View clinical trials related to Crush Injuries.
Filter by:This study is an experimental study. The main caregivers of pressure injury patients in the plastics surgery ward and general medicine ward of the hospital in Taipei City who are over 20 years old, have good communication skills in Chinese and Taiwanese or who can read Chinese are the research objects. During the study process, pre-tests will be given to the accepted subjects, which are the correctness evaluation scale of caregiver's pressure injury wound dressing change and caregiver self-efficacy scale, and then the accepted subjects will be divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group will receive interventions of virtual reality and artificial intelligence wound detecting system, while the control group maintained the traditional pressure injury health education with oral introduction and health education leaflet. After the intervention measures are given, a post-test (same as the pre-test content) will be conducted within two days. Finally, analyze the effectiveness of the intervention of virtual reality pressure injury education video and artificial intelligence wound detecting system on caregivers of pressure injury improve wound care correctness and increase self-efficacy.
The study aimed to investigate anesthesia management of pediatric patients in the Ankara Bilkent City Hospital during the earthquake disaster of February 6.
This study is an open-label, single-center trial which aim to evaluate of efficacy and safety of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in stage 3 and 4 stress injury.
Pressure ulcers are a global issue and substantial concern for healthcare systems. A review of the literature between January 2000 and December 2012 has revealed that prevalence rate of pressure ulcers in aged care facilities were between 4.1% and 32.2%, and the incidence rates ranged from 1.9% to 59%. Similarly, a systematic review reported that the prevalence of pressure ulcer varied between 0.3% and 46%, and the incidence of pressure ulcer ranged from 0.8% to 34%. Most epidemiological data were obtained from hospitals (38.7%) and institutional long-term care facilities (29.7%). The costs associated with pressure ulcers are considerable. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (2011), the US healthcare system has allocated approximately $ 9.1 - $ 11.6 billion annually for the health care cost of pressure ulcer. In addition to direct treatment-related costs, the development of pressure ulcer also results in litigation and government penalties, and affects hospital performance metrics. A systematic review has reported that the cost for treatment of pressure ulcer was higher than its prevention. That is, the cost per patient per day ranged from € 1.71 to € 470.49 (for treatment) and from € 2.65 to € 87.57 (for prevention) across all settings. This randomized controlled trial will be performed in a general hospital in a random sample of 308 patients (nursing wards geriatric n=3 and orthopedic (n=3)) who are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. Patients will be included in the study for a period > 2 hospitalisation days. Skin assessment and risk factor registration will be done on a daily base by the ward nurses. Reliability checks and time measurements will be completed by the researcher.
The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Prontosan wound irrigation solution comparing with Normal Saline on the removal of wound bacterial biofilm through observing the morphological characteristics and development of bacterial biofilm in chronic wound patients with secondary infections. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B . - Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups. - 4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups. - Wound healing rate - Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score. - Distribution of inflammatory cells on the wound. - Detection rate of bacteria/drug-resistant bacteria on the wound and their correlation with the detection rate of bacterial biofilm. Participants will be randomized to experimental group or Control group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution or normal saline will be extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution or normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
The study aims to effectively identify the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries (IAPI) in surgical patients through a prospective multicenter approach. It combines indicators from commonly used assessment tools and practical experience judgments to construct a comprehensive assessment framework. By incorporating various indicators, the study aims to improve the accuracy and reliability of identifying patients at risk of IAPI during surgery. This will help clinicians in making informed decisions and implementing preventive measures to minimize the occurrence of pressure injuries. The multicenter approach ensures a diverse and representative sample of patients from different surgical settings. This increases the generalizability of the study findings and enhances the applicability of the assessment framework across various clinical settings. The project's methodology involves collecting data on patient demographics, medical history, surgical procedure details, and assessment tool scores. These data points will be analyzed to identify significant risk factors for IAPI and develop a risk prediction model. The study also takes into consideration practical experience judgments, which acknowledge the importance of clinical expertise in assessing patients' risk of IAPI. This ensures that the assessment framework is not solely reliant on assessment tools but also incorporates the insights of experienced clinicians. Overall, this prospective multicenter study aims to contribute to the field by providing a comprehensive and practical approach to identify the risk of IAPI in surgical patients. The findings from this study can be utilized in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of pressure injuries during surgery.
