Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Clinical Trial
— LAVENDEROfficial title:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Adults With Chronic and/or Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Who Are Refractory and/or Intolerant to Antimalarial Therapy
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) anifrolumab versus placebo in adult participants with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 460 |
Est. completion date | January 27, 2028 |
Est. primary completion date | January 27, 2028 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility | Key inclusion criteria: - Participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of CLE. Diagnosis must be clinically and histologically confirmed with the following: - CLASI-A total score = 10 points at Screening and confirmed at randomization. - CLA-IGA-R erythema score of = 3 and CLA-IGA-R-OMC score of = 1 at Screening and confirmed at randomization. - Inadequate response or intolerant to antimalarial therapy. - Participants should have no medical history or signs or symptoms of active or prior tuberculosis infection (TB) and the same should reflect in chest radiograph or a chest CT scan result. - Contraceptive use by males and females should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies. - Participants should have a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) negative PCR or antigen test result as per local policies at Screening. Key exclusion criteria: - History or evidence of suicidal ideation. - Severe or life-threatening Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). - Active SLE or Sjögren's Syndrome. - Any active skin conditions other than CLE that may interfere with the study. - History of recurrent infection requiring hospitalization and IV antibiotics. - COVID-19 infection - Any history of an anaphylactic reaction to human proteins, or monoclonal antibodies. - At screening, if participants do not meet the eligibility criteria assessed based on laboratory test results e.g tests for total bilirubin, serum creatinine etc. NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Argentina | Research Site | Ciudad de Buenos Aires | |
Argentina | Research Site | Córdoba | |
Argentina | Research Site | Quilmes | |
Australia | Research Site | Box Hill | |
Australia | Research Site | Clayton | |
Australia | Research Site | Melbourne | |
Australia | Research Site | Westmead | |
Australia | Research Site | Woolloongabba | |
Austria | Research Site | Graz | |
Austria | Research Site | Innsbruck | |
Austria | Research Site | Linz | |
Austria | Research Site | Sankt Pölten | |
Belgium | Research Site | Liège | |
Brazil | Research Site | Belo Horizonte | |
Brazil | Research Site | Porto Alegre | |
Brazil | Research Site | Salvador | |
Bulgaria | Research Site | Sofia | |
Chile | Research Site | Santiago | |
China | Research Site | Baotou | |
China | Research Site | Beijing | |
China | Research Site | Beijing | |
China | Research Site | Changchun | |
China | Research Site | Chengdu | |
China | Research Site | Chongqing | |
China | Research Site | Guangzhou | |
China | Research Site | Hangzhou | |
China | Research Site | Heilongjiang | |
China | Research Site | Jinan | |
China | Research Site | Kunming | |
China | Research Site | Nanchang | |
China | Research Site | Nanjing | |
China | Research Site | Shanghai | |
China | Research Site | Shanghai | |
China | Research Site | Shenzhen | |
China | Research Site | Shijiazhuang | |
China | Research Site | Wuhan | |
Colombia | Research Site | Barranquilla | |
Colombia | Research Site | Bogota | |
Colombia | Research Site | Chia | |
Denmark | Research Site | København | |
France | Research Site | Bois Guillaume | |
France | Research Site | Chambray Les Tours | |
France | Research Site | Lille Cedex | |
France | Research Site | Lyon Cedex 03 | |
France | Research Site | Nice | |
France | Research Site | Paris | |
France | Research Site | Paris | |
France | Research Site | Paris | |
France | Research Site | Paris | |
France | Research Site | Toulouse Cedex 9 | |
Germany | Research Site | Berlin | |
Germany | Research Site | Bochum | |
Germany | Research Site | Dresden | |
Germany | Research Site | Hannover | |
Germany | Research Site | Kiel | |
Germany | Research Site | Leipzig | |
Germany | Research Site | Mainz | |
Germany | Research Site | Regensburg | |
Germany | Research Site | Wuppertal | |
Greece | Research Site | Athens | |
Greece | Research Site | Athens | |
Greece | Research Site | Athens | |
Italy | Research Site | Brescia | |
Italy | Research Site | Florence | |
Italy | Research Site | Napoli | |
Italy | Research Site | Rome | |
Italy | Research Site | Torrette | |
Japan | Research Site | Fukuoka-Shi | |
Korea, Republic of | Research Site | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | Research Site | Seoul | |
Mexico | Research Site | Guadalajara | |
Mexico | Research Site | Guadalajara | |
Netherlands | Research Site | Rotterdam | |
Philippines | Research Site | Iloilo City | |
Philippines | Research Site | Lipa | |
Philippines | Research Site | Manila | |
Poland | Research Site | Katowice | |
Poland | Research Site | Olsztyn | |
Poland | Research Site | Poznan | |
Poland | Research Site | Warszawa | |
Poland | Research Site | Warszawa | |
Serbia | Research Site | Kragujevac | |
South Africa | Research Site | Cape Town | |
South Africa | Research Site | Johannesburg | |
Spain | Research Site | Barcelona | |
Spain | Research Site | Barcelona | |
