Dental Implant Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Efficacy of New SOI Implant Surface for Immediately Loaded, Post-extractive Versus Delayed Implants
Verified date | February 2024 |
Source | Università degli Studi di Sassari |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical and radiographic of immediately loaded, immediate (post-extractive, test group) versus delayed (control group) implants with new SOI surface
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 70 |
Est. completion date | January 31, 2028 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Any patient with at least one hopeless tooth in the mandible or maxilla, located between premolars, with intact post extractive alveolus. The implants must to engage at least 3 (mandible) to 5 (maxilla) mm of residual native bone over the socket. - Patients with 18 years or older, and able to sign an informed consent. - Smokers will be included and categorized into: 1) non smokers; 2) moderate smokers (smoking up to 10 cigarettes/day); 3) heavy smokers (smoking more than 11 cigarettes/day). Heavy smokers will be excluded. - Biotype will be categorized in thin (=1 mm), medium (>1 - <2 mm) or thick (=2 mm). Exclusion Criteria: - General contraindications to implant surgery. - Patients irradiated in the head and neck area. - Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patients. - Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. - Patients with untreated periodontitis. - Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation. - Uncontrolled diabetes. - Heavy smokers. - Pregnancy or nursing. - Substance abuser. - Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations. - Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for implant placement. - Patients with infection and or inflammation in the area intended for implant placement. - Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol cannot be properly adhered to. - Patients referred only for implant placement and cannot be followed ant the treating centre. - Patients unable to be followed for 5 years |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | Marco Tallarico | Sassari |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Università degli Studi di Sassari | Dr. Aurea M. I. Lumbau, Dr. Dario Melodia, Dr. Milena Pisano, Prof. Edoardo Baldoni, Prof. Silvio Mario Meloni |
Italy,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of prosthesis failure | Whether it will not be possible to place the prosthesis because of implant failure or a prosthesis that has to be remade for any reason. | Up to 5 years | |
Primary | Number of implant failure | defined as implant mobility and/or any infection dictating implant removal, and/or implant fracture and/or any other mechanical complication rendering the implant unusable. The stability of each individual implant will be measured by the local blinded outcome assessors manually tightening the screws with a torque of 30 Ncm at abutment connection, immediately loading, at 1,3 and 5 years after loading for the partial fixed prostheses. Once the single crowns will be cemented, their stability will be assessed by rocking the crown with the handles of two dental instruments. | Up to 5 years | |
Primary | Number of complications | Technical (fracture of the framework and/or the veneering material, screw loosening, etc.) and/or biologic (pain, swelling, suppuration, peri-implantitis, etc.) complication will be considered. | Up to 5 years | |
Secondary | Rate of peri-implant marginal bone level changes | Peri-implant marginal bone level changes will be assessed on periapical radiographs took with the paralleling technique at implant placement, at initial loading, 1,3 and 5 years after loading. Ideally digital radiographs should be taken, otherwise radiographs on conventional films will be scanned into TIFF format with a 600 dpi resolution, and stored in a personal computer. Peri-implant marginal bone levels will be measured using the Scion Image (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD, USA) software. The software will be calibrated for every single image using the known distance of the first two consecutive threads. Measurements of the mesial and distal bone crest level adjacent to each implant will be made to the nearest 0.01 mm. Reference points for the linear measurements will be: the coronal margin of the implant collar and the most coronal point of bone-to-implant contact. Bone levels will be measured. | At 1,3 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Valuation of patient satisfaction | Patients will answer the following questions (separately for each implant):
Are you satisfied with the function of your implant-supported prostheses? Possible answers: yes absolutely, yes partly, not sure, not really, absolutely not. Are you satisfied with the aesthetic outcome of your implant-supported prostheses? Possible answers: yes absolutely, yes partly, not sure, not really, absolutely not. Would you undergo the same therapy again? Possible answers: "yes" or "no". |
At 1,3 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Rate of implant stability quotient (ISQ) | ISQ was measured and recorded using the IS3 (Osstem), at implant placement, at implants exposure, at the impression time, and prosthetic loading. | Up to 5 years | |
Secondary | Valuation of soft tissue thickness and amount of keratinized tissue | The soft tissue biotype will be investigated by the same surgeon at the surgical procedures using a periodontal probe into the sulcus. Greater will be the thickness of the tissue, smaller will be transparency of the periodontal probe. The amount of keratinized tissue will be evaluated 1 year after surgical procedures using a periodontal probe. This outcome will be evaluated according to the distance from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction | 1,3 and 5 years | |
Secondary | Number of PES score | Esthetic evaluation of occlusal and vestibular pictures will take every years after definite loading was done following the pink esthetic score (PES). In brief, the PES score evaluates seven variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiencies, soft tissue color and texture. A 0-1-2 scoring system was used, 0 being the lowest and 2 being the highest value, with a maximum achievable score of 14 per dental unit. | 1,3 and 5 years |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05053958 -
Using Superimposition of Intra-Oral Scan and CBCT in Single Implant Restorations in Aesthetic Zone.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04367766 -
Management of the Fresh Extraction Socket in the Aesthetic Area
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06296459 -
Radiographic Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Following Closed Sinus Augmentation
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06247098 -
Evaluation of Sinus Augmentation Bone Healing Using Autograft and Xenograft Compared to Xenograft Alone
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05988281 -
Success of Implant Restorations After Immediate or Delayed Implant Placement With/Without Ridge Preservation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04340830 -
The Effect of Smoking on Dimensional Changes of Free Gingival Graft Around Dental Implants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06404385 -
Accuracy of Static Computer-assisted Implant Surgery in Distal Free-end Scenarios
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05405179 -
Simultaneous Dental Implant in Free Vascularized Bone Flaps for Jaw Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06138392 -
Long-term Study in Early Loaded Hydrophilic Surface Implants
|
||
Completed |
NCT04332679 -
Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06127576 -
Biomechanical Informational Effect of Innovative Double or Triple Dental Abutment-implant: Case-series
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06059573 -
The Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement Using Robotic System-assisted Surgery and Freehand Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06068231 -
A Study of Early Loading of Implants in the Maxillary Anterior Region With Alveolar Bone Defects
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03774888 -
To Compare Different Soft Tissue Grafts at the Time of Lateral Ridge Augmentation Procedure.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02864862 -
Esthetic Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Combine With Soft Tissue Augmentation
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02444052 -
Evaluation of Zimmer Puros® Allograft vs. Creos™ Allograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04861662 -
Effect of Keratinized Mucosa on Peri-implant Health
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04541641 -
Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03888339 -
Influence of Abutment Shape on Peri-implant Marginal Bone Loss
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06231134 -
Diode Laser 940 nm Versus Electrosurgical Device During Second Stage Implant Surgery on Bone and Soft Tissue Healing
|
N/A |