3 Years Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Resin Composite Fixed Dental Prosthesis

Dental Prosthesis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Resin Composite Posterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Prospective Clinical Trial up to 3 Years

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04600297
• Other study ID #: 68869993-511.06-.E.150622
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 10, 2020
• Est. completion date: March 1, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: August 2021
• Source: Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
• Contact: Mehmet Muzaffer Ates, Prof. Dr.
• Phone: +90 212 453 48 00
• Email: mates[@]medipol.edu.tr
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In recent years there is a rapid increase in the use of computer aided design and production. Two main types of materials are used in the production of indirect CAD/CAM restorations namely resin composite based and ceramic ones. Mechanical properties and esthetics of ceramic materials are superior to resin composites but the advantages of intraoral repair, easy adjustments and polish of resin materials are undeniable. Improvements of mechanical properties of resin-based materials resulted in the development of resin composite blocks. 3D printed restorations, which can be performed as chairside in one session can be manufactured in case of any broken / chipping / debonding cases, without the need for repeated impression making. This saves time for the patient and the clinician. By using these 3D resin-based composite materials in fixed partial dentures, intraoral repairs can be performed. In addition, the high costs of burs and possible damage to the CAD/CAM blocks used in ceramic milling are eliminated when restoration are manufactured in printers with the DLP technology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of 3D printed posterior resin composite FDP restorations up to 3 years.

Description:

The study will be carried out as a prospective study, with assessment of the restorations after three year. The project includes 3-unit posterior fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) for 70 cases. Patients participating in the investigation are going to be informed by the "Clinicians" on the background and risk of the investigation. Patients have to give their written consent to participate in the investigation. The treatment procedure includes the following steps: Preparation scanning, colour determination, design of the restoration, printing the restoration, adjusting occlusion, finishing and polishing and cementation of the FDP. The control procedures: Two weeks after cementation, baseline control will be performed according to USPHS and FDI 2. The restorations will be evaluated at 3 years recall.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 70
• Est. completion date: March 1, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: December 1, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Need for a three-unit posterior FDP
• One missing tooth from the second premolar to the second molar where 1st molar is missing (pontic replacing 1st molar)
• Presence of opposing natural dentition (either intact or restored with intracoronal or extracoronal fixed restorations), and with a minimum of 20 teeth)
• Only FPD s with end abutments (No cantilever)
• Sufficient length of the clinical crown (>5 mm)
• No obvious untreated caries, dental health problems (regularly checked by a dentist)
• Good or moderate oral hygiene (plaque score of less than 30% in anterior region be-fore treatment)
• No untreated periodontal disease (only DPSI 1, 2)
• Abutment teeth are vital or endodontically treated with a sealed root filling to the apical region, and have to be without apical periodontitis for the past 6 months.
• Subjects had to be over the age of 18, be classified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I or ASA II, present with good oral hygiene, and be free of periodontal disease (probing depth and attachment levels within normal limits, no furcation involvement, and no mobility)
• Subjects had to agree to keep the scheduled recall appointments for data collection and maintenance and plan to stay in the area for at least 3 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients suffering from general health impairment
• Considerable horizontal and/or vertical mobility of teeth: tooth mobility index score 2 or - Considerable periodontal disease without treatment (DPSI 3-, 3+ and 4)
• Endodontic treatment with extensive loss of tooth tissue
• Subjects who presented with severe wear facets and/or reported parafunctional activi-ties such as clenching or nocturnal bruxism
• Subjects who were restored with a removable partial dental prosthesis (RPDP), unless the RPDP replaced the tooth that was planned to be restored in the study
• Subjects who were pregnant during the duration of the study
• Subjects who are known to be allergic to the ingredients of resin materials

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Composite Resins
• Dental Prosthesis

