Dental Occlusion Clinical Trial
— TIOTHPOTOOfficial title:
The Impact of the Head Position on the Occlusion of Implant-supported Fixed Restorations vs. Natural Dentition - a Cross-sectional Analysis
Verified date | October 2021 |
Source | University of Belgrade |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The development of a implantology leads to an increasing use of implants in the treatment of care for the loss of one or more teeth. The question is whether the existing guidelines, originally formulated for the occlusion of natural dentition and conventional prosthetic treatment can be applied to the implant prosthodonticsDue to initial differences in the vertical mobility of teeth and dental implants, present in the same dental arch, although the model of occlusion is ideal, undesirable premature occlusal contacts on the fixed dental restorations on implants may be present. Objective: To evaluate the effect of different head positions on dental occlusion of the natural teeth and fixed dental restorations on implants. Methods: Volunteers with complete dentition would be included in this study as the Control Group. The Study Group would include subjects with fixed dental restorations on implants in the transcanine region. A T Scan III System will be used for occlusal analysis.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 31 |
Est. completion date | September 10, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | September 1, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years to 55 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: For the Test Group - patients with implant-supported fixed restorations in at least one quadrant of the posterior region (pre-molar and molar) of both jaws at least for 1 year - patients with Angle Class I in MIP - patients who did not have orthodontic treatment For the Control group, the inclusion criteria were: - patients with completely dentate arches (not considering third molars) with a maximum of 4 tooth-supported restorations per dental arch). Exclusion Criteria: - patients with bruxism, detrimental habits, and mandibular parafunctional activities - patients with signs of temporomandibular dysfunction, trismus, or illness of the cervical spine - patients with a history indicating problems with alcohol or drugs or receiving any psychiatric treatment. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Serbia | Clinic for Prosthodontics, University of Belgrade Serbia | Belgrade |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Belgrade |
Serbia,
Afrashtehfar KI, Qadeer S. Computerized occlusal analysis as an alternative occlusal indicator. Cranio. 2016 Jan;34(1):52-7. doi: 10.1179/2151090314Y.0000000024. Epub 2014 Oct 16. Review. — View Citation
Chapman RJ, Maness WL, Osorio J. Occlusal contact variation with changes in head position. Int J Prosthodont. 1991 Jul-Aug;4(4):377-81. — View Citation
Goldstein G, Goodacre C, Taylor T. Occlusal Schemes for Implant Restorations: Best Evidence Consensus Statement. J Prosthodont. 2021 Apr;30(S1):84-90. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13319. Review. — View Citation
Sadowsky SJ. Occlusal overload with dental implants: a review. Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Jul 23;5(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0180-8. Review. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Changes in occlusal contacts distribution in 3 different head positions | Computerized occlusal analysis | Baseline-1 year | |
Primary | Changes in relative forces strength in 3 different head positions | Computerized occlusal analysis | Baseline-1 year |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06272474 -
Virtual Reproduction of Mandibular Movement for Assessing Occlusal Interferences and Adjustments
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06463405 -
Patient Perception and Oral Function of Implant Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04798729 -
Comparison of Two Different Digital Methods in Occlusal Analysis
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05471024 -
Occlusal Adjustment Time and Volume for Single Unit Fixed Prosthesis Fabricated With Different Virtual Mounting
|
N/A |