View clinical trials related to Dental Caries Class II.
Filter by:to evaluate and compare the clinical performance and periodontal responses of four commercially available one-step universal adhesives with different formulations in Class II composite restorations over a three-year period.
evaluate the clinical performance of EQUIA Forte ® ( a HVGIC) and Plafique® Bulk Flow composite resin when placed in class II cavities in primary molars.
The aim of the present study is to assess Flowable Giomer Beautifil Flow Plus X (Shofu Dental Corporation, Japan) and Glass-hybrid-added HVGIC, Equia Forte (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in class II cavities of primary molars regarding the following objectives: The primary objective To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Flowable Giomer Beautifil Flow Plus X (Shofu Dental Corporation, Japan) and Glass-hybrid-added HVGIC, Equia Forte (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in restoring class II cavities of primary molars after 3,6, and 12 months. The secondary objective To assess the effect of different independent variables on the treatment outcome of the experimental restorative materials. Research question: Is there a difference in the clinical performance between flowable giomers and highly viscous glass ionomer in restoring class II cavities of primary molars? Null Hypothesis There is no difference in the clinical performance between Flowable Giomer Beautifil Flow Plus X (Shofu Dental Corporation, Japan) and Glass-hybrid-added HVGIC, Equia Forte (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) after one year of follow up.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of using orthodontic bands with glass ionomer cement to arrest or reverse interproximal lesions as a preventive treatment compared to monitoring and oral hygiene. The investigators hypothesize that placing orthodontic bands with glass ionomer cement will arrest and possibly remineralize incipient carious lesions compared to teeth that are being monitored without intervention.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative in Class I and Class II restorations compared to the conventional incremental technique using Filtek Z350XT over the period of 2 years. The null hypothesis of this study is that the bulk-fill composite will exhibit same result and clinical performance as conventional composite using incremental technique which has been used widely by dentists nowadays.