Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase II Study of Oral LBH589 in Adult Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Are Intolerant to or Have Progressed on or After Prior HDAC Inhibitor
Verified date | August 2021 |
Source | Novartis |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of LBH589B in adult participants with refractory/resistant Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma and prior Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor therapy.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 9 |
Est. completion date | September 22, 2009 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2009 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion criteria: 1. Written informed consent obtained prior to any screening procedures 2. Age greater than or equal to 18 years old 3. Participants with biopsy-confirmed stages IB-IVA mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome (SS). Participants with SS who have bone marrow involvement are also eligible. Participants with transformed CTCL are eligible 4. Participants must have been treated with an HDAC inhibitor given for the treatment of CTCL. Participants must have had disease progression on or following treatment with an HDAC inhibitor. Participants are also eligible if they had an inadequate response to an HDAC inhibitor defined as stable disease as the best response after at least 3 months of therapy. Participants previously treated with an HDAC inhibitor are also eligible if they experienced intolerance due to adverse events. 5. Baseline multiple-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram must have demonstrated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = the lower limit of the institutional normal 6. ECOG performance status = 2 Exclusion criteria: 1. Participants with a history of visceral disease including central nervous system (CNS) involvement (i.e. stage IVB CTCL). Note, participants who have SS with bone marrow involvement are eligible 2. Impaired cardiac function 3. Concomitant use of drugs with a risk of causing torsades de pointes 4. Participants who have received chemotherapy or any investigational drug or undergone major surgery = 3 weeks prior to starting study drug or who have not recovered from side effects of such therapy 5. Less than 3 months since prior electron beam therapy 6. Women who are pregnant or breast feeding, or women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) not willing to use a double method of contraception during the study and 3 months after the end of treatment. Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Medical College of Georgia | Augusta | Georgia |
United States | University of Colorado Health Sciences Center/Anschutz Cancer Pavillion | Aurora | Colorado |
United States | University of Alabama at Birmingham/ The Kirklin Clinic | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center/Comprehensive Cancer Center | Bronx | New York |
United States | Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York |
United States | Rush Presbyterian Hospital/St. Luke's Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | The Jones Clinic | Germantown | Tennessee |
United States | MD Anderson Cancer Center/University of Texas | Houston | Texas |
United States | UCLA Medical Center School of Medicine/ Dpt of Hematology-Oncology | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Florida Academic Dermatology Centers | Miami | Florida |
United States | NYU Clinical Cancer Center | New York | New York |
United States | Nebraska Medical Center | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | University of Pittsburg Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Craig Okada | Portland | Oregon |
United States | St. Louis University Cancer Cennter | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Seattle Cancer Care Alliance | Seattle | Washington |
United States | University of Oklahoma-Tulsa | Tulsa | Oklahoma |
United States | Wake University Health Sciences | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With Resistant Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Treated With Oral Panobinostat by Using the Modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response (OR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on mSWAT score, (OR = CR + PR). mSWAT score represents the product of the percentage total body surface area (%TBSA) involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor: modified SWAT score = (patch %TBSA x 1) + (plaque %TBSA x 2) + (tumor or ulcer %TBSA x 4). The sum of these 3 numbers gave the modified SWAT score, on a 0 (no lesions) to 400 (lesions covering all areas) scale. CR based on mSWAT score was defined as the absence of skin disease. PR was defined as = 50% decrease of the modified SWAT score compared to the Baseline score. | From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years) | |
Secondary | Response Rate of Participants With Refractory CTCL Using the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) | Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR based on PGA scale. PGA is a 7-point grading scale for the investigator's assessment of the overall extent of improvement or worsening of the participant's disease as compared to Baseline. CR corresponds to Grade 0 (Completely clear) on PGA scale and was defined as no evidence of disease; 100% improvement. PR corresponds to Grade 2 (marked improvement) on PGA scale and was defined as significant improvement (=75% - <90%); some evidence of disease remains. | From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years) | |
