View clinical trials related to Dermatitis, Atopic.
Filter by:A randomized controlled study in children with AD, divided into three groups: a control group without access to the app, an experimental observational group with the app, and an experimental interventional group with potential investigator supervision. Outcome measures included the SCORAD and the POEM scores.
To verify the efficacy and tolerability of Activated Piroctone Olamine (Blue Cap Foam, label volume 100 ml) by CATALYSIS, S. L. Madrid, applied in the management of all types of dermatitis (atopic, seborrheic, eczema) in patients with significant manifestations of the disease in varying areas of the body of varying extent and to assess differences in individual tolerability and the final effect in a group of selected patients aged 3 to 18 years.
Participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a twice daily oral LNK01001 dose A or LNK01001 dose B or matching placebo for 12 weeks.
The purpose of this study is assess if the use of probiotic in very low weight could be other benefits a long time, as reduce atopic disease in this children.
The aim of the study is to determine the relationship between insulin resistance and disease duration and severity of atopic dermatitis.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate ASN008 in people with itch caused by eczema. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the efficacy and safety of ASN008? - What is the impact of ASN008 on itch in patients with atopic dermatitis? Participants will be asked to apply topical ASN008, or matching vehicle (placebo containing no active drug), to their eczema lesions twice daily for 4 weeks. Researchers will compare 3 different doses of ASN008 and a matching vehicle group to see which group responds best.
Complementary and alternative medicine are increasingly used all around the world and more specifically in chronic diseases such as atopic dermatitis. Sociodemographic and disease determinants associated with their use remain unclear. Moreover, most of studies involved children and little data are available for adults. The main objective of this study is to identify factors associated with complementary and alternative medicine use in children and adults suffering from atopic dermatitis. The secondary objectives are to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use, the main forms used and their modalities of use, patients' motivations for using these therapies and sources of information. Patients of all ages consulting for their atopic dermatitis at the dermatology or pediatric allergology department of Nancy University Hospital over a 6 months period will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about their pathology and their use of complementary and alternative medicine. This questionnaire will be collected before they leave the hospital.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability and of a cosmetic product to one that is already available on the market (benchmark product). Efficacy is assessed by instrumental measurements of skin condition, clinical examinations, and questionnaires.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a cosmetic product to one that is already available on the market (benchmark product). Efficacy is assessed by instrumental measurements of skin condition, clinical examinations, and questionnaires.
his was a monocentric, intra-individual study, that was performed in at least 45 valid cases (50% children ≥3 YO; 50% adults). Study duration was 168 days with five (5) visits (D0, D14, D28, D84 and D168) to the research center. Primary objective - Evaluation of the efficacy of LIPIKAR BAUME LIGHT AP+M in decrease the SCORAD in child and adult subjects with mild atopic dermatitis after 14 and 28 days under normal conditions of use; - Evaluation of the efficacy of LIPIKAR BAUME LIGHT AP+M in maintenance the SCORAD value in child and adult subjects with mild atopic dermatitis after 84 and 168 days under normal conditions of use. Secondary objective - Evaluation of flares quantity and severity during 84 and 168 days of use; - Clinical evaluation of the improvement of skin parameters such as erythema, oedema, oozing, excoriation, lichenification, dryness and desquamation of a lesional and non-lesional skin from the same individual site by dermatologist after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; - Self-assessment of the improvement of skin parameters such as itching, tingling, burning by subjects after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; - Evaluate the perceived efficacy, cosmeticity and acceptability through a subjective evaluation questionnaire after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; - Evaluation of the improvement in skin barrier function by the loss of transepidermic water through instrumental measurements with the Tewameter® equipment on AF and UAF after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; - Evaluation of the improvement of skin moisturizing through instrumental measurements with Corneometer® equipment on AF and UAF after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; - The folliculitis incidence after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; - Assessment of the improvement of the impact of quality of life through a DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) questionnaire after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days; - Assessment of global tolerance through clinical dermatological evaluation and reports performed by the subjects after using the product after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days. - Evaluation of total body skin dryness improvement after 14, 28, 84 and 168 days. - Illustrative clinical pictures of one or two affected areas.