Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this split-mouth study was to compare the efficacy of using Bio-active cement versus Packable glass ionomer for cementation of posterior zirconia pediatric crowns.


Clinical Trial Description

Restoration of pulp treated or badly broken down deciduous teeth with full coverage restoration have shown superior success rate to all other restorative materials.

Restoration of deciduous teeth with esthetic full coverage restoration has been a challenging aim especially for the more functionally loaded posterior teeth. Due to the continuous increase in socio-economic standards; restoring posterior teeth with esthetic restoration is on high demand nowadays.

The recently introduced zirconia pediatric crowns have been very promising in terms of strength and toughness. Clinical trials on maxillary incisors have shown very high success rates in terms of retention and gingival health.

The problem of restoring posterior deciduous teeth with pre-fabricated zirconia crowns is that its retention is only and totally dependent on luting cement, in addition to the problem of the deteriorated gingival condition around crowns in general.

Being recently introduced to the market; there have not been any clinical trials studying retention of zirconia posterior pediatric crowns published yet.

Recently introduced bio-active cement [NuSmile® BioCemâ„¢] is claimed by the manufacturer to be the solution of this problem due to the shock absorbing effect, bioactive components, and antimicrobial effect making it tougher than traditional cements and more gingival friendly.

Also, experienced clinicians have found that packable glass ionomer gives very acceptable results for retention of zirconia pediatric crowns. This may be due to the fact that, pre-fabricated pediatric crown is not well adapted to the prepared tooth creating a greater gap between the prepared tooth and the crown, resulting in a greater film thickness of luting cement, which may benefit from the stronger, tougher and less soluble packable glass ionomer rather than the conventional glass ionomer cement for cementation of zirconia crowns.

There is no clear evidence whether it's better to cement zirconia based crowns with conventional or adhesive cement; and to the investigator's knowledge, there is no data available for the best clinical practice in cementation of zirconia pediatric crowns; and so, this study was carried out to compare the effectiveness of bio-active cement with packable glass ionomer when used for cementation of zirconia pediatric crowns. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03993431
Study type Interventional
Source Fayoum University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date July 2015
Completion date December 2018

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT03908489 - Evaluation of Post-operative Pain After Vital Pulpotomy in Primary Molars Using Allium Sativum Oil Versus MTA N/A
Recruiting NCT03563534 - Treatment of Primary Molars With Deep Caries Using Silver Diamine Fluoride Phase 4
Completed NCT05167123 - Pulp Capping in Primary Molars Using TheraCal (LC) Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT03568474 - Silver Diamine Fluoride After Minimal Caries Removal Technique in Asymptomatic Young Permanent Teeth With Deep Caries Phase 4
Completed NCT04005872 - Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Nano Silver Fluoride Versus Calcium Hydroxide in Indirect Pulp Treatment N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04052685 - Selective Removal to Soft Dentine vs Selective Removal to Firm Dentine for Deep Posterior Caries Lesions N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06293521 - Clinical and Radiographic Success Rate of Pulpotomy Versus Pulpectomy for Management of Primary Teeth With Deep Caries Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT06378814 - Outcome of Selective & Nonselective Caries Removal in Permanent Teeth N/A
Completed NCT03885271 - Outcomes of the Hall Technique and Conventional Pulp Therapy for the Management of Caries in Primary Molars N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06219824 - Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bioceramic Putty MTA Versus MTA in Pulpotomy of Immature Permanent Molars Phase 3
Completed NCT04262076 - Remineralization of Caries Affected Dentin N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03186690 - Similar Outcomes of Vital Pulp Therapy Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate or Biodentineâ„¢ N/A
Recruiting NCT06256601 - Clinical Investigation of Effectiveness of a Calcium Silicate Cement N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05733468 - TheraCal LC Coronal Pulpotomy and MTA Coronal Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Molars Phase 4
Completed NCT03631277 - Indirect Pulp Treatment of Young Permanent Molars Using Photo-Activated Oral Disinfection Versus Calcium Hydroxide N/A
Completed NCT02084433 - Comparison of Intraosseous Anaesthesia Using a Computerized System (QuickSleeper) to Conventional Anesthesia N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06171776 - Evaluation of Conservative Management of Teeth With Deep Cavitated Carious Lesions Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03737201 - Influence of Ozone Application in Stepwise Excavation Procedure of Primary Molars With Deep Carious Lesion N/A
Completed NCT04265833 - Evaluation of Three Different Pulp Capping Materials in Indirect Pulp Treatment of Primary Teeth N/A
Recruiting NCT02286388 - Multicenter Trial Comparing One-step Partial Caries Removal to Complete Caries Removal for the Treatment of Deep Carious Lesions in Permanent Teeth. (DECAT : DEep CAries Treatment). Phase 3