Crowding, Tooth Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Influence of Showing Patients the Three-dimensional Digital Simulation of Their Teeth Alignment Produced by Orthodontic Treatment With Fixed Appliance on Their Expectations and Satisfaction
Verified date | November 2022 |
Source | Damascus University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Patients who have moderate crowding will be treated in this study. The efficacy of showing the predicted alignment of patient's teeth at the end of orthodontic treatment previously to treatment on their expectations from orthodontic treatment and their satisfaction with their teeth alignment will be assessed.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 25 |
Est. completion date | November 5, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | June 5, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 24 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Class I malocclusion with moderate crowding (between 4-6 mm of tooth-size-arch-length-discrepancy). - Good oral hygiene and periodontal health. - No severe skeletal discrepancy. - Normal proclination for the upper and lower incisors. Exclusion Criteria: - Bimaxillary dentoalveolar severe protrusion. - Need for extraction. - Previous orthodontic treatment. - Subject with psychological abnormalities. - congenitally missing or extracted teeth (except for the third molars). - history of previous trauma to the maxillofacial region or surgical interventions. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Syrian Arab Republic | Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School | Damascus |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Damascus University |
Syrian Arab Republic,
Buschang PH, Ross M, Shaw SG, Crosby D, Campbell PM. Predicted and actual end-of-treatment occlusion produced with aligner therapy. Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):723-7. doi: 10.2319/043014-311.1. Epub 2014 Nov 5. — View Citation
Grünheid T, Loh C, Larson BE. How accurate is Invisalign in nonextraction cases? Are predicted tooth positions achieved? Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):809-815. doi: 10.2319/022717-147.1. Epub 2017 Jul 7. — View Citation
Hadadpour S, Noruzian M, Abdi AH, Baghban AA, Nouri M. Can 3D imaging and digital software increase the ability to predict dental arch form after orthodontic treatment? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Dec;156(6):870-877. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.07.009. — View Citation
Izhar A, Singh G, Goyal V, Singh R, Gupta N, Pahuja P. Comparative Assessment of Clinical and Predicted Treatment Outcomes of Clear Aligner Treatment: An in Vivo Study. Turk J Orthod. 2019 Dec 1;32(4):229-235. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.19019. eCollection 2019 Dec. — View Citation
Noroozi H, Djavid GE, Moeinzad H, Teimouri AP. Prediction of arch perimeter changes due to orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Dec;122(6):601-7. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in patient's expectation towards teeth alignment: | Patients will be asked: Do you expect the orthodontic treatment to straighten your teeth? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not expected. Grades 1-3 = less expected. Grades 4-6 = average expected. Grades 7-9 = highly expected. Grade 10 = most expected. |
T0: 1 week before placing brackets, T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment | |
Primary | Change in patient's expectation towards smile improvement | Patients will be asked: Do you expect the orthodontic treatment to produce a better smile? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not expected. Grades 1-3 = less expected. Grades 4-6 = average expected. Grades 7-9 = highly expected. Grade 10 = most expected. |
T0: 1 week before placing brackets, T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment | |
Primary | Change in patient's expectation towards chewing improvement | Patients will be asked: Do you expect the orthodontic treatment to make it easier to eat? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not expected. Grades 1-3 = less expected. Grades 4-6 = average expected. Grades 7-9 = highly expected. Grade 10 = most expected. |
T0: 1 week before placing brackets, T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment | |
Primary | Change in patient's expectations towards speech improvement | Patients will be asked: Do you expect the orthodontic treatment to make it easier to speak? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not expected. Grades 1-3 = less expected. Grades 4-6 = average expected. Grades 7-9 = highly expected. Grade 10 = most expected. |
T0: 1 week before placing brackets, T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment | |
Primary | Change in patient's expectations towards oral hygiene improvement | Patients will be asked: Do you expect the orthodontic treatment to make it easier to keep your teeth clean? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not expected. Grades 1-3 = less expected. Grades 4-6 = average expected. Grades 7-9 = highly expected. Grade 10 = most expected |
T0: 1 week before placing brackets, T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment | |
Primary | Change in patient's expectations towards getting a better career | Patients will be asked: Do you expect the orthodontic treatment to improve your chance of a good career? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not expected. Grades 1-3 = less expected. Grades 4-6 = average expected. Grades 7-9 = highly expected. Grade 10 = most expected. |
T0: 1 week before placing brackets, T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment | |
Primary | Change in patient's expectations towards getting a better social confidence | Patients will be asked: Do you expect the orthodontic treatment to give you confidence socially? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not expected. Grades 1-3 = less expected. Grades 4-6 = average expected. Grades 7-9 = highly expected. Grade 10 = most expected. Scores of questions 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 will be summed to obtain total expectation's score. Questionnaires applied by patients at (T0) and (T1) will be compared by: Comparing each question individually between T0 and T1. Comparing questionnaire's overall score between T0 and T1. |
T0: 1 week before placing brackets, T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment | |
Primary | Changes in patient's satisfaction with teeth appearance | Patients will be asked: Are you satisfied with your teeth appearance? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not satisfied. Grades 1-3 = less satisfied. Grades 4-6 = average satisfaction. Grades 7-9 = highly satisfied. Grade 10 = most satisfied |
T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment, T2: at the end of treatment after removing brackets | |
Primary | Changes in patient's satisfaction with frontal teeth relationship | Patients will be asked: express your satisfaction with your frontal teeth relationship? Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not satisfied. Grades 1-3 = less satisfied. Grades 4-6 = average satisfaction. Grades 7-9 = highly satisfied. Grade 10 = most satisfied |
T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment, T2: at the end of treatment after removing brackets | |
Primary | Changes in patient's satisfaction level with teeth alignment | Patients will be asked: express your satisfaction with teeth alignment. Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not satisfied. Grades 1-3 = less satisfied. Grades 4-6 = average satisfaction. Grades 7-9 = highly satisfied. Grade 10 = most satisfied |
T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment, T2: at the end of treatment after removing brackets | |
Primary | Changes in patient's satisfaction level with teeth engagement | Patients will be asked: express your satisfaction with teeth engagement. Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10.
Grade 0 = not satisfied. Grades 1-3 = less satisfied. Grades 4-6 = average satisfaction. Grades 7-9 = highly satisfied. Grade 10 = most satisfied |
T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment, T2: at the end of treatment after removing brackets | |
Primary | Patient's overall satisfaction level with his teeth alignment following checking the predicated plan | Patients will be asked: express your overall satisfaction with your teeth after watching your predicted teeth alignment.
Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10. Grade 0 = not satisfied. Grades 1-3 = less satisfied. Grades 4-6 = average satisfaction. Grades 7-9 = highly satisfied. Grade 10 = most satisfied. |
T1: patient's second visit to clinician to begin the orthodontic treatment and after 15 minutes of showing patient the digital simulation of their teeth alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment | |
Primary | Patient's overall satisfaction with his teeth at the end of orthodontic treatment | Question will be answered on paper using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with grades from 0 to 10. Grade 0 = not satisfied. Grades 1-3 = less satisfied. Grades 4-6 = average satisfaction. Grades 7-9 = highly satisfied. Grade 10 = most satisfied
Scores of questions 7-8-9-10-11-12 will be summed to obtain total expected satisfaction's score. Scores of questions 7-8-9-10-11-13 will be summed to obtain total eventual satisfaction's score. Questionnaires applied by patients at (T1) and (T2) will be compared by: Comparing each question individually between T1 and T2. Comparing questionnaire's overall score between T1 and T2. |
T2:at the end of orthodontic treatment after removing brackets] Patients will be asked: express your overall satisfaction with your teeth at the end of treatment. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05500456 -
The Effectiveness of Clear Aligner and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Achieving Good Occlusion in Complex Orthodontic Cases
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05664282 -
Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05250921 -
Evaluation of the Patient Experience With a Surgically-assisted Acceleration Method of Orthodontic Treatment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04151875 -
Effect of Extraction Vs Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment on Vertical Facial Dimension
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04347018 -
BRIUS Vs FFA Efficiency
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03310086 -
Acceleration of Lower Anterior Teeth Leveling and Alignment Using Corticision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05390320 -
Dental and Periodontal Changes Following the Acceleration of Alignment of Crowded Lower Anterior Teeth Using a Surgical Technique
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05469451 -
Effect of the Diode Laser (940nm) on Orthodontics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04070001 -
The Effects of Ibuprofen and Laser on Orthodontic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04887974 -
Canine Retraction With Temporary Anchorage Devices
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05416242 -
Patient-centered Outcomes During Using Self-ligating Brackets With or Without Piezocision vs Traditional Brackets
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04905004 -
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
|
N/A |