View clinical trials related to Deep Caries.
Filter by:The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the clinical performance of a calcium silicate used in the treatment of deep caries lesions. Individuals participating in the research will be selected from patients with at least one deep dentin caries (D3) who apply to the Restorative Dentistry Clinic of Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry. The age range will be range 18-45. The teeth to be restored will be evaluated clinically and radiographically. A rubber dam will be used during the treatment. After the removal of enamel, carious tissue at the lateral walls of cavities will be removed to hard dentin using round and single-use round steel burs operating at low speed in all groups. A reasonable amount of soft carious tissue will be left over the pulp. In test (Calcium silicate) and control(calcium hydroxide) groups, after caries removal, respective material will be applied on the pulpal floor. Then, materials will be sealed by resin-modified glass ionomer cement and permanent restoration will be performed. Evaluation will be conducted after 6, 12, and 18 months.
this clinical trial is conducted to compare between deep marginal acquistion by the means of thermacut bur Vs. functional crown lengthening in exposing deep subgingival interproximal cervical lesions
The goal of this prospective, observational clinical cohort study is to study the effect of the preoperative condition of the tooth on the outcome of partial removal of carious tissue in mature teeth in adults. The main questions the study aims to answer are: - Do preoperative symptoms affect the outcome? - Does the depth of the carious lesion affect the outcome? One hundred participants will be recruited. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be asked to give their informed consent to participate in the study. Partial carious tissue removal will be performed regardless of participation in the study because selective carious tissue removal is the standard treatment of choice for a vital tooth with a deep carious lesion according to the Finnish national treatment guidelines. Participants will be asked to fill in a questionnaire regarding symptoms 7 days post-treatment. The teeth will then be followed up for 12-24 months. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the success between i) deep and extremely deep carious lesions and ii) initial and mild pulpitis.
450 healthy children with primary teeth of deep carious lesions without signs or symptomes of irreverisible pulp damage was selected randompy divoded into 3 groups each of 150 children that inder go vital pulp therapy through pulpotomy,direct pulp capping or indirect pulp capping using MTA as capping material for each modality then followed up for 2 years or more
Objectives: To evaluate and compare clinical and radiographic success of the selective removal to soft dentine technique in one step using calcium silicate cement (Biodentine) vs. no indirect pulp capping material in patients with deep caries lesions in mature permanent posterior teeth with normal or reversible pulpitis after a 2 year follow-up. Evaluate the integrity of the resin composite restorations using FDI criteria. Material and methods: selective removal to soft dentine in one visit will be performed in 104 blinded patients that will be randomly allocated into 2 study arms, 52 patients will constitute the Biodentine group and 52 the No material group. Clinical examination will be performed to obtain pre-, intra- and postoperative data, including vitality test results, periapical status and risk of caries of the patients. Periapical and bitewing radiographs will be taken before treatment (T-0), at 1 month (T-1), 6 months (T-2), 12 months (T-3) and 24 months (T-4). Restorations will be assessed using the FDI criteria at the same follow up periods.
Untreated dental caries is a worldwide pandemic (Edelstein, 2006). Due to limited financial resources, poor access to basic oral care, and the high cost of restorative treatment, children of low-income nations have their general health, social well-being, and education opportunities affected by untreated dental caries (Baelum et al., 2007). Traditional treatment of cavitated dentin lesions advocates complete removal of the decayed structure, i.e. the infected and affected dentin layers. During this procedure, however, a significant quantity of the dental structure is removed, and the pulp tissue may be exposed. In light of this, the complete removal of all decayed structures from a tooth with cavitated lesions is no longer seen as mandatory, as this increases the chance of pulp exposure, post-operative pain and weakens the tooth structure, and there is growing evidence to support incomplete removal of decayed tissue prior to the restoration of the cavity. It is argued, however, that carious lesions remaining in the cavity must be completely sealed in order to prevent their progression (Yee et al., 2009). Arresting Caries Treatment (ACT) has been proposed to oversee untreated dental caries in children of disadvantaged communities. Treatment of carious lesions based on minimally invasive technique methods aim to prevent their progression and preserve pulp vitality by means of standards of anticipation, remineralization and minimal intervention in the dental tissue (Bedi and Sardo-Infirri, 1999).
This clinical trial is a national multicenter randomized controlled trial performed in parallel groups aiming to validate a treatment that preserves pulp vitality of mature permanent posterior teeth through partial removal of carious tissue and restoring tooth structure using a simple filling in one session, thus delaying premature tooth aging. Two successive randomizations will be performed (allocation ratio 1:1); firstly for the type of excavation carried out (partial vs. complete caries removal) and secondly for the nature of the adhesive used (antibacterial adhesive vs. non-antibacterial adhesive). The second randomization will not be carried out for teeth requiring endodontic treatment after the first randomization. The study's primary objective will be to compare, at 1 year of follow-up, the efficacy (binary success criteria) of partial caries removal versus complete caries removal in occlusal or proximal deep lesions of mature permanent posterior teeth (bicuspids and molars except third molars). Secondary objectives will include the comparison, at 1 year of follow-up, of the efficacy (binary success criteria) of an antibacterial two-step self-etch adhesive versus a traditional non-antibacterial two-step self-etch adhesive. Another secondary objective will be to compare, at two and three years of follow-up, the efficacy of partial versus complete caries removal. The primary outcome is the success of the caries removal protocol at one year, measured according to 5 FDI criteria, while the secondary outcome is the contribution of the functional and biological dimensions of the 5 FDI criteria items to determining success or failure of the treatment. The outcome of success will be the same for all objectives, primary and secondary.