Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06045754
Other study ID # Vedolizumab-4051
Secondary ID MACS-2022-120102
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date April 18, 2024
Est. completion date June 28, 2027

Study information

Verified date June 2024
Source Takeda
Contact Takeda Contact
Phone +1-877-825-3327
Email medinfoUS@takeda.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The main aim of this study is to learn about the effect of treatment with vedolizumab IV (vedolizumab) together with adalimumab or vedolizumab together with ustekinumab in adults with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease, and the effect of treatment with vedolizumab alone, after the dual targeted treatment. The study is conducted in two parts. In Part A, participants will receive the dual targeted treatment (vedolizumab together with either adalimumab or ustekinumab). In part B, participants will receive vedolizumab only. Part B will include participants who responded to the treatment in Part A. Each participant will be followed up for at least 26 weeks after the last dose of treatment.


Description:

The drug being tested in this study is vedolizumab. Vedolizumab is being tested to treat people with moderate to severe Crohn's disease who have experienced inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to either one prior interleukin [IL] antagonist (Cohort 1) or one prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor [TNFi] (Cohort 2). The study will look at the efficacy and safety of dual targeted therapy. The study will enroll approximately 150 patients. Participants will be assigned to one of the two treatment groups in Part A: - Part A, Cohort 1: Vedolizumab + Adalimumab - Part A, Cohort 2: Vedolizumab + Ustekinumab All participants who achieve clinical remission in Part A will receive vedolizumab IV 300 mg monotherapy from Week 30 until Week 46 in Part B. Participants will be followed for a further 20-week safety follow-up period to Week 72 (or 26 weeks post-last dose of study drug). This multi-center trial will be conducted in the United States and Canada. The overall time to participate in this study is approximately 76 weeks.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 150
Est. completion date June 28, 2027
Est. primary completion date June 28, 2027
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Part A: 1. Has a confirmed diagnosis of CD at least 3 months before baseline, based on endoscopy results. 2. Has moderately to severely active CD at Screening, defined as a CDAI score =220 and a SES-CD =6 (=4 if isolated ileal disease). 3. Has demonstrated at least 1 of the following (a, b, or c) to at least 1 IL antagonist or at least 1 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist, at doses approved for the treatment of CD: 1. Inadequate response after completing the full induction regimen; 2. Loss of response (recurrence of symptoms during scheduled maintenance dosing after prior clinical benefit); or 3. Intolerance (a significant adverse event that precluded further use, including but not limited to serious infection including opportunistic infections, malignancy, infusion-related and hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis, and liver injury). Note: Participants with primary nonresponse to =2 agents are not eligible. Participants with intolerance to 2 agents may be eligible at the investigator's discretion. Part B: 4. Participant is in clinical remission at Week 26. Note: Participants exhibiting a clinical response (defined as a = 100-point decrease in CDAI) at Week 26 may enter Part B at the investigator's discretion. Exclusion Criteria: 1. A current diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis. 2. Clinical evidence of a current abdominal abscess or a history of prior abdominal abscess. 3. Known fistula (other than perianal fistula) or phlegmon. 4. Known perianal fistula with abscess. 5. Ileostomy, colostomy, or severe, or symptomatic stenosis of the intestine. 6. Previous extensive colon resection with =2 colonic segments remaining, performed = 6 months prior to screening. 7. Short bowel syndrome. 8. Any planned surgical intervention for CD, except for seton placement for perianal fistula without abscess. 9. History or evidence of adenomatous colonic polyps that have not been removed. 10. History or evidence of colonic mucosal dysplasia. 11. Intolerance or contraindication to ileocolonoscopy. 12. Any identified congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (eg, common variable immunodeficiency, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection). 13. Active or latent tuberculosis (TB), regardless of treatment history. 14. A positive test for hepatitis B virus (HBV) as defined by the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) test. 15. A positive test for hepatitis C virus (HCV), as defined by a positive hepatitis C virus antibody (HCVAb) test and detectable HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA). 16. Primary nonresponse to =2 IL antagonists (Cohort 1) or =2 TNF antagonists (Cohort 2) for the treatment of CD. 17. Received approved or investigational anti-integrin antibodies (i.e., vedolizumab, natalizumab, efalizumab, etrolizumab, abrilumab [AMG 181], anti- mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 [MAdCAM-1] antibodies, or rituximab). 18. History of or symptoms of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in the investigator's opinion. If a participant has symptoms consistent with PML, a PML checklist must be completed and submitted to the PML independent adjudication committee (IAC). If the PML IAC deems the participant to have PML, the participant is ineligible.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Vedolizumab
Vedolizumab intravenous infusion.
