Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04382482
Other study ID # 08/17oss
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date January 20, 2018
Est. completion date January 30, 2021

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source IRCCS Eugenio Medea
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The study aims to document the effects of the intervention system for specific reading and spelling disorders, currently in use at Scientific Institute (IRCCS) Medea as an innovative intervention model in e-health mode. The model constitutes the application of research data collected in more than fifteen years research on the causes of dyslexia and rehabilitation techniques, combined with the most advanced technologies for remotely-controlled clinical management and therapy monitoring through adaptive, self-updating algorithms. A single group of about 80 children will be observed and their performance on reading, spelling and metaphonological tests at pre-test, post-test and follow-up (after 6 months) will be recorded in order to assess improvement (and, consequently, treatment effectiveness) and its stability. The improvements obtained in four weeks treatment will subsequently be compared with those obtained with outpatient intervention programmes of the same duration and intensity.


Description:

The system for the improvement of reading and writing skills ("Tachidino" software) is based on two principles of proven effectiveness: 1. The selective stimulation of a cerebral hemisphere and specific reading strategies. Taking up some of the principles already set out in the Balance Model of Dyslexia, the aim is to retrace the different stages of reading acquisition by focusing on those stages and processes which have proved more problematic or less efficiently activated. Such stages may require greater involvement of the right hemisphere, carrying out an accurate visual analysis of the material to be read, or of the left hemisphere, anticipating the words to be read by exploiting linguistic skills (knowledge of words, relationships between meanings, relationships between sounds, grammatical agreement and syntactic rules, etc.); 2. the training of selective visuospatial attention, as well as the perception of rapid movement and the analysis of the visual characteristics of words. A further mechanism involved in the training is the so-called visual crowding, an automatic effect of our perceptual system producing a sort of "blurring" of the visual areas surrounding the object to be analyzed, to make its vision clearer. A malfunction of this mechanism and an insufficient ability to concentrate visual attention in a restricted area of the visual field, or to move it quickly and precisely from one point to another would be among the causes of reading disorders, as suggested by the Magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Studies carried out by researchers at IRCCS Medea have shown excellent results for the two types of treatment (Hemisphere-specific stimulation according to the Balance Model, and Visual-attentional training with Action Video- Games or Wii games, but above all they showed how these effects are strongly enhanced by the association in a single intervention. Clinical and assessment procedures In the Tachidino program, the child (sitting in fron of the computer screen) is required to recognize the target candy (a spiral candy) among various candies (distractors) and press the space bar at the exact moment the target candy is crossing a circle target (fixation point). The word to be decoded/encoded is presented, visually or auditory, only if the child clicks at the right moment, thus ensuring that fixation was in correspondence with the fixation point in the center of the visual field. If the bar is pressed in the target timeframe and in correspondence of the target candy, the word to be decoded/encoded is immediately presented and the child is asked to either write the word on the keyboard or re-order a sequence containing all the correct graphemes in random order. All visual stimuli are presented at tachistoscopic speed to a visual hemifield in order to stimulate the contralateral hemisphere to a greater degree, or they may also be flashed in the center of the computer screen, involving both hemispheres simultaneously. The visual hemisphere-specific stimulation is based on a revisit of Bakker's 'Balance model'. Each child was classified as a P-, L-, or M-type dyslexic reader based on the persistent over-reliance on specific reading strategies as shown by reading and spelling errors, and on reading speed. As per current clinical practice, intervention in "e-health" mode is divided into one or more rehabilitation modules through the use of the Tachidino platform, with systematic monitoring and motivational reinforcement by professionals with experience in e-health approaches. In order to be included in the training, the child must have already obtained a diagnosis of dyslexia, according to the current diagnostic standards. The structure of the intervention modules, as currently implemented, is as follows: - 1 initial meeting to get to know the child, pre-test assessment - reading and writing tests of words, non-words and sentences, metaphonological tests (phonemic elision and synthesis) and text reading tests (reading accuracy and speed) in order to define dyslexia subtypes; intervention planning - demonstration of Tachidino use and programming of first activities - telephone support to monitor and motivate correct use of the software, during active intervention - 1 final assessment meeting (with repetition of the tests used at pre-test and compilation of satisfaction questionnaires). - 1 follow-up meeting 6 months after discharge with repetition of reading tests (this meeting is relevant in order to assess stabilization of obtained improvements) Participants' characteristics: Children aged between 7 and 14 years with a diagnosis of Specific Reading Disorder or Specific Spelling Disorder, not treated before. The improvements obtained in one month treatment will be compared with those obtained with outpatient intervention programmes of the same duration and intensity, combining treatment based on the two component parts: Visual Hemisphere-Specific Stimulation (V-HSS) and Visual-Attentional Training with Action Video Games.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 80
Est. completion date January 30, 2021
Est. primary completion date December 1, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 7 Years to 16 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - A formal diagnosis of Developmental Dyslexia, Specific Reading Disorders, Specific Spelling Disorders or Mixed Learning Disorders - Age between 7 and 16 - Attending at least the third class of primary school - Monolingual speakers of Italian or bilingual speakers with perfect mastery of the Italian language (equivalent to monolinguals) - Intelligence Quotient (IQ) >= 80 - At least one z-score below -2 Standard Deviations from age mean in at least one of the following tests: text reading, word reading, nonword reading, word writing to dictation, nonword writing to dictation ("DDE-2" battery, "MT" tests) - Not having received any specific rehabilitation treatment for dyslexia before Exclusion Criteria: - Intellectual disability - Neurological disorders - Sensory deficits that are not /cannot be corrected-to-normal by lenses or hearing aids.

