Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma Clinical Trial
— CTCLOfficial title:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-arm Phase 2 Trial to Assess Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of CD11301 0.03% and 0.06% Gel in the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL), Stages IA, IB and IIA
Verified date | March 2021 |
Source | Galderma R&D |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics in participants treated with CD11301 gel vs. placebo for early stage CTCL (IA, IB, or IIA).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 86 |
Est. completion date | March 17, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | March 17, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Clinical Diagnosis of CTCL stage IA, IB, or IIA with biopsy within last 3 months - Have BSA involvement corresponding to stages IA, IB or IIA CTCL with at least 3 distinct lesions Exclusion Criteria: - CTCL that is stage IIB or great or stage IIA with stage N2 with >5% circulating Sezary cells or CD8+ or large cell transformation or Progressive CTCL - History of autoimmune disease - Laboratory test values at screening outside of the normal range and judged clinically significant by the investigator - Current participation in another clinical trial of a drug or device or past participation within 4 weeks before Baseline or participant is in exclusion period from a previous clinical trial |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Nantes | Pays De La Loire |
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Paris | Île-de-France |
France | Galderma Investigational Site | Pierre-Bénite | Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Kiel | Schleswig-Holstein |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Krefeld | North Rhine-Westphalia |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Mannheim | Baden-Württemberg |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Minden | North Rhine-Westphalia |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Münster | North Rhine-Westphalia |
Germany | Galderma Investigational Site | Wurzburg | Bavaria |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Farmington | Connecticut |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Orange | California |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Palo Alto | California |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Galderma Investigational Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Galderma R&D |
United States, France, Germany,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants Reported Overall Response (Complete and Partial) of Target Treated Lesions Based on Modified Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Severity (mCAILS) Score at Week 12 | Overall response is defined as the number of participants that achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by mCAILS. The mCAILS assessment total was derived from components collected on the case report form (CRF). Target treated lesions (1-5 lesions) were rated in erythema (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), scaling (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), plaque elevation (0-3, where 0=no evidence and 3= marked elevation), and size (scale=0-18, where 0= no measurable area and 18= size of lesion >300 centimeter [cm]^2). These 4 ratings were summed to create subtotals, 1 per lesion. The final mCAILS assessment score was the sum of these subtotals. Total summation Score: 0-50 where higher score indicated higher severity. Complete response is defined as a 100% decrease from baseline i.e. score of '0' on the mCAILS scale. Partial response is defined as at least a 50%, but less than 100%, decrease from baseline. | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Number of Participants Reported Overall Response (OR) of Target Treated Lesions Based on Modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) Score at Week 12 | OR is defined as the number of participants that achieved a complete response or partial response as assessed by mSWAT. mSWAT composite score involved the direct assessment of the BSA of each type of lesion (palm plus fingers of the participant= approximately 1% BSA) in each of 12 areas (Head, Neck, Anterior trunk, Arms, Forearms, Hands, Posterior trunk, Buttocks, Thighs, Legs, Feet, Groin) of the body, multiplying the sum of the BSA of each lesion type by a weighting factor (patch = 1, plaque = 2, and tumor = 3 or 4) and generating a sum of the subtotals of each lesion subtype. mSWAT score (0=no lesions; 400= lesions covering all areas). Complete response is defined as a 100% decrease from baseline. Partial response is defined as at least a 50%, but less than 100%, decrease from baseline, and with a tumor subscore of zero (no tumor). | Week 12 | |
Secondary | Time to Participant's First Overall Response (Complete or Partial) of the Target Treated Lesions Based on the mCAILS Score | Time to overall response (CR or PR) is the number of days from the start of drug application to the first documentation of objective response assessed by mCAILS Score. The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were presented along with 95% confidence intervals using the log-log transformation. The mCAILS assessment total was derived from components collected on the case report form (CRF). Target treated lesions (1-5 lesions) were rated in erythema (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), scaling (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), plaque elevation (0-3, where 0=no evidence and 3= marked elevation), and size (scale=0-18, where 0= no measurable area and 18= size of lesion >300 centimeter [cm]^2). These 4 ratings were summed to create subtotals, 1 per lesion. The final mCAILS assessment score was the sum of these subtotals. Total summation Score: 0-50 where higher score indicated higher severity. | Up to Week 36 | |