Spain | Research Site | Madrid | |
Spain | Research Site | Madrid | |
Spain | Research Site | Madrid | |
Taiwan | Research Site | Kaohsiung | |
Taiwan | Research Site | Taichung | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Cambridge | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | Leeds | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | London | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | London | |
United Kingdom | Research Site | London | |
United States | Research Site | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Research Site | Brooklyn | New York |
United States | Research Site | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | Research Site | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Research Site | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Glendale | Arizona |
United States | Research Site | La Jolla | California |
United States | Research Site | Miami | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Miami | Florida |
United States | Research Site | New Haven | Connecticut |
United States | Research Site | Orange | California |
United States | Research Site | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Research Site | Plantation | Florida |
United States | Research Site | Portland | Oregon |
United States | Research Site | Rochester | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
AstraZeneca | Parexel |
United States, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Colombia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US, EU and ROW): Number of participants with adverse events | To evaluate the safety and tolerability of anifrolumab compared with placebo in participants with CLE. | Screening (up to and including 42 days before Day 1) until Safety Follow-up Period (13 weeks from Week 52/ EDV) | |
Primary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (United States [US]): Number of participants with Cutaneous Lupus Activity of Investigator's Global Assessment-Revised (CLA-IGA-R) erythema score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2- point reduction relative to baseline | The CLA-IGA-R is an assessment tool that scores the three key disease components (erythema; other morphological characteristics [OMC] and follicular activity) of CLE independently. The CLA-IGA-R erythema is scored on a five-point binary scale that provides a global clinical assessment ranging from 0 to 4 (0 indicates clear, 1 is almost clear, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate, and 4 indicates severe CLE). On all IGA scales, a decrease in score relates to an improvement in signs and symptoms. CLA-IGA-R erythema responder is defined as a participant who achieves a CLA-IGA-R erythema score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-point reduction relative to baseline. Otherwise, the participant is considered a non-responder. | At Week 24 | |
Primary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (European Union [EU]/Rest of the World [ROW]: Number of participants with a 70% reduction relative to baseline in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-Activity (CLASI-A) score | CLASI is a validated index used for assessing the cutaneous lesions of SLE. The CLASI instrument will be used at each study visit to capture individual skin manifestation scores. CLASI-70 responder (Yes/No) is defined as a participant who achieves a 70% reduction relative to baseline in CLASI-A score. Otherwise, the participant is considered a non-responder. | At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US): Number of participants who achieve a CLA-IGA-R OMC score of 0 or 1 and at least a 1-point reduction relative to baseline | The CLA-IGA-R is an assessment tool that scores the three key disease components (erythema; OMC and follicular activity) of CLE independently. The CLA-IGA-R OMC is scored on a five-point binary scale that provides a global clinical assessment ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates clear, 1 is almost clear, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate, and 4 indicates severe CLE. Assessment of CLA-IGA-R OMC score captures other morphological changes in CLE patients. A decrease in score relates to an improvement in signs and symptoms. A responder (yes/no) is defined as a participant who achieves a CLA-IGA-R OMC score of 0 or 1 and at least a 1-point reduction relative to baseline. Otherwise, the participant is considered a non-responder. | At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US): Number of participants who achieve a CLA-IGA-R OMC score of 0. | The CLA-IGA-R is an assessment tool that scores the three key disease components (erythema; OMC and follicular activity) of CLE independently. The CLA-IGA-R OMC is scored on a five-point binary scale that provides a global clinical assessment ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates clear, 1 is almost clear, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate, and 4 indicates severe CLE. CLA-IGA-R OMC complete response is defined as a participant who scores 0. Otherwise, the participant is a non-responder. Only participants with CLA-IGA-OMC = 3 at baseline will be included in the analysis. | At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US): Number of participants with CLA-IGA-R follicular activity score of 0 | The CLA-IGA-R is a tool that scores the three key disease components (erythema; OMC and follicular activity) of CLE independently.
