficacy of the study intervention on participants' awareness of community resources.	Mean difference in participants' baseline and three-month post-intervention awareness of community resources. Participants' awareness of community resources will be assessed by asking them to rate the extent to which they can successfully locate available resources in their community for preventing DFU on a scale of 0 - 10.	Two time points > Baseline and at the end of the intervention period (3 months).
Secondary	The efficacy of the study intervention on participants' communication with health care professionals.	Mean difference in participants' baseline and three-month post-intervention communication with health care professionals. Participants' level of communication with health care professionals about their foot health will be assessed using an adapted Stanford University Chronic Disease Self-Management Program Communication with Physicians' Tool with a score range of 0 - 15.	Two time points > Baseline and at the end of the intervention period (3 months).
Secondary	The efficacy of the study intervention on participants' quality of life.	Mean difference in participants' baseline and three-month post-intervention quality of life score. The participants' quality of life will be assessed using the Medical Outcome Study Short Form questionnaire (SF-12).	Two time points > Baseline and at the end of the intervention period (3 months).

External Links

•   Clinical best practice guidelines: Assessment and management of foot ulcers for people with diabetes.
•   Diabetes-prevalence and care practices: Findings.
•   Foundations of best practice for skin and wound management: Best practice recommendations for the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers
•   IDF diabetes atlas
•   IWGDF Practical Guidelines on the Prevention and Management of Diabetic Foot Disease.
•   Most popular social networks worldwide as of October 2019, ranked by number of active users.
•   Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018
•   Social Networking in Canada.
•   The economic impact of offloading devices for the prevention of amputations in Ontario.