Auditory Training With Speech Related Acoustic Cues Using Psychophysical Testing

Deafness Clinical Trial

Official title:

Auditory Training With Speech Related Acoustic Cues Using Psychophysical Testing

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03867032
• Other study ID #: Zhou_R01_study5
• Status: Withdrawn
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 2022
• Est. completion date: June 2023

Study information

• Verified date: April 2023
• Source: East Carolina University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

In this study, the investigators will evaluate whether auditory training with speech-related acoustic features in psychophysical testing will help CI subjects improve speech recognition. The primary endpoint is the speech recognition measures.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Withdrawn
• Enrollment: 0
• Est. completion date: June 2023
• Est. primary completion date: December 26, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 10 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Native speakers of English

• Cochlear Nucleus cochlear implant users or Advanced Bionics users

• Postlingually deafened

• Has had device experience for at least one year

• Can be child or adult at the time of enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

• None

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Deafness

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Auditory training
Training with psychophysical tests (amplitude modulation detection on single electrodes) for improving speech recognition

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
East Carolina University

References & Publications (18)

Banai K, Hornickel J, Skoe E, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N. Reading and subcortical auditory function. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2699-707. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp024. Epub 2009 Mar 17. — View Citation

Baumann S, Joly O, Rees A, Petkov CI, Sun L, Thiele A, Griffiths TD. The topography of frequency and time representation in primate auditory cortices. Elife. 2015 Jan 15;4:e03256. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03256. — View Citation

Boebinger D, Evans S, Rosen S, Lima CF, Manly T, Scott SK. Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jan;137(1):378-87. doi: 10.1121/1.4904537. — View Citation

Chen JK, Chuang AY, McMahon C, Hsieh JC, Tung TH, Li LP. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e793-800. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3620. Epub 2010 Mar 8. — View Citation

Coffey EBJ, Mogilever NB, Zatorre RJ. Speech-in-noise perception in musicians: A review. Hear Res. 2017 Sep;352:49-69. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 14. — View Citation

Fitzgerald MB, Wright BA. Perceptual learning and generalization resulting from training on an auditory amplitude-modulation detection task. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Feb;129(2):898-906. doi: 10.1121/1.3531841. — View Citation

Fritz J, Elhilali M, Shamma S. Active listening: task-dependent plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex. Hear Res. 2005 Aug;206(1-2):159-76. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.01.015. — View Citation

Fu QJ, Galvin JJ 3rd, Wang X, Wu JL. Benefits of music training in mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Feb;58(1):163-9. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-14-0127. — View Citation

Huyck JJ, Wright BA. Learning, worsening, and generalization in response to auditory perceptual training during adolescence. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1172-82. doi: 10.1121/1.4812258. — View Citation

Looi V, Gfeller K, Driscoll V. MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW. Semin Hear. 2012 Nov 1;33(4):307-334. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329222. Epub 2012 Nov 19. — View Citation

Parbery-Clark A, Skoe E, Kraus N. Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound. J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 11;29(45):14100-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3256-09.2009. — View Citation

Patel AD. Why would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis. Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 29;2:142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142. eCollection 2011. — View Citation

Polley DB, Steinberg EE, Merzenich MM. Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences. J Neurosci. 2006 May 3;26(18):4970-82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3771-05.2006. — View Citation

Ruggles DR, Freyman RL, Oxenham AJ. Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086980. eCollection 2014. — View Citation

Sabin AT, Eddins DA, Wright BA. Perceptual learning evidence for tuning to spectrotemporal modulation in the human auditory system. J Neurosci. 2012 May 9;32(19):6542-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5732-11.2012. — View Citation

Szpiro SF, Wright BA, Carrasco M. Learning one task by interleaving practice with another task. Vision Res. 2014 Aug;101:118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 21. — View Citation

Wright BA, Sabin AT, Zhang Y, Marrone N, Fitzgerald MB. Enhancing perceptual learning by combining practice with periods of additional sensory stimulation. J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 22;30(38):12868-77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0487-10.2010. — View Citation

Yucel E, Sennaroglu G, Belgin E. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;73(7):1043-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 May 2. — View Citation

* Note: There are 18 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	speech recognition after training	Subjects will be measured for their baseline speech recognition performance (A) and then measured again for speech recognition after receiving auditory training using the psychophysical methods (B). Finally, the subjects will be measured for speech recognition the third time after the training is withdrawn following a ABA longitudinal design.	starting 12 months after the award and will take up to 3.5 years to complete