CLA-IGA-R follicular activity provides a global clinical assessment on a 2-point binary scale ranging from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates absent and 1 indicates present. On all IGA scales, a decrease in score relates to an improvement in signs and symptoms. A responder (yes/no) is defined as a participant who achieves a CLA-IGA-R follicular activity score of 0. Otherwise, the participant is a non-responder. Only participants with follicular activity score of 1 at baseline will be included in the analysis. |
At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (EU/ROW): Percent change from baseline in total CLASI-A erythema score | The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index-Activity (CLASI-A) is a validated index used for assessing the cutaneous lesions of SLE. The CLASI-A erythema score is interpreted as follows: 0-absent; 1-pink; faint erythema; 2-red; 3-dark red; purple/violaceous/crusted/ hemorrhagic | At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (EU/ROW): Percent change from baseline in total CLASI-A scale/hypertrophy score | The CLASI-A is a validated index used for assessing the cutaneous lesions of SLE. CLASI-A Scale/Hypertrophy can be measured as 0, 1, and 2 where 0 is absent, 1 is scale, and 2 is verrucuos and hypertrohic. | At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US): Number of participants with CLA-IGA-R erythema score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-point reduction relative to baseline, or a CLA-IGA-R OMC score of 0 or 1 and at least a 1-point reduction relative to baseline | The CLA-IGA-R is a tool that scores the three key disease components (erythema; OMC and follicular activity) of CLE independently. The CLA-IGA-R erythema and OMC are scored on a five-point binary scale that provides a global clinical assessment ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates clear, 1 is almost clear, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate, and 4 indicates severe CLE. A responder (yes/no) is defined as a participant who achieves either a CLA-IGA-R erythema score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-point reduction relative to baseline, or a CLA-IGA-R OMC score of 0 or 1 and at least a 1-point reduction relative to baseline. Otherwise, the participant is a non-responder. On all IGA scales, a decrease in score relates to an improvement in signs and symptoms. | At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US): Number of participants with CLA-IGA-R erythema score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-point reduction relative to baseline | The CLA-IGA-R is a tool that scores the three key disease components (erythema; OMC and follicular activity) of CLE independently. The CLA-IGA-R erythema is scored on a five-point binary scale that provides a global clinical assessment ranging from 0 to 4 (0 indicates clear, 1 is almost clear, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate, and 4 indicates severe CLE). A responder is defined as a participant who achieves a CLA-IGA-R erythema score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-point reduction relative to baseline. Otherwise, the participant is a non-responder. On all IGA scales, a decrease in score relates to an improvement in signs and symptoms. | At Week 12 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US): Number of participants with CLA-IGA-R OMC score of 0 or 1 and at least a 1-point reduction relative to baseline | The CLA-IGA-R is a tool that scores the three key disease components (erythema; OMC, and follicular activity) of CLE independently. The CLA-IGA-R OMC is scored on a five-point binary scale that provides a global clinical assessment ranging from 0 to 4 (0 indicates clear, 1 is almost clear, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate, and 4 indicates severe CLE). A responder (yes/no) is defined as a participant who achieves a CLA- IGA-R OMC score of 0 or 1 and at least a 1-point reduction relative to baseline. Otherwise, the participant is a non-responder. On all IGA scales, a decrease in score relates to an improvement in signs and symptoms. | At Week 12 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (EU/ROW): Number of participants with CLASI-70 response | The CLASI is a validated index used for assessing the cutaneous lesions of SLE. CLASI-70 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a 70% reduction relative to baseline in CLASI-A score. Otherwise, the participant is considered a non-responder. | At Week 12 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US/EU/ROW): Change from baseline in Skindex-29+3 domain scores | The Skindex-29+3 is based on a previous instrument, the Skindex-29 and has been modified to include items related to CLE. The instrument consists of 33 items, which are used to calculate 4 domains: Symptoms (7 items), Emotions (10 items), Functioning (12 items), and Lupus-specific (3 items). The remaining item asks the participants to rate how often they worry about side effects from treatment; however, this item is not used to calculate the domain scores. The response options are on a 5-point verbal rating scale, ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All the time). The instrument has a recall period of the previous 4 weeks. Each domain score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life. The symptom domain in the Skindex-29+3 evaluates the symptom burden of the disease and includes symptom concepts such as pain, itching, burning, stinging, and sensitivity. | At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US/EU/ROW): Serum trough (pre-dose) concentrations of anifrolumab | The Ctrough of subcutaneously administered anifrolumab in participants with chronic and/or subacute CLE will be evaluated. | Double-blind: Pre-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), Weeks 1, 4, 12, 24; Open-label: Weeks 40, and 52 or early discontinuation visit [EDV] and follow-up visit (13 Weeks after last dose) | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US/EU/ROW): Number of participants with positive antidrug antibody | The immunogenicity of subcutaneously administered anifrolumab in participants with chronic and/or subacute CLE will be evaluated. | Double-blind: Pre-dose on Day 1 (Week 0), Weeks 4, 12, and 24; Open-label: Pre-dose on Weeks 40, and 52 or EDV and follow-up visit (13 weeks after last dose) | |