Adalimumab
Adalimumab subcutaneous injection.
Ustekinumab
Ustekinumab intravenous infusion.
Ustekinumab
Ustekinumab subcutaneous injection.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Covenant Health Edmonton Alberta
Canada London Health Sciences Centre London Ontario
Canada West GTA Endoscopy Inc. Mississauga Ontario
Canada McGill University Health Centre Montreal General Hospital Montreal Quebec
Canada Viable Clinical Research - North Bay North Bay Ontario
Canada Toronto Immune and Digestive Health Institute Inc. (TIDHI) North York Ontario
Canada ABP Research Services Corp. Oakville Ontario
Canada Taunton Surgical Centre Oshawa Ontario
Canada Toronto Digestive Disease Associates (TDDA) Specialty Research Vaughan Ontario
United States Washington Gastroenterology- GIA Bellevue Washington
United States Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Cedar Park Cedar Park Texas
United States University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois
United States University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio
United States Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC Clinton Township Michigan
United States Ohio Gastroenterology group, Inc. Columbus Ohio
United States GI Alliance - Digestive Health Associates of Texas Dallas Texas
United States Digestive Health Specialsits Dothan Alabama
United States GI Alliance - Illinois Gastroenterology Group - Glenview Glenview Illinois
United States GI Alliance - Illinois Gastroenterology Group LLC - Gurnee Gurnee Illinois
United States Medical Research Center of Connecticut, LLC Hamden Connecticut
United States The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas
United States Mid-America Gastro-Intestinal Consultants Kansas City Missouri
United States University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City Kansas
United States University of California San Diego Health (UCSD) La Jolla California
United States BVL Clinical Research Liberty Missouri
United States Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California
United States University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky
United States Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Lubbock Lubbock Texas
United States GI Alliance - Mansfield Mansfield Texas
United States Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research, LLC Mentor Ohio
United States GI Alliance Metairie Louisiana
United States Hoag Hospital Newport Beach Newport Beach California
United States Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc. Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States Hightower Clinical - SSM Health Oklahoma City Oklahoma
United States Endoscopic Research Inc Orlando Florida
United States University Gastroenterology Providence Rhode Island
United States Wake Research Associates, LLC Raleigh North Carolina
United States Rapid City Medical Center, LLP Rapid City South Dakota
United States Gastroenterology Consultants, P.C. Roswell Georgia
United States Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri
United States University of Utah Health Salt Lake City Utah
United States Southern Star Research Institute, LLC. San Antonio Texas
United States Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle Washington
United States Texas Digestive Disease Consultants (TDDC), Southlake Southlake Texas
United States GI Alliance Sun City Sun City Arizona
United States Washington Gastroenterology- GIA Tacoma Washington
United States Alliance Clinical Research of Tampa, LLC Tampa Florida
United States Cotton ONeil Clinical Research Center Topeka Kansas
United States Tyler Research Institute, LLC Tyler Texas
United States Huron Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. Ypsilanti Michigan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Takeda

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 26 Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of =150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity. Week 26
Primary Part B: Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission Based on the CDAI at Week 52 Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of =150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity. Week 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on the CDAI at Week 12 Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of =150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity. Week 12
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving 2-item Patient-reported Outcome Measure (PRO2) Remission at Weeks 12, 26, and 52 Clinical remission based on PRO2 is defined as PRO2 score =8 from baseline. The PRO2 is comprised of the stool frequency and abdominal pain components of the CDAI. The PRO-2 score is the sum of the abdominal pain and stool frequency subscores of the CDAI score. The average daily number of liquid or very soft stools and abdominal pain score (with 0 indicating no pain and 3 indicating severe pain) are weighted according to the CDAI multiplication factors (2 for stool frequency and 5 for abdominal pain). A higher score indicates more frequent stools and more severe abdominal pain. Weeks 12, 26 and 52
