Comparing the Efficacy of tDCS and tRNS to Improve Reading Skills in Children and Adolescents With Dyslexia

Developmental Dyslexia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparing the Efficacy of tDCS and tRNS to Improve Reading Skills in Children and Adolescents With Dyslexia

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Enrolling by invitation

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05832060
• Other study ID #: 2639_OPBG_2021
• Status: Enrolling by invitation
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 1, 2023
• Est. completion date: March 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: September 2023
• Source: Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The present study grounds on the absence of evidence-based treatment in individuals with developmental dyslexia (DD). At this topic, the present study will explore the potential effect of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over bilateral temporo-parietal cortex (TPC), cerebral areas usually disrupted in individuals with DD. The investigators hypothesized that active tRNS and tDCS over TPC will boost reading skills in children and adolescents with DD. On the contrary, sham (placebo) tRNS and tDCS over TPC will not have significant effect in improving reading skills. Further, both active and sham tRNS and tDCS will be safe and well tolerated.

Description:

The study design is within-subject, randomized stratified, double blind, placebo-controlled. A group of children and adolescents with DD will be selected and exposed to three different conditions with an interval-session of at least 6 days: 1. tRNS over bilateral TPC; 2. anodal tDCS over left TPC (cathode over right TPC); 3. sham tRNS or tDCS. During stimulation (both real and sham), participants will undergo a concomitant reading task. In this project, the investigators will work to understand whether a brain-based intervention, with the use of tRNS and tDCS, can improve the outcome of individuals with DD. The protocol will allow the investigators to: - comparing the efficacy of tDCS and tRNS over TPC in improving reading abilities, - comparing the safety and tolerability of tDCS and tRNS in children and adolescents. The investigator's overarching goal is to provide a scientific foundation for devising new rehabilitation strategies in DD, based on the two most used brain stimulation techniques in pediatric population.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Enrolling by invitation
• Enrollment: 24
• Est. completion date: March 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: March 1, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 8 Years to 13 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Children and adolescents with dyslexia (DSM-5, APA 2013)
• IQ = 85

Exclusion Criteria:

• Having a comorbidity with an important medical conditions;
• Having neurological diseases;
• Having Epilepsy o family history of epilepsy;
• Receiving a treatment for dyslexia in the previous three months before the baseline screening.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Developmental Dyslexia
• Dyslexia

Intervention

Device:
• Active tDCS
Active tDCS will be delivered over TPC for a stimulation session. The anodal electrode will be placed on the left TPC, T7/TP7 position according to the 10-20 International EEG 10-20 System for electrode placement. The cathodal electrode will be placed on the right TPC, T8/TP8 position. Intensity will be set at 1 mA, the duration of stimulation will be 20 min.
• Active tRNS
Active tRNS will be delivered to bilateral TPC for a stimulation session. The electrodes will be placed on the left and right TPC, respectively T7/TP7 and T8/TP8 position, at 0.75 mA (100-500 Hz) for 20 min.
• Sham tRNS or tDCS
Sham tRNS or tDCS will be delivered over bilateral TPC for a stimulation session. The same electrodes placement as well as the stimulation set-up will be used as in the active stimulation conditions, but the current will be applied for 30 s and will be ramped down without the participants awareness.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute	Roma

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (47)

Ambrus GG, Paulus W, Antal A. Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: comparison of tDCS and tRNS. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;121(11):1908-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 May 14. — View Citation

Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1229-36. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576785. Epub 2010 Apr 15. — View Citation

Bakker DJ. Treatment of developmental dyslexia: a review. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Jan-Mar;9(1):3-13. doi: 10.1080/13638490500065392. — View Citation

Berger I, Dakwar-Kawar O, Grossman ES, Nahum M, Cohen Kadosh R. Scaffolding the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder brain using transcranial direct current and random noise stimulation: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Mar;132(3 — View Citation

Breitling C, Zaehle T, Dannhauer M, Tegelbeckers J, Flechtner HH, Krauel K. Comparison between conventional and HD-tDCS of the right inferior frontal gyrus in children and adolescents with ADHD. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 May;131(5):1146-1154. doi: 10.1016/j — View Citation

Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;14(8):1133-45. doi: 10.1017/S — View Citation

Cappelletti M, Gessaroli E, Hithersay R, Mitolo M, Didino D, Kanai R, Cohen Kadosh R, Walsh V. Transfer of cognitive training across magnitude dimensions achieved with concurrent brain stimulation of the parietal lobe. J Neurosci. 2013 Sep 11;33(37):14899 — View Citation

Cattaneo Z, Pisoni A, Papagno C. Transcranial direct current stimulation over Broca's region improves phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroscience. 2011 Jun 2;183:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.058. Epub 2011 Apr 6. — View Citation

Chaieb L, Antal A, Pisoni A, Saiote C, Opitz A, Ambrus GG, Focke N, Paulus W. Safety of 5 kHz tACS. Brain Stimul. 2014 Jan-Feb;7(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 13. — View Citation

