View clinical trials related to Cytomegalovirus Infections.
Filter by:Patients with moderate or severe CMV disease less than 21 days old who have a maternal donor who has a CMV response to the peptivators will be screened. All patients will receive treatment with valganciclovir or ganciclovir. There is a safety run in with treatment with CMV CTLs in cohort 1 and if found to be safe, will proceed to cohort 2 for randomization to receive antiviral therapy with or without CMV CTLs. Funding source: FDA OOPD
Liver transplantation is the only curative treatment of end-stage liver disease, and every year, around 60 patients undergo liver transplantation in Denmark. Immunosuppressive therapy is necessary to avoid rejection of the transplanted organ. Over 90% of adults have been infected with at least one herpesvirus, and it is characteristic for herpesviruses that after a first-time infection, the virus remains dormant in the body and may reactivate, particularly if the host is immunosuppressed. An effective immune response against reactivation depends highly on T cells, but T cells are suppressed by immunosuppressive drugs given to organ transplant recipients. Infections caused by herpesviruses are therefore very common in organ transplant recipients, and particularly two herpesviruses, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) pose challenges after transplantation. CMV causes significant morbidity in transplant recipients, contributes to increased mortality and may contribute to loss of the transplanted organ. CMV infections occur in around 40% of liver transplant recipients within a year of transplantation. VZV causes chickenpox at first-time infection and shingles at reactivation. VZV is the second-most common infection in transplant recipients and occurs in around 9% of liver transplant recipients each year. Organ transplant recipients are at higher risk for disseminated disease with complications compared to immunocompetent persons. A limited number of drugs exist that reduce the risk of and treat CMV infection, but they may cause significant adverse events, and drug resistance is emerging. To avoid CMV infection, some liver transplant recipients receive prophylactic therapy, but due to toxicity, new treatment modalities are warranted. This requires knowledge about herpesvirus specific T cell function in liver transplant recipients, which currently is limited. The aim of this study is to provide an in-depth description of the protective immune response and immunological risk factors for CMV and VZV infections in liver transplant recipients and to identify patients at high risk in order to provide a platform for future treatment modalities against CMV and VZV infections in liver transplant recipients.
The investigators' hypothesis is that maternal treatment with Letermovir will inhibit fetal CMV replication better than Valaciclovir in infected fetuses and lead to a higher proportion of negative CMV PCR at birth in cord blood. The main objective is to demonstrate that Letermovir administered to women carrying a CMV infected fetus following a maternal infection of the first trimester increases the proportion of neonates with a negative CMV PCR in neonatal blood collected in the first day of life or in cord blood in case of termination of pregnancy (TOP) compared to Valaciclovir. In each group , the proportion of asymptomatic neonates and the number and type of long-term sequelae at 2 years will also be assessed and compared.
Many risk factors are known to be associated with high risk of developing CMV infection in positive CMV-serostatus patients: negative CMV-serostatus donor, unrelated or mismatched donor, use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and development of GVHD. Acute GVHD occurs during the first hundred days after transplantation. In spite of systematic GVHD prophylactic using immunosuppressive agents, approximately 50% of transplantation recipients develop GVHD. The first-line treatment of acute GVHD is methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day. Probably because of the use corticosteroids but also due to the GVHD itself, approximately 46% of CMV seropositive patients develop CMV infection (report from the national database of the SFGM-TC, data unpublished yet). CMV infection leads to longer duration of hospitalization and increases the risk of mortality, particularly in cases of CMV disease. Available antiviral agents used to prevent CMV infections are generally reputed to cause significant side effects. These agents can prevent full immunological post-transplant reconstitution and cause profound cytopenia. Some agents may be responsible for renal impairment, which prevents continuation of immunosuppressive treatment; this is especially the case with calcineurin inhibitors in allo-HCT patients. Indeed, compared to placebo, intravenous ganciclovir has been shown to reduce the risk of CMV infection and disease, although it did not appear to improve overall survival. However, it was responsible for 30% of cases of severe neutropenia in allo-HCT patients, increasing the risk of bacterial and fungal coinfections. CMV infection treatment is commonly based on ganciclovir and foscavir and, to a lesser extent, on other drugs, including cidofovir. However, these drugs cause high levels of toxicity, resulting in myelotoxicity in the case of ganciclovir, or, in the case of foscavir and cidofovir, potential renal failure, incurring treatment discontinuation. CMV prophylaxis using drugs with fewer side-effects is necessary in patients at high risk of CMV infection. With its safety profile, Cytotect®CP offers an alternative option for CMV prophylaxis with avoidance of renal and bone marrow impairment. Considering the high risk of developing CMV infection, we decided to investigate the efficacy and safety of Cytotect®CP in patients requiring systematic corticosteroids (≥ 1 mg/kg/day) for an initial episode of grade II-IV acute GVHD following a first allo-HCT.
The main aim of this study is to find out the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of maribavir for the treatment of CMV infection in children and teenagers after HSCT or SOT and to identify the optimal dose of maribavir using a 200 milligrams (mg) adult tablet formulation or other formulation based on PK modeling. The participants will be treated with maribavir for 8 weeks. Participants need to visit their doctor during 12-week follow-up period.
Multicentre, observational, retrospective study to analyze the differences in CMVi pattern and recurrences between two groups of allogeneic HSCT patients (haplo vs no haplo HSCT), with intervention both postransplant cyclophosphamide as GvHD prophylaxis, using a database with information from historical clinic data.
This is a Phase 3 study to evaluate posoleucel (ALVR105, Viralym-M); an allogeneic, off-the-shelf multi-virus specific T cell therapy that targets six viral pathogens: BK virus, cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus 6 and JC virus.
ReCySOT study is a multicenter, retrospective, observational case-control study on risk factors for developing a ganciclovir-resistant (GCV-R) cytomegalovirus infection in patients receiving solid organ transplant. Aims of the study are to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for GCV-R CMV infection in SOT recipients in order to design further studies aimed at preventing and improving the patient management of GCV-R CMV infections.
The management of patients with a history of congenital CMV infection (whether symptomatic or asymptomatic at birth) is modeled on their usual management.
The primary objective is to determine the safety and feasibility of administering R-MVST cells to patients with refractory viral reactivation and/or symptomatic disease caused by Epstein Barr Virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), adenovirus (ADV) or BK virus. R-MVST cells will be generated on-demand from the closest partially human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched (minimum haploidentical) healthy donors or from the original allo-transplant donor if available. The investigator will closely monitor the recipients for potential toxicities including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) post-infusion. Secondary objectives are to determine the effect of R-MVST infusion on viral load, possible recovery of antiviral immunity post-infusion and for evidence of clinical responses and overall survival. Recipients will be monitored for secondary graft failure at day 28 post R-MVST infusion.