Secondary | Duration of Overall Response (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on mCAILS Score | The duration of overall response (complete or partial) of the target treated lesions based on the mCAILS score was calculated in days as: (date of first non-response after responding) - (date of response) + 1. The mCAILS assessment total was derived from components collected on the case report form (CRF). Target treated lesions (1-5 lesions) were rated in erythema (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), scaling (0-8, where 0=no evidence and 8= very severe), plaque elevation (0-3, where 0=no evidence and 3= marked elevation), and size (scale=0-18, where 0= no measurable area and 18= size of lesion >300 centimeter [cm]^2). These 4 ratings were summed to create subtotals, 1 per lesion. The final mCAILS assessment score was the sum of these subtotals. Total summation Score: 0-50 where higher score indicated higher severity. | Up to Week 36 | |
Secondary | Time to Progressive Disease Using mSWAT | Progressive disease is defined as = 25% increase in skin disease from baseline, or loss of response: in those with CR or PR, increase of skin score of greater than the sum of nadir plus 50% baseline score, Nadir is defined as the lowest skin score (best response). | Up to Week 36 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Skindex-29 Survey Results at Week 12, 24 and 36 | Participants answered 30 questions as part of the Skindex-29 survey. A composite score and 3 sub scores were calculated from the results. Item 18 of the survey was not used in any scoring. First, answers to each item were given a numeric value: Never = 0; Rarely = 25; Sometimes = 50; Often = 75; All the time = 100. The items used to calculate each subscore were: Emotions: 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 15, 21, 23, 26, and 28 (10 items), Symptoms: 1, 7, 10, 16, 19, 24, and 27 (7 items), Functioning: 2, 4, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 22, 25, 29, and 30 (12 items). The composite score is the average of the 3 sub scores ranging from 0 (no effect)-100 (maximum effect), higher score corresponds to lower quality of life. | Week 12, 24 and Follow up (Week 36) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02546440 -
Study on Therapy With Dimethylfumarate (DMF) in Patients With Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04014374 -
Post-authorization Safety Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Treated With Mogamulizumab
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03340155 -
Mechanisms of Action of Photo(Chemo)Therapy in Skin Diseases
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01460914 -
Outcomes of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma and Graft-Versus-Host Disease With Extracorporeal Photopheresis Treatment
|
||
Completed |
NCT04955340 -
A Phase 1, Open-label Study of the Absorption, Metabolism, Excretion of [14C]-Resminostat
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02539472 -
Early Diagnosis of Mycosis Fungoides
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06436677 -
A Study of Molecular Subtyping-based Therapeutic Strategies for Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05680558 -
Photopheresis in Early-stage Mycosis Fungoides
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01132989 -
Open-label Pilot Study of Lenalidomide (Revlimid) as Adjuvant Treatment for Refractory Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05414500 -
Mogamulizumab and Brentuximab Vedotin in CTCL and Mycosis Fungoides
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01663571 -
STAT3 in T Cells: At The Crossroads of Inflammation and Cancer
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02192021 -
Micro Needle Array-Doxorubicin (MNA-D) in Patients With Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05781386 -
A Phase I Trial of SIM1811-03 in Subjects With Advanced Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02576496 -
Study of Tinostamustine, First-in-Class Alkylating HDACi Fusion Molecule, in Relapsed/Refractory Hematologic Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03775525 -
Study Evaluating GZ17-6.02 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or in Combination With Capecitabine in Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03235869 -
Radiation Therapy Plus Durvalumab for Tumor-Stage Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01396070 -
Pilot Study of Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) in Patients With MF With Variable CD30 Expression Level
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01198665 -
RAD001 Combined With CHOP in Newly Diagnosed Peripheral T-cell Lymphomas
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03932279 -
Characterization of the Microbiome in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05728879 -
Characterization of the Microbiome in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma Skin Lesions Before and After Use of APR-TD011® (RLF-TD011®) Spray Solution
|
Early Phase 1 |