Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique.

Dental Implant Clinical Trial

Official title:

Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04541641
• Other study ID #: PER6-3-1
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 1, 2020
• Est. completion date: August 1, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: September 2020
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study will compare between osteotome technique and New Reverse Drilling Technique in the placement of dental implant in posterior maxilla , primary outcome will be Implant stability that will be measured by Periotest device . follow up for 6 month.

secondary outcomes will be crestal bone loss , pain and swelling.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 28
• Est. completion date: August 1, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: August 1, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 21 Years to 50 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria:

1. Partially edentulous patients in the maxillary posterior region.

2. Systemically healthy patient.

3. Presence of proper inter-arch space for placement of the implant prosthetic part.

4. Sufficient bone height and width for implant placement (bone height =10mm and bone width =6mm).

5. Non-smoker.

6. Patients who are = 20 years old.

7. Good oral hygiene.

8. Acceptance of a one year follow-up period.

9. Informed consent is provided by the patient.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Patients with systemic conditions that may interfere with implant stability,

2. Patients with local pathological defects related to the area of interest.

3. Unmotivated, uncooperative patients with poor oral hygiene.

4. Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as alcoholism or parafunctional habits.

5. Inadequate inter-arch space for implant prosthetic part

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Dental Implant
• Mouth, Edentulous

Intervention

Procedure:
• New Reverse Drilling technique
a new technique of dental implant drilling that promote osseodensification by rotating the drills anti-clockwise rather than clockwise to promote bone condensation rather than bone cutting
• osteotome technique
a technique for dental implant placement by using the osteotome to condense the bone and create an osteotome rather than cutting the bone

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	implant stability	the stability of the dental implant when placed in the maxilla of the patient and it will be measured by periotest	6 months
Secondary	crestal bone loss	amount of bone loss around the implant . measured in MM with CBVT radiograph	6 monthz