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Tachidino
Web-platform delivering remote treatment of reading and spelling disorders through the (visual or auditory) presentation of words and sentences to be either decoded or corrected (reordering wrong letter sequences).

Locations

Country Name City State
Italy Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea Bosisio Parini LC

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (8)

Bakker DJ. Neuropsychological classification and treatment of dyslexia. J Learn Disabil. 1992 Feb;25(2):102-9. doi: 10.1177/002221949202500203. — View Citation

Bakker DJ. Treatment of developmental dyslexia: a review. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Jan-Mar;9(1):3-13. doi: 10.1080/13638490500065392. — View Citation

Franceschini S, Gori S, Ruffino M, Viola S, Molteni M, Facoetti A. Action video games make dyslexic children read better. Curr Biol. 2013 Mar 18;23(6):462-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.044. Epub 2013 Feb 28. — View Citation

Lorusso ML, Borasio F, Misto P, Salandi A, Travellini S, Lotito M, Molteni M. Remote treatment of developmental dyslexia: how ADHD comorbidity, clinical history and treatment repetition may affect its efficacy. Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 10;11:1135465. — View Citation

Lorusso ML, Borasio F, Molteni M. Remote Neuropsychological Intervention for Developmental Dyslexia with the Tachidino Platform: No Reduction in Effectiveness for Older Nor for More Severely Impaired Children. Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 5;9(1):71. doi: 10 — View Citation

Lorusso ML, Borasio F, Molteni M. The challenge of remote treatment in neuropsychological intervention for reading and spelling in dyslexia: A prospective observational cohort study. Dyslexia. 2024 Feb;30(1):e1758. doi: 10.1002/dys.1758. Epub 2024 Jan 15. — View Citation

Lorusso ML, Facoetti A, Bakker DJ. Neuropsychological treatment of dyslexia: does type of treatment matter? J Learn Disabil. 2011 Mar-Apr;44(2):136-49. doi: 10.1177/0022219410391186. — View Citation

Lorusso ML, Facoetti A, Paganoni P, Pezzani M, Molteni M. Effects of visual hemisphere-specific stimulation versus reading-focused training in dyslexic children. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006 Apr;16(2):194-212. doi: 10.1080/09602010500145620. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other comparison with existing data about inpatient treatment effectiveness difference in z-scores (reading speed and accuracy measured with "MT tests" and "DDE-2") between changes obtained with Tachidino remotely delivered intervention and inpatient treatment with the same combined components (Visual Hemisphere-Specific Stimulation and Action Video-Games), both conducted over 4 weeks. Data about improvement obtained with inpatient treatment were previously collected at IRCCS E. Medea (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02791841, published in Frontiers in Psychology, 2020) 4 weeks
Primary change from pre-test to post-test in reading ability Difference in treatment-related changes (post-test minus pre-test) observed in reading measures (speed and accuracy in word, nonword and text reading standardized tests: Memory Training (MT) group reading test and "Developmental Dyslexia and Dysgraphia (DDE-2); average of the scores expressed as z-scores with respect to age norms) 4 weeks
Primary change from pre-test to post-test in spelling ability Difference in treatment-related changes (post-test minus pre-test) observed in spelling tests (writing to dictation of words, nonwords and sentences) - average of the scores expressed as z-scores with respect to age norms in standardized tests ("DDE-2", "Diagnosis of Dysgraphic Disorders" (DDO-2)) 4 weeks
Secondary change from pre-test to post-test in metaphonological ability Difference in treatment-related changes (post-test minus pre-test) observed in metaphonological tests (phonemic elision and phoneme blending) - average of the number of errors in the two tests 4 weeks
Secondary persistence of improvement at follow-up (6 months) no significant difference between post-test scores and follow-up scores (follow-up 6 months after discharge and in the absence of further intervention) in text, word and nonword reading ("MT" tests, "DDE-2") 7 months (1 month intervention and 6 months follow-up)
Secondary satisfaction with remote intervention experience scores expressed by parents and patients at post-test, on a questionnaire concerning satisfaction with the delivery of remote intervention and its effects 4 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05972200 - V5/MT Stimulation on Reading and Reading-related Measures in Developmental Dyslexia N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05832060 - Comparing the Efficacy of tDCS and tRNS to Improve Reading Skills in Children and Adolescents With Dyslexia N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03199092 - Rhythmic Reading Training Compared to 'Abilmente' Method N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04384718 - Assessing the Generalizability of the Tachidino Protocol to Different Clinical Contexts
Active, not recruiting NCT00068835 - Using fMRI to Evaluate Instructional Programs for Children With Developmental Dyslexia N/A
Recruiting NCT04995991 - Rhythmic Reading Training: Comparing the Rhythmic and Visual Contributions to Reading Improvement N/A
Recruiting NCT02217696 - Prediction and Intervention in Developmental Dyslexia N/A
Recruiting NCT02791841 - Comparison of Interventions for Developmental Dyslexia N/A
Completed NCT02393729 - Functional MRI Study in Children With a Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) and/or Developmental Dyslexia (DD) N/A
Completed NCT00254644 - Morphofunctional Imaging and Developmental Dyslexia N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03448237 - Orthophonic and / or Proprioceptive Treatment of Developmental Dyslexia. N/A
Completed NCT04250701 - Postural Control, Grip Strength and Body Posture in Children With Intellectual Disability and Dyslexia
Recruiting NCT05583136 - Restoring Neural Oscillatory Communication in Developmental Dyslexia N/A
Recruiting NCT03119402 - Effects of the Combination of RRT With tDCS on Dyslexic Adults N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04995471 - Telerehabilitation vs. in Presence Rehabilitation of Reading Disorders Using the Rhythmic Reading Training (RRT) N/A