Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01978938
Other study ID # TP-434-010
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date October 6, 2014
Est. completion date August 21, 2015

Study information

Verified date December 2021
Source La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of eravacycline compared with levofloxacin in participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).


Description:

This study began with a 3-arm Lead-in portion to determine the oral (PO) dosing (200 or 250 milligrams [mg]) of eravacycline to be used with intravenously (IV) administered eravacycline for the Pivotal portion (2 arms). A PO dose of 200 mg was selected based on the unblinded Lead-in analysis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 908
Est. completion date August 21, 2015
Est. primary completion date June 3, 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male and female participants with either: a. Pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy (approximately 50% of the total population), OR b. cUTI with at least 1 of the following conditions associated with a risk for developing cUTI: i. Indwelling urinary catheter ii. Urinary retention (approximately 100 milliliters of residual urine after voiding) iii. Neurogenic bladder iv. Partial obstructive uropathy (such as, nephrolithiasis, bladder stones, and ureteral strictures) v. Azotemia of renal origin (not congestive heart failure or volume related) such that the serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) is elevated (>20 mg/deciliters) AND the serum BUN: creatinine ratio is <15 vi. Surgically modified or abnormal urinary tract anatomy (such as, bladder diverticula, redundant urine collection system) EXCEPT surgery within the last month Exclusion Criteria: 1. Concurrent use of non-study antibacterial drug therapy that would have a potential effect on outcome evaluations in participants with cUTI, including: 1. Participants with a history of a levofloxacin-resistant urinary tract infection 2. Likely to receive ongoing antibacterial drug prophylaxis prior to the late Post-Treatment visit (such as, participants with vesiculo-ureteral reflux)

