Spinal Stenosis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Consecutive Case Series of One-Level Lumbar Fusions With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation and the Trabecular Metal™ Intervertebral Cage Using Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA)
The purpose of this study is to gather information on the effectiveness of a new spine implant for patients who require spinal fusion surgery. Based on this information, we hope to create a standard of good performance, or benchmark, against which future studies on this spine implant can be compared. By creating this benchmark we hope to improve care for patients who require spinal fusion surgery.
For patients in whom a spinal fusion is indicated, the posterior lumbar interbody fusion
(PLIF) may be recommended to restore stability to the affected spinal segment1. Pioneered by
a Dr.Cloward in the 1940s to treat painful intervertebral discs damaged by degeneration,
PLIF involves removal of the entire nuclear portion of the disc and subsequent replacement
with multiple blocks of transplanted bone. The purpose of the fusion is to eliminate or
reduce the amount of the motion at the affected site, and, therefore, the source of pain.
Four major intervertebral cages have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
for use in humans: the Brantigan Interbody fusion Cage, the Ray Threaded Fusion Cage, the
Bagby and Kuslich cage, and, most recently, the Trabecular Metal™ Cage. Comprised of 98
percent tantalum and 2 percent vitreous carbon, Trabecular Metal™ has the highest
coefficient of friction of any implant material on the market, allowing for optimal initial
implant-bone fit. Furthermore, the unique porous structure of Trabecular Metal™ provides
significantly more space for tissue ingrowth to occur, facilitating a more cohesive
implant-bone interface as well as long-term stability of the implant.
Long-term follow up data on the efficacy of the Brantigan Interbody fusion cage, Ray
Threaded Fusion cage, and Bagby and Kuslich cages are limited, with the most rigorous
studies (i.e. controlled prospective studies) typically providing outcomes approximately 2
years post-surgery. Overall, these studies show that, while existing intervertebral cages
have made significant advances in terms of addressing the disadvantages associated with
traditional bone grafting/fixation techniques, problems continue to persist. Through
comprehensive and accurate clinical evaluation of the Trabecular Metal™ intervertebral cage,
the Research Team hopes to document advances in the PLIF technique, thereby informing
current research as well as clinical practice.
The primary goal of the proposed research is to gather data on the clinical efficacy of the
Trabecular Metal™ Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) cage with pedicle screw
instrumentation for the treatment of one-level lumbar spine fusions. Based on this pilot
data, we hope to establish a level of acceptable clinical performance for the Trabecular
Metal™ cage, a benchmark against which subsequent investigations can be compared.
Direct surgical exploration is considered the most reliable method for accurately
determining fusion success, both from a structural and functional perspective, following
spinal fusion surgery. Unfortunately, this method is highly invasive, costly and seldom
used. Furthermore, surgical exploration does not provide any longitudinal information as to
the stability of the implant, including the monitoring of any occurrence of migration.
In contrast, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis(RSA)can detect the presence or absence
of mobility between intervertebral segments (i.e. functional stability of the fusion) with a
high degree of accuracy. RSA is a radiographic technique that uses small tantalum balls
implanted into the patient's bone to measure micromotion (<1 mm) at the bone - implant
interface, something which is not possible to do reliably using regular x-ray techniques.
RSA provides a method for detecting inferior implant designs or cement formulations using
only a small number of patients before release of these products into large clinical trials.
RSA has been in use for several decades,and its safety is well documented.A computerized,
digital RSA system has recently been installed and calibrated at our center. Its measurement
capabilities have been rigorously validated, and it is currently being used to assess a new
knee implant design. Expansion of the system to include spine RSA can be easily
accomplished.
;
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06290908 -
RPE-P/TLIF for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03223701 -
Efficacy of Using Solum IV and BMC With GFC in TLIF
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03883022 -
Vancomycin Powder Combined With Autogenous Bone Graft as a Prevention for Post-operative Infection for Spine Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02902380 -
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Neuroendocrine Stress Hormone Release and Heart Rate Variability in Patients Undergoing Major Spinal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06024785 -
Vertebropexy - Randomized-controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06000319 -
Natural Matrix Protein™ (NMP™) Fibers in Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion
|
||
Completed |
NCT02558621 -
New Robotic Assistance System for Spinal Fusion Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02454400 -
Pre-surgery Physiotherapy for Patients With Specific Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01377623 -
Pilot Study on the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Inflammatory Responses in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00996073 -
Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of NeoFuse in Subjects Requiring Lumbar Interbody Fusion
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00974623 -
Bone Graft Materials Observational Registry
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00320619 -
Epsilon-Aminocaproaic Acid to Reduce the Need for Blood Transfusions During and Following Spine Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00022776 -
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Spinal Stenosis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06060821 -
Validity and Reliability of the 2-minute Step Test in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04552145 -
Physical Therapy vs Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04379921 -
Improving Spine Surgical Care With Real-Time Objective Patient Tracking Using the Apple Watch
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04315090 -
Post-surgical Outcomes Measure Using the ERAS Protocol for Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
|
||
Completed |
NCT04591249 -
Physical Activity Intervention for Patients Following Lumbar Spine Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04601363 -
Personalized Spine Study Group (PSSG) Registry
|
||
Completed |
NCT04193488 -
Mid-Transverse Process to Pleural (MTP) Block and Erector Spinal Plan (ESP) Block in Spinal Surgery
|
N/A |