Dental Implant Failure Clinical Trial
Official title:
Accuracy of Computer-assisted Template-based Implant Placement Using Conventional Impression and Scan Model or Digital Impression: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Proper implant position has a significant impact in esthetic and functional outcomes of
implant-supported restorations. Computer-assisted template-based implant placement (guided
surgery) have become increasingly popular due to improved planning and the higher transfer
accuracy of the virtual plan to the surgical site compared with freehand insertion or
freehand final drilling. Digital impressions replace the need for traditional materials that
can be inconvenient and messy for patients. To the best of our knowledge, at the time of
planning this study, there were no published RCTs evaluating a fully digital approach for
computer-assisted template-based implant placement.
The aim of the present study is to compare early implant failure, template-related
complications, and virtual planning accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant
placement using conventional impression and scan model or digital impression.
The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference between these interventions.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | December 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - fully or partially edentulous patient, aged 18 years or older, able to sign an informed consent, in need of an implant-supported fixed restoration will be considered eligible for this study. Any potential implant locations based on individual patient requirements will be considered eligible in the present trial. No set location or group of locations will be excluded. Exclusion Criteria: - general medical contraindication to oral surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologist, ASA, class III or IV); irradiation in the head and neck area less than one year before implantation; psychiatric problems; alcohol or drug abuse; pregnant or nursing; untreated periodontitis; severe bruxism or clenching; uncontrolled diabetes; poor oral hygiene and motivation; and inability to complete the follow-up. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Clínica Odontológica de la Universitat de Valencia, Fundación Lluis Alcanyis | Valencia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Valencia |
Spain,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Linear distance between planned and real implant apex position | The change in mm between the apex of the planned and the final (real) position of the implant. | Immediate post-surgery | |
Primary | Angle between the planned and real implant axis | Change in angulation between the planned and the final (real) position of the implant. | Immediate post-surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04045574 -
DAMP1: The 1T1T Concept Versus Conventional Implant Loading Protocol
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02369562 -
A Retrospective Analysis of Failures of Oral Implants
|
||
Completed |
NCT02374216 -
A Prospective Analysis of Failures of Oral Implants
|
N/A |