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Eravacycline

Levofloxacin


Locations

Country Name City State
Bulgaria Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Dr. Tota Venkova", Gabrovo, Department of Nephrology Gabrovo
Bulgaria Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Dr. Stamen Iliev", Montana, Department of Nephrology and Dialysis Montana
Bulgaria University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Dr. Georgi Stranski", Pleven, Urology Clinic Pleven
Bulgaria Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, Ruse, Department of Urology Rousse
Bulgaria Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, Sofia at Military Medical Academy, General Urology Clinic Sofia
Bulgaria University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Aleksandrovska", Sofia, Department of Laparoscopic Urology Sofia
Bulgaria University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment and Emergency Medicine "N.I. Pirogov", Sofia, Urology Clinic Sofia
Bulgaria Multiprofile Regional Hospital for Active Treatment "Dr. Stefan Cherkezov", Veliko Tarnovo, Department of Urology Veliko Tarnovo
Colombia Fundacion Cardiomet Armenia
Colombia De la Costa Clinic. Ltd. Research Centre Barranquilla
Czechia University Hospital Brno, Clinic of Urology Brno
Czechia University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Clinic of Urology Hradec Kralove
Czechia Hospital Novy Jicin, Department of Urology Novy Jicin
Czechia University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc
Czechia Thomayer Hospital, Department of Urology Prague
Estonia East Viru Central Hospital, Surgery Clinic Kohtla-Jarve
Estonia East Tallinn Central Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine Tallinn
Estonia West Tallinn Central Hospital, Department of Urology Tallinn
Estonia Tartu University Hospital, Surgery Clinic, Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation Tartu
Georgia Western Georgia National Medical Center Kutaisi
Georgia Aversi Clinic Tbilisi
Georgia Modern Medical Technologies - Guram Karazanashvili's clinic Tbilisi
Georgia Research Institute of Clinical Medicine Tbilisi
Georgia Tsulukidze National Center of Urology Tbilisi
Greece Evaggelismos Hospital Kolonaki
Greece Papageorgiou General Hospital Thessaloníki
Hungary Principal SMO Kft. Baja
Hungary Jahn Ferenc South Pest Hospital, Department of Urology Budapest
Hungary Petz Aladar County Teaching Hospital, Department of Urology Gyor
Hungary Elisabeth Teaching Hospital and Rehabilitation Institute of Sopron, Department of Urology Sopron
Hungary Csongrad County Dr. Bugyi Istvan Hospital, Department of Urology Szentes
Hungary St. Borbala Hospital, Department of Urology Tatabanya
Israel Zion Medical Center Haifa
Italy Hospital Mater Domini Castellanza
Latvia Liepajas Regional Hospital Liepaja
Latvia P. Stradins Clinical University Hospital Riga
Latvia Riga East University Hospital, LLC Riga
Latvia SIA 'URO' Clinic Riga
Latvia Vidzemes Hospital Valmiera
Mexico Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde Guadalajara
Mexico Hospital Civil Guadalajara Dr. Juan I. Mendoza Guadalajara
Moldova, Republic of National Scientific Practical Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Urology Chisinau
Moldova, Republic of Republican Clinical Hospital, Department of Urology Chisinau
Poland Boni Fratres Catoviensis Sp. z o.o., Department of Internal Diseases with Cardiologic Diagnostics Unit Katowice
Poland Military Medical Academy University Teaching Hospital - Central Veterans' Hospital, Clinical and Didactic Center of the Medical University of Lodz, Teaching Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Renal Transplantation Lodz
Poland Medicome Sp. z o.o. Oswiecim
Poland HEUREKA Hanna Szalecka Piaseczno
Poland Pope John Paul 2nd Independent Public Provincial Hospital Zamosc
Romania Emergency Clinical County Hospital Brasov Brasov
Romania "Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele" Clinical Hospital Bucharest
Romania Delta Hospital Bucharest
Romania Craiova Emergency Clinical County Hospital Craiova
Romania Clinical Hospital "Dr. C. I. Parhon" Ia?i
Romania Oradea Clinical Municipal Hospital "Dr. Gavril Curteanu" Oradea
Romania Sibiu County Emergency Clinical Hospital Sibiu
Russian Federation Central Clinical Hospital of Civil Aviation Moscow
Russian Federation City Clinical Hospital #57 under Moscow Healthcare Department Moscow
Russian Federation Federal Clinical Center for High Medical Technologies Moscow
Russian Federation City Clinical Hospital of Emergency Care #2 Novosibirsk
Russian Federation Penza Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko Penza
Russian Federation Rostov State Medical University Rostov-on-Don
Russian Federation North-Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Saint-Petersburg Scientific Research Institute for Phthisiopulmonology Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital under the Russian Academy of Sciences Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation St. Petersburg State Healthcare Institution: City Hospital #15 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation St. Petersburg State Healthcare Institution: St. George the Martyr City Hospital Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation St. Petersburg State-Funded Healthcare Institution: City Hospital #26 Saint Petersburg
Russian Federation Saratov State Medical University n.a. V.I. Razumovsky Saratov
Russian Federation Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital Smolensk
Russian Federation Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital Veliky Novgorod
Russian Federation Vsevolozhsk Clinical Central District Hospital Vsevolozhsk
South Africa Lakeview Hospital Benoni
South Africa Clinresco Centres Kempton Park
South Africa Mzansi Ethical Research Centre Middleburg
South Africa St. Georges Hospital Port Elizabeth
Ukraine Regional Municipal Institution "Chernivtsi Regional Hospital" Chernivtsi
Ukraine Dnipropetrovsk City Multispecialty Clinical Hospital #4 Dnipropetrovsk
Ukraine Dnipropetrovsk I.I. Mechnikov Regional Clinical Hospital Dnipropetrovsk
Ukraine Ivano-Frankivsk City Clinical Hospital #1 Ivano-Frankivs'k
Ukraine Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Clinical Hospital Ivano-Frankivs'k
Ukraine O.I. Meschaninov Clinical Hospital of Emergency and Urgent Medical Care Kharkiv
Ukraine Shapoval Regional Clinical Center of Urology and Nephrology Kharkiv
Ukraine Khmelnytskyi Regional Hospital Khmel'nyts'kyy
Ukraine Institute of Urology Kyiv
Ukraine Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital L'viv
Ukraine Volyn Regional Clinical Hospital Luts'k
Ukraine Mykolaiv Regional Hospital, Center for Nephrology and Dialysis Mykolaiv
Ukraine City Clinical Hospital #10, Urology Department #1 Odesa
Ukraine Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital Odessa
Ukraine Poltava M.V. Sklifosovskyi Regional Clinical Hospital Poltava
Ukraine State Institution: Uzhhorod Railway Station Clinical Hospital under State Territorial Industry-Specific Association:Lviv Railway Uzhhorod
Ukraine Vinnytsia M.I. Pyrohov Regional Clinical Hospital Vinnytsya
Ukraine Municipal Institution "Zaporizhzhia Reqional Clinical Hospital" of Zaporizhzhia Regional Councill Zaporizhzhya
United States Columbus Regional Research Institute Columbus Ohio
United States Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan
United States Sunrise Hospital and Medical Centre Las Vegas Nevada
United States San Diego Clinical Trials San Diego California
United States Tampa General Hospital Tampa Florida
United States Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Bulgaria,  Colombia,  Czechia,  Estonia,  Georgia,  Greece,  Hungary,  Israel,  Italy,  Latvia,  Mexico,  Moldova, Republic of,  Poland,  Romania,  Russian Federation,  South Africa,  Ukraine, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Participants In The Microbiological Intent-To-Treat (Micro-ITT) Population With A Responder Outcome At The Post-Treatment (PT) Visit This was the primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to levofloxacin in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of Responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate. PT Visit
Secondary Participants In The Microbiological Modified ITT (Micro-MITT) Population With A Microbiological Response This outcome measure (FDA and the European Medicines Agency [EMA]) compared the microbiological responses of eravacycline to levofloxacin for both treatment groups in the micro-MITT population. Responses were success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Success was considered a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 CFU/mL. Failure required blood cultures at or beyond end of therapy (EOT) to be positive for baseline pathogen(s), or urine culture to grow =10^4 CFU/mL of the baseline pathogen(s). Indeterminate/missing indicated no interpretable culture data available. PT Visit
Secondary Participants In The Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population With A Microbiological Response This outcome measure (FDA and EMA) compared the microbiological responses of eravacycline to levofloxacin for both treatment groups in the ME population. Responses were either success or failure. Indeterminate/missing responses were not included. Success was considered a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 CFU/mL. Failure required blood cultures at or beyond EOT to be positive for baseline pathogen(s), or urine culture to grow =10^4 CFU/mL of the baseline pathogen(s). Indeterminate/missing indicated no interpretable culture data available. Populations: ME, all micro-ITT and clinically-evaluable (CE) participants with a suitable urine specimen and an interpretable urine culture; micro-ITT, all participants with =1 baseline bacterial pathogen from a urine or blood culture that caused a UTI against which eravacycline had expected antibacterial activity; ITT, all randomized participants, regardless of receiving study drug or not. PT Visit