Secondary | Stage 1 and Stage 2 (US/EU/ROW): Percent change from baseline in suppression of the Interferon 21-gene | The pharmacodynamics of subcutaneously administered anifrolumab in participants with chronic and/or subacute CLE will be evaluated. | Double-blind: Day 1 (Week 0), Week 1, 4, 12, and 24; Open-label; Week 40 and 52 or EDV and follow-up visit (13 weeks after last dose) | |
Secondary | Stage 2 (US/EU/ROW): Number of participants with = 7-point reduction from baseline in CLASI-A total score | The CLASI is a validated index used for assessing the cutaneous lesions of SLE. It consists of 2 separate scores: i) activity of the disease, and ii) measure of damage. The CLASI instrument will be used at each study visit to capture individual skin manifestation scores. A 7-point reduction CLASI-A is established as clinically meaningful improvement in disease for CLE and as being impactful for patients. Achieving a CLASI-A total score of 9 or below is an accepted threshold for mild disease. | At Week 24 | |
Secondary | Stage 2 (US): Number of participants who are CLA-IGA-R erythema responders from Week 24 up to and including Week 52 | The CLA-IGA-R is an assessment tool that scores the three key disease components (erythema; OMC and follicular activity) of CLE independently. The CLA-IGA-R erythema is scored on a five-point binary scale that provides a global clinical assessment ranging from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates clear, 1 is almost clear, 2 is mild, 3 is moderate, and 4 indicates severe CLE. On all IGA scales, a decrease in score relates to an improvement in signs and symptoms. Assessment of CLA-IGA-R erythema score captures changes in erythema, a clinically important feature in CLE patients. A responder is defined as a participant who achieves a CLA- IGA-R erythema score of 0 or 1 and at least a 2-point reduction relative to baseline. Otherwise, the participant is a non-responder. Amongst participants randomized to anifrolumab during the double-blind treatment period, the number of participants who maintained a CLA-IGA-R erythema response from Week 24 up to Week 52 will be evaluated. | Up to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Stage 2 (EU): Number of participants who are CLASI-70 responders up to and including Week 52 | The CLASI is a validated index used for assessing the cutaneous lesions of SLE. CLASI-70 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a 70% reduction relative to baseline in CLASI-A score. Otherwise, the participant is considered a non-responder. Amongst participants randomized to anifrolumab during the double-blind treatment period, the number of participants who maintained a CLASI-70 response from Week 24 up to Week 52 will be evaluated. | Up to Week 52 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01776190 -
Low-dose UVA1 Radiation in Cutaneous Lupus Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00420173 -
Interdisciplinary Study Group of Lupus Erythematosus (ISGLE)
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04809623 -
Study of Edecesertib in Participants With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE)
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01300208 -
To Evaluate the Preliminary Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of CC-11050 in Subjects With Discoid Lupus Erythematosus and Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT01470313 -
A Multiple Dose Study Of PD-0360324 In Patients With Active Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01146444 -
Sunscreens in Patients With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus(CLE)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03134222 -
Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib and Lanraplenib in Females With Moderately-to-Severely Active Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01629784 -
Effectiveness of a Knowledge-based Intervention for Patients With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00470912 -
Sunscreen RV 2457C in Photoinduced CLE
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01841619 -
IVIg Efficacy Study to Treat Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
|
Phase 0 | |
Completed |
NCT00523588 -
Treatment of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE) With the 595 nm Flashlamp Pulsed Dye Laser
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06411106 -
Deep Phenotyping of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01498406 -
Vitamin D Status, Disease Specific and Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients With Cutaneous Lupus
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04647708 -
Study of M5049 in CLE and SLE Participants
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03817424 -
A Study to Evaluate VIB7734 in Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE), Sjogren's Syndrome, Systemic Sclerosis, Polymyositis, and Dermatomyositis
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03260166 -
Nicotinamide Treatment for Lupus-associated Skin Lesions in Lupus Erythematosus
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00317681 -
Efficacy of Topical Tacrolimus in Different Subtypes With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04781816 -
Proof of Concept Study of SAR443122 in Patients With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus
|
Phase 2 |