Intervention

Device:
• ELS Even Stronger (3D Printed Resin Composite)
Missing of one premolar cases will be restored using the 3D Printed resin composite (ELS Even Stronger, Saremco, Switzerland). The steps of the procedure: Preparation, scanning, colour determination, design of the restoration, printing the restoration, adjusting occlusion, finishing and polishing, cementation.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Turkey	Istanbul Medipol University, School of Dentistry	Istanbul

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital	Saremco Dental AG

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (15)

Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices. Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):162-169. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0258-1. Epub 2016 Jul 25. — View Citation

Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. — View Citation

El-Damanhoury HM, Haj-Ali RN, Platt JA. Fracture resistance and microleakage of endocrowns utilizing three CAD-CAM blocks. Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):201-10. doi: 10.2341/13-143-L. Epub 2014 Sep 30. — View Citation

Kamonwanon P, Hirose N, Yamaguchi S, Sasaki JI, Kitagawa H, Kitagawa R, Thaweboon S, Srikhirin T, Imazato S. SiO(2)-nanocomposite film coating of CAD/CAM composite resin blocks improves surface hardness and reduces susceptibility to bacterial adhesion. Dent Mater J. 2017 Jan 31;36(1):88-94. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-135. Epub 2016 Dec 6. — View Citation

Magne P, Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN. In vitro fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Sep;104(3):149-57. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60111-4. — View Citation

Magne P, Stanley K, Schlichting LH. Modeling of ultrathin occlusal veneers. Dent Mater. 2012 Jul;28(7):777-82. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 May 9. — View Citation

Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Oct;134(10):1382-90. — View Citation

Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009 Jan;28(1):44-56. Review. — View Citation

Rekow ED. Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137 Suppl:5S-6S. — View Citation

Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res. 2014 Dec;93(12):1232-4. doi: 10.1177/0022034514553976. Epub 2014 Oct 24. Review. — View Citation

Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN, Magne P. Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Apr;105(4):217-26. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60035-8. — View Citation

Shembish FA, Tong H, Kaizer M, Janal MN, Thompson VP, Opdam NJ, Zhang Y. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Jan 8. — View Citation

Yesil ZD, Alapati S, Johnston W, Seghi RR. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Jun;99(6):435-43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60105-5. — View Citation

Zimmermann M, Ender A, Egli G, Özcan M, Mehl A. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-fabricated and 3D-printed composite crowns as a function of material thickness. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jun;23(6):2777-2784. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2717-2. Epub 2018 Oct 27. — View Citation

Zimmermann M, Koller C, Reymus M, Mehl A, Hickel R. Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Particle-Filled Composite Resin CAD/CAM Partial Crowns after 24 Months. J Prosthodont. 2018 Oct;27(8):694-699. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12582. Epub 2017 Apr 19. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Modified FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria for dental restoration assessment	The FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria for dental restorations assessment, as it was published after consensus in 2007 and updated in 2010. The criteria were categorized into three groups: esthetic, functional and biological parameters. Each criterion can be expressed with five scores, three for acceptable and two for non-acceptable (one for reparable and one for replacement). The worst score of all items is retained as the overall score of the restoration, thus resulting in a single (ordinal) primary outcome. Two independent evaluators will evaluate the restorations by using modified FDI criteria.	3 years
Secondary	Plaque accumulation according to the Silness & Löe (1964) Plaque Index	0 = No plaque in the gingival area.; = A film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin and adjacent area of the tooth. The plaque may only be recognized by running a probe across the tooth surface.; = Moderate accumulation of soft deposits within the gingival pocket, on the gingival pocket, on the gingival margin and/or adjacent tooth surface, which can be seen by the naked eye.; = Abundance of soft matter within the gingival pocket and/or on the gingival margin and adjacent	3 years
Secondary	Gingival Inflammation according to the Silness & Löe (1964) Gingival Index.	0 = Normal gingival.; = Mild inflammation-slight change in colour, slight oedema. No bleeding on probing; = Moderate inflammation-redness, oedema and glazing. Bleeding on probing.; = Severe inflammation-marked redness and oedema. Ulceration. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding	3 years