Background and importance: In 2003, a pressure injury is listed as one of the indicators of care quality in clinical setting by Taiwan joint commission on hospital accreditation. That reflects that a pressure injury is a significant heath care issue. Nowadays, it still constantly happens at hospitals, home, and nursing homes: Pressure injuries cause pain, and increase length of hospital stay, rehospitalization rate, and death rate. In current clinical practice, standardized guidelines and basic principles are followed for pressure injury management, and it is found that most of the caregivers are unsure about what are the consequences of having pressure injuries and how to manage and prevent them. Therefore, the caregivers are more passive, and feel nervous and confused. In literature, there are guidelines for pressure injury prevention and management. However, they are primarily designed for heath professionals. As a result, to achieve evidence-based practice and knowledge translation, I hope to make individual management plans for each patient, provide caring support, and follow up with patients. And caregivers can benefit from knowledge, attitude, practice, and caring effect.
Pressure injuries, local areas of damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue that are costly and painful, are often preventable with timely use of prevention strategies. Identifying early pressure induced tissue damage among nursing home residents by nursing staff during routine skin assessment is critical for this process. Finding early damage can prompt nursing home staff to start prevention actions and may allow viable tissue rescue, reducing other health problems or death. We propose use of sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) measures as the cue for nursing home staff to start prevention care. SEM provides early detection of skin damage by as much as 5 to 10 days prior to other methods, eliminates the inherent structural bias in visual skin assessment for residents with dark skin tones, and demonstrates a model of care using technology innovation in poorly-resourced healthcare settings to provide bedside, real-time, point-of-care feedback that is can be used immediately by nursing staff. In this study, nursing staff will use a device (the Provizio SEM Scanner) as part of standard skin assessments. The staff will use the values from the Provizio SEM Scanner during these assessments to decide if residents need preventive care for their skin. The study will look at these decisions and residents' subsequent health outcomes. The study will also use information about residents' skin health and prevention actions during the 52 weeks before the study as a comparison.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of an individualized nutrition intervention package on pressure injury healing rates, prevention of new pressure injuries, complications, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness in adult on home nursing care with pressure injuries staged II and above in Singapore. Study Design: A two-group, non-blinded, randomized, pragmatic clinical trial with a cost-effectiveness analysis. Location/ Setting: Community Participants: Adults (aged 21 years and above) receiving home nursing care with at least one pressure injury (Stage II, III, IV, or Unstageable). 190 subjects per arm Intervention: The intervention group will receive an individualized nutrition intervention package consisting of individualized nutritional supplementation, specialized nutritional education pamphlets, regular dietetic support via home visits or telehealth, and home nursing care by nurses trained in nutrition care. The control group will receive specialized nutritional educational pamphlets, and home nursing care by nurses trained in nutrition care, with or without nutritional supplementation. Outcome Measures: Main outcomes of wound area reduction, and proportion of participants with >40% area reduction at 30 days, 60 days and 90 days. Secondary outcomes include proportion of participants and wounds with increasing severity of PI stages (e.g., stage II to stage III), improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and nutritional status, and incidence of wound infections at 30 days, 60 days and 90 days, proportion of participants with complete healing, mortality and unplanned hospital admissions. Economic Evaluation: The primary economic outcome will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per pressure injury prevented, with a time horizon of 1 year for intervention versus control during the period of intervention (3-months) and up to a year. Statistical Analyses: Individual patient level analysis will be performed as per our primary analysis, and we will also perform cluster level analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) will be determined using Cox proportional hazards models and their corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI). Imbalances in individual level data will be accounted for using statistical adjustment in a Mixed-Effects Cox Regression model. Hypothesis: This study aims to provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a individualized and protocolized nutrition intervention package for pressure injury management in home care patients. The findings could inform the development of evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for nutritional care and education in this vulnerable population, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs associated with pressure injuries.
Background：Pressure injuries (PI) are one of the common comorbidities in surgery, meaning PI that occurs immediately after surgery or within hours to 3 days after surgery. The incidence of PI in spine surgery is about 5% ~ 66%. Purpose：Comparison of the difference in pressure injury rates positioning device cotton roll-coated viscoelastic polymer pads versus viscoelastic polymer pads for pressure injuries undergoing lumbar spine surgery Methods：This experimental study used a split-body design with random assignment to compare the pressure-reducing effects of different materials on a patient's body contact points with a positioning device. The experimental group used a Relton-Hall prone frame with cotton roll-coated 3 cm viscoelastic polymer pads, while the control group used a Relton-Hall prone frame with a viscoelastic polymer pads.