Secondary Change in PRO2 Score from Week 26 to 52 The PRO2 is comprised of the stool frequency and abdominal pain components of the CDAI. The PRO-2 score is the sum of the abdominal pain and stool frequency subscores of the CDAI score. The average daily number of liquid or very soft stools and abdominal pain score (with 0 indicating no pain and 3 indicating severe pain) are weighted according to the CDAI multiplication factors (2 for stool frequency and 5 for abdominal pain). A higher score indicates more frequent stools and more severe abdominal pain. Weeks 26 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants with Stool Frequency Remission at Weeks 12, 26, and 52 Stool frequency remission is defined as average daily number of liquid or very soft stools =3 and not worse than baseline assessed as per the stool frequency subscore of the CDAI score. The average daily number is weighted according to the CDAI multiplication factor of 2 for stool frequency. A higher score indicates more frequent stools. Weeks 12, 26, and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants with Abdominal Pain Remission at Weeks 12, 26, and 52 Abdominal pain remission is defined as abdominal pain score =1, and not worse than baseline assessed as per the abdominal pain subscore of the CDAI score. The abdominal pain score (with 0 indicating no pain and 3 indicating severe pain) is weighted according to the CDAI multiplication factor of 5. A higher score indicates more severe abdominal pain. Weeks 12, 26, and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission Based on Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) at Weeks 26 and 52 Endoscopic remission as per SES-CD is defined as SES-CD score from 0-2. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of surface area (SA) that is ulcerated, percentage of SA affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic remission based on SES-CD at either Week 26 or Week 52 will be reported in this outcome measure. Weeks 26 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission Based on SES-CD at Both Weeks 26 and 52 Endoscopic remission as per SES-CD is defined as SES-CD score from 0-2. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of surface area (SA) that is ulcerated, percentage of SA affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic remission based on SES-CD at both Weeks 26 and 52 will be reported in this outcome measure. Weeks 26 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Exhibiting an Endoscopic Response Based on SES-CD at Weeks 26 and 52 Endoscopic response is defined as SES-CD reduction by =50% from Baseline. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is the most severe case, with the sum of the scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Weeks 26 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants in Deep Remission Based on the CDAI and SES-CD at Weeks 26 and 52 Deep remission:CDAI <150 points and SES-CD 0-2. CDAI assesses CD per clinical signs such as number of liquid/soft stools,abdominal pain,general wellbeing,extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use,presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. It has 8 factors each summed after adjustment with weighting factor; total score:0 to 600 points, higher scores=more severity. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables(ulcer size, percentage of ulcerated surface area, percentage of affected surface area, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0=none or not severe to 3=most severe case; sum of the scores range from 0 to 15, except for narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11. Overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables. Higher scores=more severe disease. Participants achieving deep remission at either Week 26 or 52 will be assessed in this outcome measure. Weeks 26 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants in Deep Remission Based on the CDAI and SES-CD at Both Weeks 26 and 52 Deep remission:CDAI <150 points and SES-CD 0-2. CDAI assesses CD per clinical signs such as number of liquid/soft stools,abdominal pain,general wellbeing,extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use,presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. It has 8 factors each summed after adjustment with weighting factor; total score:0 to 600 points, higher scores=more severity. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables(ulcer size, percentage of ulcerated surface area, percentage of affected surface area, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0=none or not severe to 3=most severe case; sum of the scores range from 0 to 15, except for narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11. Overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables. Higher scores=more severe disease. Participants achieving deep remission at both Weeks 26 and 52 will be assessed in this outcome measure. Weeks 26 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Exhibiting a Clinical Response Based on the CDAI at Weeks 12, 26, and 52 Clinical response is defined as =100-point decrease from Baseline in CDAI score. