Accuracy of 3D Printed Indirect Bonding Trays - an in Vivo Study

Dental Bonding Clinical Trial

Official title:

3D Printed Indirect Bonding Trays - Accuracy of Rigid Versus Resilient Resin a Clinical in Vivo Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04623983
• Other study ID #: 1485/2020
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 15, 2021
• Est. completion date: December 15, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: April 2022
• Source: Medical University of Vienna
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Objective In addition to examining the transmission accuracy of rigid and non-rigid IDB's the aim of the study is to determine the 'lost rate' during the placement. The 'lost rate' is the percentage frequency of brackets that have no adhesion to the model after the bonding has taken place. Hypothesis The main hypothesis does not describe a significant deviation of the digitally planned to the actually placed bracket position in directions and angles described. The secondary hypothesis is the assumption of no significant difference between the accuracy and lost rate of the two materials. Method 24 orthodontic patients treated with multibracket appliance will be included for the planned study. In order to increase the reproducibility of the acquired data four different model situations are included. Objective The aim of the study is a scientific examination of the accuracy of digital printed bonding trays using two materials to support the decision process of the potential user and their dental laboratories. The study allows an insight into the technical manufacturing process and its workflow.

Description:

Orthodontic clinicians distinguish between direct and indirect brackets placement. Using the direct procedure, brackets are placed on the patients tooth without a transfer appliance. While the indirect method takes advantage of placing the brackets on a dental model under laboratory surrounding. The conventional method of indirect bracket positioning uses plaster models from the treated dental arches. Following the positioned brackets are transferred from the model to the patient mouth using a so called indirect bonding trays (IDB). IDB's represent a transfer aid for the bracket placement. Advantages of this procedure can be an improvement of the tooth axis (facial axis) assessment especially since the model is freely movable in space further an optimized visibility with laboratory lighting. The placement on the digital model offers a variety of options with regards to measurement, magnification, contrast adjustment and exact referencing on the neighboring tooth. Digital Workflow: Under the broad term of rapid prototyping developments of applications allow a fully digital workflow while planning and manufacturing IDB's. The construction of bonding trays is based on a digital 3D model and is further manufactured using stereolithographic 3D printers. Similar to conventional IDB's there is the question of the optimal material with regards to transfer accuracy, dimensional stability and clinical applicability with 3D printed IDB's. Besides the question of transfer accuracy, the planned study will document the percentual number of brackets which failed to bond with the corresponding tooth (Lost Rate) using two different materials. Objective: The aim of the study is a scientific examination of the accuracy of digital printed bonding trays using two materials to support the decision process of the potential user and their dental laboratories. The study allows an insight into the technical manufacturing process and its workflow.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 24
• Est. completion date: December 15, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: January 15, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 11 Years to 17 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Little Index 2,
• Little Index 3
• Little Index 4
• spacing

Exclusion Criteria:

• epilepsy
• periodontal disease
• infraocclusion
• agenesis
• tooth impaction

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Dental Bonding

Intervention

Device:
• bonding tray
Orthodontic bonding tray

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Austria	Medical University of Vienna	Vienna

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Medical University of Vienna

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Austria, 

References & Publications (3)

Castilla AE, Crowe JJ, Moses JR, Wang M, Ferracane JL, Covell DA Jr. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):607-14. doi: 10.2319/070113-484.1. Epub 2014 Feb 20. — View Citation

Oliveira NS, Gribel BF, Neves LS, Lages EMB, Macari S, Pretti H. Comparison of the accuracy of virtual and direct bonding of orthodontic accessories. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Sep 5;24(4):46-53. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.046-053.oar. — View Citation

Schmid J, Brenner D, Recheis W, Hofer-Picout P, Brenner M, Crismani AG. Transfer accuracy of two indirect bonding techniques-an in vitro study with 3D scanned models. Eur J Orthod. 2018 Sep 28;40(5):549-555. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy006. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Accuracy of indirectly placed brackets via indirect bonding trays	3D Offset of indirectly bonded brackets	orthodontic bracket placement immediately after bonding
Secondary	Lost rate	Non-bonded brackets	orthodontic bracket placement immediately after bonding