Secondary | Response Rate in Participants With Refractory CTCL Using Modified Skin Score | Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR based on mSWAT skin score. mSWAT score represents the product of the %TBSA involvement of each lesion type (patch, plaque, and tumor or ulceration), multiplied by a weighting factor: mSWAT score = (patch %TBSA x 1) + (plaque %TBSA x 2) + (tumor or ulcer %TBSA x 4). The sum of these 3 numbers gave the modified SWAT score, on a 0 (no lesions) to 400 (lesions covering all areas) scale. CR based on mSWAT score was defined as the absence of skin disease. PR was defined as = 50% decrease of the modified SWAT score compared to the Baseline score. | From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years) | |
Secondary | Responses in Index Lesions in Participants With Refractory CTCL by Lesion Measurements With Photographic Supporting Documentation | Index lesions in each participant were selected as four to six of the prominent lesions amenable to bi-dimensional measurements. The longest diameter and its perpendicular measurement were used to determine the surface area and a weighted sum was determined as: Lesion 1 + lesion 2 + … + lesions 6 = Total sum of weighted score where Lesion 1: cm^2 x [1 (for patch); 2 (for plaque); 4 (for tumor or ulcer)]; Lesion 2: cm^2 x [1 (for patch); 2 (for plaque); 4 (for tumor or ulcer)]; Lesion 6: cm^2 x [1 (for patch); 2 (for plaque); 4 (for tumor or ulcer)]. These lesions were photographed at Baseline and at the time of response determined by either mSWAT or PGA | From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death (up to approximately 2 years) | |
Secondary | ORR of Participants With Resistant CTCL Treated With Oral Panobinostat by Using the Modified PGA to Assess Skin Disease and the Evaluation of Disease in the Viscera, Lymph Nodes and Blood (Circulating Sézary Syndrome Cells) | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best OR of CR or PR based on PGA scale (OR = CR + PR). The PGA is a 7-point grading scale for the investigator's assessment of the overall extent of improvement or worsening of the participant's disease as compared to Baseline. CR corresponds to Grade 0 (completely clear) of PGA scale and was defined as no evidence of disease; 100% improvement. PR corresponds to Grade 2 (marked improvement) of PGA scale and was defined as significant improvement (=75%-<90%); some evidence of disease remains. | From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years) | |
Secondary | Duration of Response (DOR) | DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until the earliest date of documented progression or death due to any cause among participants who achieved a confirmed CR or PR. The DOR was calculated in two ways. The DOR among responders only included participants who responded to the drug. The overall DOR included non-responders as having a DOR of zero days. | From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years) | |
Secondary | Time to Response (TTR) | TTR was defined as the time from the start of treatment until the first documented evidence of CR or PR among participants who achieved a confirmed CR or PR. | From first dose of study drug up to study completion (approximately 2 years) | |
Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS was defined as the time from the start of treatment until the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. | From first dose of study drug up to disease progression or death, (up to approximately 2 years) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00341939 -
Retrospective Analysis of a Drug-Metabolizing Genotype in Cancer Patients and Correlation With Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamics Data
|
||
Completed |
NCT00038025 -
A Study Of Deoxycoformycin(DCF)/Pentostatin In Lymphoid Malignancies
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02881749 -
Low Dose Total Skin Electron Beam Treatment (TSEBT) Followed by Maintenance Valchlor for Patients With Mycosis Fungoides
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00744991 -
A Study for Participants With Relapsed Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00099593 -
Immunization Against Tumor Cells in Sezary Syndrome
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02593045 -
Study of IPH4102 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphomas (CTCL)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00779896 -
Tazarotene 0.1% Cream For the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: A Prospective Study
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00177268 -
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
|
||
Completed |
NCT01728805 -
Study of KW-0761 Versus Vorinostat in Relapsed/Refractory CTCL
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00969085 -
Trial of Curcumin in Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00412997 -
LBH589 in Adult Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00254332 -
Effect of Denileukin Diftitox on Immune System in CTCL Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04296786 -
Sintilimab Plus Chidamide in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma: a Multicenter Phase II Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06285370 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KW-0761 in Chinese Subjects With Mycosis Fungoides or Sézary Syndrome Previously Treated With Systemic Therapy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00071084 -
Clinical Trial of HuMax-CD4, a New Drug to Treat Advanced Stage T-Cell Lymphoma in the Skin.
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00896493 -
Ph II of Non-myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation Using TLI & ATG In Patients w/ Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00699296 -
Study of Oral LBH589 in Patients With Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma and Adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02676778 -
Study of E7777 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma and Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02061449 -
Poly ICLC, Radiation, and Romidepsin for Advanced Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01134341 -
Pralatrexate and Bexarotene in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
|
Phase 1 |