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity. Weeks 12, 26, and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants Using Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline who have Discontinued Corticosteroids and are in Clinical Remission Based on the CDAI Percentage of participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who have discontinued corticosteroids and are in clinical remission per CDAI will be reported. Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of =150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity. Week 30 through Week 64
Secondary Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Endoscopic Healing Based on SES-CD at Weeks 26 and 52 Complete endoscopic healing is defined as SES-CD score =4 with a =2-point decrease from baseline and no individual subscore >1. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is the most severe case, with the sum of the scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Weeks 26 and 52
Secondary Change in SES-CD from Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of the surface area that is ulcerated, percentage of the surface area affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is the most severe case, with the sum of the scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is the sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Baseline, Weeks 26 and 52
Secondary Percentage of Participants with First CD Exacerbation After 26 Weeks CD exacerbation is defined as a >70-point increase in CDAI from the prior visit on 2 occasions separated by a 2-week interval, and either CRP above normal or fecal calprotectin [FCP] >250 micrograms per gram (µg/g). CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity. Week 26 through Week 52
Secondary Change in FCP Concentrations from Baseline to Weeks 12, 26, 42, and 52 Baseline, Weeks 12, 26, 42, and 52
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT03815851 - Relationship Between Prophylactic Drainage and Postoperative Complications (PPOI) in Crohn's Patients After Surgery N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06100289 - A Study of Vedolizumab in Children and Teenagers With Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease Phase 3
Completed NCT02883452 - A Phase I Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy and Safety of CT-P13 Subcutaneous in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04777656 - Use of Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet on Top of Standard Therapy Versus Standard Therapy Alone in Unstable Pediatric Crohn's Disease Patients. Phase 3
Terminated NCT03017014 - A Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Adalimumab for Treating Children and Adolescents With Crohn's Disease in Real Life Conditions
Recruiting NCT06053424 - Positron Emission Tomography Study of Changes in [11C]AZ14132516 Uptake Following Administration of AZD7798 to Healthy Participants and Patients With Crohn's Disease Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05428345 - A Study of Vedolizumab SC Given to Adults With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease in South Korea
Completed NCT02508012 - Medico-economic Evaluation of the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-TNF-α Agents in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02858557 - The Effect of Diet on Microbial Profile and Disease Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases N/A
Terminated NCT02882841 - MOlecular BIomarkers and Adherent and Invasive Escherichia Coli (AIEC) Detection Study In Crohn's Disease Patients N/A
Terminated NCT02417974 - Prevention of Recurrence of Crohn's Disease by Fecal Microbiota Therapy (FMT) Phase 2
Completed NCT02542917 - Home Versus Postal Testing for Faecal Calprotectin: a Feasibility Study
Completed NCT03010787 - A First Time in Human Study in Healthy Volunteers and Patients Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT02316678 - Patient Attitudes and Preferences for Outcomes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapeutics N/A
Completed NCT02193048 - Prospective Evaluation of a Scoring System in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Crohn's Disease
Completed NCT02154425 - A Multicenter, Postmarketing Study Evaluating the Concentration of Cimzia® in Mature Breast Milk of Lactating Mothers Phase 1
Completed NCT02265588 - Healthy Approach to Physical and Psychological Problems in Youngsters With IBD (HAPPY-IBD). N/A
Completed NCT02197780 - Head-to-head Comparison of Two Fecal Biomarkers to Screen Children for IBD N/A
Recruiting NCT02395354 - Comparative Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study of Endoscopic Treatment of Stenosis in Crohn´s Disease N/A
Completed NCT01958827 - A Study of Adalimumab After Dose Escalation in Japanese Subjects With Crohn's Disease Phase 3