Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT02274142 |
| Other study ID # |
MICARDEC |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
N/A
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
October 2014 |
| Est. completion date |
October 2016 |
Study information
| Verified date |
March 2021 |
| Source |
University of Sao Paulo |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The aim of this RCT is to evaluate the survival of different glass ionomer cement in
minimally invasive restorations, with different handling characteristics: hand-mixed versus
encapsulated.
Description:
Detailed Description: This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the School
of Dentistry (University of São Paulo, Brazil) and written informed consent will be obtained
from the parents or legal guardians. The sample size was calculated based on the data
obtained in a systematic review, which reported average longevity of 78% after 2 years of
follow up (mean survival of occlusal and occlusoproximal surfaces). The minimum difference of
15% in the success rate between the control and treatment groups after 2 years of follow-up,
with and α of 5% and power (strength) of 80% using paired test. As more than one tooth per
children might be included, we must add a 20% for clustering. Adding 20% for possible losses
the final estimate is 116 teeth per group, reaching a final sample of 232 teeth.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who have sought treatment in the School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo;
- Children between 3 and 10 years old without systemic diseases;
- Children presenting at least one dentin caries cavity in primary teeth (occlusal or
oclusoproximal) with no signs of pulp involvement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children whose parents did not agree to participate in the study;
- Children with behavioural issues at the initial exam or who did not assent to
participate in the study.
Implementation:
All the occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations will be performed by two operators on the
dental chair. The operators will be assisted by another dentist, who will be previously
trained to mix the GIC according to the manufacturers' protocol. The children will be
randomly assigned into two groups: Hand-mixed and encapsulated materials.
Treatment procedure:
The restorative technique will be performed according to the Minimal Intervention Dentistry.
No local anaesthesia will be used during treatment. Rotary instruments can be used to open or
to expand the cavity opening, removing only enamel. Infected carious dentin will be removed
with hand instruments. The use of hand instruments on the dentin surface results in a smear
layer and need to be removed by the use of dentine conditioner. The liquid component of the
hand-mixed powder-liquid GIC, containing the acid component, will be used and saliva
isolation will be done with cotton wool rolls. The cavities will be restored with one of the
two GIC brands: Fuji IX (GC Europe, Leuven, BE) and EQUIA (GC Europe, Leuven, BE). A thin
layer of petroleum jelly will be rubbed over the index finger and the restoration will be
pressed for 20 seconds. The material will include sealing pits and the fissure. After
preparing for a balanced occlusion, a new layer of petroleum jelly will be applied to the GIC
restoration. The amount of GIC used, element number, cavity dimension and dmft will be
recorded. The duration of the restorative procedure will be recorded with a stopwatch. The
participating children will be instructed not to eat for one hour after the restoration is
placed.
Evaluation:
The success of the restorations will be evaluated after 6 months according to the Frencken
and Holmgren criteria for occlusal surfaces, and modified version of Roeleveld et al. (2006)
criteria for occlusoproximal surfaces. A restoration will be considered as 'failure' when
there is a defect in the filling when secondary caries is observed, when the restoration is
not present or when the pulp is inflamed. When the restoration is still present or a slight
defect is observed, it will be considered as 'success'. When the tooth is unavailable for
evaluation, it will be censored. All evaluations will be carried out by two independent
evaluators, who did not restore the cavities, trained and calibrated by a benchmark.
Estimation of cost-effectiveness:
The material cost (GICs) will be estimated per restoration. The average cost per restoration
will be estimated. Costs of equipment, autoclave and hand instruments, disposables (hand
gloves, face masks, cotton wool rolls), articulating paper and petroleum jelly used for the
restorations are equal for both GIC groups and will be excluded. There will be no labour
costs for the operators.