Costanzo F, Menghini D, Caltagirone C, Oliveri M, Vicari S. High frequency rTMS over the left parietal lobule increases non-word reading accuracy. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Jul 20. — View Citation

Costanzo F, Rossi S, Varuzza C, Varvara P, Vicari S, Menghini D. Long-lasting improvement following tDCS treatment combined with a training for reading in children and adolescents with dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jul;130:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neurops — View Citation

Costanzo F, Varuzza C, Rossi S, Sdoia S, Varvara P, Oliveri M, Giacomo K, Vicari S, Menghini D. Evidence for reading improvement following tDCS treatment in children and adolescents with Dyslexia. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2016;34(2):215-26. doi: 10.3233/RN — View Citation

Costanzo F, Varuzza C, Rossi S, Sdoia S, Varvara P, Oliveri M, Koch G, Vicari S, Menghini D. Reading changes in children and adolescents with dyslexia after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2016 Mar 23;27(5):295-300. doi: 10.1097/WNR. — View Citation

Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Marceglia S, Cogiamanian F, Barbieri S, Scarpini E, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008 Aug 12;71(7):493-8. doi: 10. — View Citation

Fertonani A, Pirulli C, Miniussi C. Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15416-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011. — View Citation

Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Bermpohl F, Antal A, Feredoes E, Marcolin MA, Rigonatti SP, Silva MT, Paulus W, Pascual-Leone A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;166(1):23 — View Citation

Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19. — View Citation

Heth I, Lavidor M. Improved reading measures in adults with dyslexia following transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Feb 19. — View Citation

Hoeft F, Hernandez A, McMillon G, Taylor-Hill H, Martindale JL, Meyler A, Keller TA, Siok WT, Deutsch GK, Just MA, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Gabrieli JD. Neural basis of dyslexia: a comparison between dyslexic and nondyslexic children equated for reading abil — View Citation

Hoeft F, McCandliss BD, Black JM, Gantman A, Zakerani N, Hulme C, Lyytinen H, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Glover GH, Reiss AL, Gabrieli JD. Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 4;108(1):361-6. doi: 10.1073/ — View Citation

Jancke L, Cheetham M, Baumgartner T. Virtual reality and the role of the prefrontal cortex in adults and children. Front Neurosci. 2009 May 1;3(1):52-9. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.006.2009. eCollection 2009 May. — View Citation

Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, Lee L, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN, Frackowiak RS. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):495-504. d — View Citation

Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology. 2010 Dec 14;75(24):2176-84. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a. Epub 2010 Nov 10. — View Citation

Linkersdorfer J, Lonnemann J, Lindberg S, Hasselhorn M, Fiebach CJ. Grey matter alterations co-localize with functional abnormalities in developmental dyslexia: an ALE meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043122. Epub 2012 — View Citation

Looi CY, Lim J, Sella F, Lolliot S, Duta M, Avramenko AA, Cohen Kadosh R. Transcranial random noise stimulation and cognitive training to improve learning and cognition of the atypically developing brain: A pilot study. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 5;7(1):4633. doi: — View Citation

Mattai A, Miller R, Weisinger B, Greenstein D, Bakalar J, Tossell J, David C, Wassermann EM, Rapoport J, Gogtay N. Tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Brain Stimul. 2011 Oct;4(4):275-80. doi: 10.1016/j — View Citation

Miniussi C, Rossini PM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Oct;21(5):579-601. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.562689. Epub 2011 Jun 24. — View Citation

Monti A, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Zago S, Priori A. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;79(4):451-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007. — View Citation

Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W, Tergau F. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 May 15;15(4):619-26. doi: — View Citation

Paulesu E, Danelli L, Berlingeri M. Reading the dyslexic brain: multiple dysfunctional routes revealed by a new meta-analysis of PET and fMRI activation studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 11;8:830. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00830. eCollection 2014. — View Citation

Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007 May 30;72(4-6):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 24. — View Citation

Richlan F, Kronbichler M, Wimmer H. Structural abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Nov;34(11):3055-65. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22127. Epub 2012 Jun 19. — View Citation

Rubio-Morell B, Rotenberg A, Hernandez-Exposito S, Pascual-Leone A. [The use of noninvasive brain stimulation in childhood psychiatric disorders: new diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities and challenges]. Rev Neurol. 2011 Aug 16;53(4):209-25. Spanish. — View Citation

Rufener KS, Krauel K, Meyer M, Heinze HJ, Zaehle T. Transcranial electrical stimulation improves phoneme processing in developmental dyslexia. Brain Stimul. 2019 Jul-Aug;12(4):930-937. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 13. — View Citation

Schlaug G, Marchina S, Norton A. From Singing to Speaking: Why Singing May Lead to Recovery of Expressive Language Function in Patients with Broca's Aphasia. Music Percept. 2008 Apr 1;25(4):315-323. doi: 10.1525/MP.2008.25.4.315. — View Citation

Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1571-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.12.1571. — View Citation

Schneider HD, Hopp JP. The use of the Bilingual Aphasia Test for assessment and transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate language acquisition in minimally verbal children with autism. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):640-54. doi: 10.3109/02 — View Citation

Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, Mencl WE, Fulbright RK, Skudlarski P, Constable RT, Marchione KE, Fletcher JM, Lyon GR, Gore JC. Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jul 15;52( — View Citation

Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA, Pugh KR, Fulbright RK, Constable RT, Mencl WE, Shankweiler DP, Liberman AM, Skudlarski P, Fletcher JM, Katz L, Marchione KE, Lacadie C, Gatenby C, Gore JC. Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dys — View Citation

Simos PG, Fletcher JM, Bergman E, Breier JI, Foorman BR, Castillo EM, Davis RN, Fitzgerald M, Papanicolaou AC. Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology. 2002 Apr 23;58(8):1203-13. doi: 10. — View Citation

Snowball A, Tachtsidis I, Popescu T, Thompson J, Delazer M, Zamarian L, Zhu T, Cohen Kadosh R. Long-term enhancement of brain function and cognition using cognitive training and brain stimulation. Curr Biol. 2013 Jun 3;23(11):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.20 — View Citation

Stuss DT. The future of cognitive neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Oct;21(5):755-68. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.605590. Epub 2011 Sep 27. — View Citation

Temple E, Deutsch GK, Poldrack RA, Miller SL, Tallal P, Merzenich MM, Gabrieli JD. Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4;100(5):2860-5. doi: 10.1 — View Citation

Terney D, Chaieb L, Moliadze V, Antal A, Paulus W. Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. J Neurosci. 2008 Dec 24;28(52):14147-55. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4248-08.2008. — View Citation

Turkeltaub PE, Benson J, Hamilton RH, Datta A, Bikson M, Coslett HB. Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiency. Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 5. — View Citation

Vandermosten M, Boets B, Wouters J, Ghesquiere P. A qualitative and quantitative review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in reading and dyslexia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jul;36(6):1532-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Err — View Citation

Vines BW, Norton AC, Schlaug G. Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the effects of melodic intonation therapy. Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 26;2:230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00230. eCollection 2011. — View Citation

* Note: There are 47 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Text reading accuracy (Experimental reading task)	Change from baseline in text reading accuracy during Active tDCS and Active tRNS sessions than during Sham tDCS and Sham tRNS sessions. Text reading accuracy is considered as the percentage (%) of accuracy and computed as the ratio between the number of correctly read stimuli and the total number of stimuli presented multiplied by 100.	during procedure
Secondary	Text reading speed (Experimental reading task)	Change from baseline in text reading speed during Active tDCS and Active tRNS sessions than during Sham tDCS and Sham tRNS sessions. Text reading speed is considered as the syllables/seconds ratio and calculated dividing the total number of syllables pronounced by the total time spent to complete the reading (in seconds).	during procedure
Secondary	Experimental reading task: high-frequency word reading accuracy	Change from baseline in high-frequency word reading accuracy during Active tDCS and Active tRNS sessions than during Sham tDCS and Sham tRNS sessions. High-frequency word reading accuracy is considered as the percentage (%) of accuracy and computed as the ratio between the number of correctly read stimuli and the total number of stimuli presented multiplied by 100.	during procedure
Secondary	Experimental reading task: high-frequency word reading speed	Change from baseline in high-frequency word reading speed during Active tDCS and Active tRNS sessions than during Sham tDCS and Sham tRNS sessions. High-frequency word reading speed is considered as the syllables/seconds ratio and calculated dividing the total number of syllables pronounced by the total time spent to complete the reading (in seconds).	during procedure
Secondary	Experimental reading task: low-frequency word reading accuracy	Change from baseline in low-frequency word reading accuracy during Active tDCS and Active tRNS sessions than during Sham tDCS and Sham tRNS sessions. Low-frequency word reading accuracy is considered as the percentage (%) of accuracy and computed as the ratio between the number of correctly read stimuli and the total number of stimuli presented multiplied by 100.	during procedure
Secondary	Experimental reading task: low-frequency word reading speed	Change from baseline in low-frequency word reading speed during Active tDCS and Active tRNS sessions than during Sham tDCS and Sham tRNS sessions. Low-frequency word reading speed is considered as the syllables/seconds ratio and calculated dividing the total number of syllables pronounced by the total time spent to complete the reading (in seconds).	during procedure
Secondary	Experimental reading task: non-word reading accuracy	Change from baseline in non-word reading accuracy during Active tDCS and Active tRNS sessions than during Sham tDCS and Sham tRNS sessions. Non-word reading accuracy is considered as the percentage (%) of accuracy and computed as the ratio between the number of correctly read stimuli and the total number of stimuli presented multiplied by 100.	during procedure
Secondary	Experimental reading task: non-word reading speed	Change from baseline in non-word reading speed during Active tDCS and Active tRNS sessions than during Sham tDCS and Sham tRNS sessions. Non-word reading speed is considered as the syllables/seconds ratio and calculated dividing the total number of syllables pronounced by the total time spent to complete the reading (in seconds).	during procedure