Dental Leakage Clinical Trial
Official title:
Adhesive Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Based Adhesive Systems
This study aimed to clinically evaluate the 3-years clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin based adhesive systems in Class V restorations.
The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performances between glass ionomer and resin based adhesive systems in Class V restorations for 3-years. The research question was as follows: Do glass ionomer adhesives in class V restorations present better clinical performances than resin based adhesive systems according to the modified United States Public Health Service (modified-USPHS) criteria? ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04848987 -
Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With a Self-adhesive, Self-etch or a Conventional Resin Cement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04679220 -
36-Months Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Room Temperature Resin Composite
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05383768 -
Clinical Evaluation of Preheated and Repeated Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03542019 -
Survival of Endocrowns Made From Different Ceramics
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03886727 -
Effectiveness of Rubber Dam Isolation Versus Cotton Roll Isolation on Bonded Fissure Sealant Retention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06377423 -
Comparison Between Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases
|
N/A |