View clinical trials related to Critically Ill.
Filter by:OPTIC is a prospective, open-label, non-randomized study of multiple medications administered to approximately 2000 children in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) per routine clinical car by their treating provider. The purpose of this study is to characterize the PK of drugs routinely administered to children per standard of care using opportunistic and scavenged samples. The prescribing of drugs to children will not be part of this protocol. After the child/adult (<21 years of age) is consented/enrolled, demographic and clinical data will be extracted from the EHR. Biospecimen information (including date and time of sample collection) will be collected. Data analysis will be conducted on all participants with at least 2 evaluable samples. The protocol represents minimal risk to the children/adults who provide body fluid for this study, including potential loss of confidentiality (samples will be assigned a unique accession number) and risks associated with blood draws. Adverse Events (AEs)/Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) caused by the study specimen collections will be monitored and recorded in the Electronic Data Capture (EDC) system.
Colistin is an antibiotic active against several classes of multi-resistant gram-negative bacteria; the drug should be used in high doses in patients on continuous renal replacement therapy, since the drug is eliminated through the dialysis filter. This is an Open-label, Phase 4, interventional, prospective, single-center pilot study aimed to analyze the concentrations of colistin in plasma and ultrafiltrate by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, in 20 critically ill patients admitted to intensive care and suffering from severe infections by multi-resistant bacteria, who receive continuous renal replacement therapy.
The use of physical restraints is common practice in Intensive Care Units (ICU). This medically prescribed procedure requires full attention of medical and paramedical teams for its implementation, monitoring and ending, as a major restriction of patients' individual freedom. French highest authority for health has defined, for geriatrics and psychiatric units, ten criteria of good practice for physical restraints' use. Routine practice reports critically ill patients' safety as main reason of use. This decision, often left to the sole discretion of nurses, varies according to their own representation of this risk, and depends on several factors: seniority in ICU, nurse to patient ratio and personal workload. In order to reduce practices subjectivity and heterogeneity, we have developed a decision-making tool for physical restraints implementation. This tool is based on objective scales used on a daily basis concerning neurological status (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU)). Disorientation or delirium can lead to severe incidents by promoting accidental removing of important devices such as arterial of venous line, drains among others. However, physical restraints are recognized as a major cause of delirium and agitation. Critically ill patients require rigorous evaluation of organ dysfunctions necessitating adequate invasive equipments, with associated risks of unexpected removal or alteration. Such events could urge caregivers to use physical restraints. Based on recent literature, about a third of ICU patients are restrained, and accidental deconditioning is mainly observed within these particular patients. In addition, three categories of patients have been defined according to the invasive nature of their equipment and therefore according to the risk associated with an unexpected withdrawal. Finally, presence of patient's family and their adherence to its surveillance were also implemented into the tool. Main study objective is to jointly investigate effectiveness and tolerance of a decision-making tool guiding physical restraints use in ICU patients.
The mini fluid challenge (mini_FC) is a functional hemodynamic test which has been used in different clinical contexts to assess fluid responsiveness. This test is performed by rapidly injecting a small aliquot of fluid (100 ml over 1 minute), which is followed by the infusion of the residual aliquot of fluid. Since the threshold of the mini_FC identified by the literature is rather small (5% of stroke volume (SV) increase after the 100 ml bolus to discriminate between responder and non-responder), it is crucial that the hemodynamic tool assessing this change could be reliable. Moreover, the SV changes with inspiratory/expiratory movements and the increase after the mini_FC should also consider the physiological fluctuations of the SV. In the literature this test has been performed by means of tolls with different least significant change of the SV. The least significant change (LSC) represents the smallest difference between successive measurements of SV that can be considered to be a real change and not attributable to chance. The purpose of this study is to assess the agreement among MOSTCARE system (4.5& of SV LSC described in the literature) and the echocardiography (about 10% of SV LSC described in the literature) with the PICCO system (about 1% of SV LSC described in the literature - considered the gold standard) in discriminating fluid responsiveness after a mini_FC
Is precariousness a risk factor for COVID-19 mortality in intensive care units ? Abstract Background: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the first wave overwhelmed hospitals in Paris area (Ile-de-France) with a variable impact depending on the territory. Several studies highlighted variable ICU mortality rates during COVID-19 surges across territories (10 to 60%) with higher rates in those most affected by poverty. We assessed the impact of precariousness, as an independent risk factor, on mortality linked to Covid-19 between ICUs at Delafontaine hospital and Ambroise Paré hospital. Method: Investigators carry out a retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive ICU patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted at Delafontaine and Ambroise Paré hospitals during the first wave of the Covid-19 outbreak in order to compare mortality rates according to predefined risk factors (age, diabetes, arterial hypertension, BMI, active solid or haematological cancer, IGS2, poverty rate at the threshold of 60% (%) according to the island grouped for statistical information (IRIS)37 of the patient, invasive ventilation or not) that include precariousness. Results: Conclusion:
The currently recruiting randomised controlled trial "Intensive Nutrition Therapy Compared to Usual Care in Critically Ill Adults" (INTENT, NCT03292237) is the first multi-centre trial to compare an intensive, individualised nutrition intervention to standard care for the duration of hospital admission in critically ill patients. INTENT-Muscle, is an observational longitudinal study nested within INTENT. The aim of INTENT-Muscle is to compare longitudinal changes in muscle health (assessed by bioimpedance and muscle ultrasound) in critically ill patients randomised to each arm of INTENT.
The investigators proposed that gabapentin will increase slow-wave sleep in adult critically ill patients. Increasing slow-wave sleep will improve the patients' outcomes (shortening ICU length of stay, improving ventilator free days, increasing delirium free days) in critically ill patients, a university hospital, Thailand.
Studying clinical characterization of critically ill COVID-19 patients in a single center Studying Risk factors for Day 28 Mortality in COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit
Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate using iohexol plasma clearance in critically ill patients with augmented renal creatinine clearance
Weaning ventilator support in critically ill patients is crucial. Both delayed extubation and unexpected early reintubation are harmful to the patients. Weaning parameters and spontaneous breathing trial are used to investigate the indication and predict the successful extubation. Hemodynamic stability and physical reserve are important indicators as well. Microcirculation parameters are known to be more sensitive to the change of hemodynamic status than macrocirculation parameters. We hypothesize that the change of sublingual microcirculation before and after spontaneous breathing trial is different between the the patients with successful extubation and the patients with failed extubation. Thus, this study measures sublingual microcirculation in patients receiving spontaneous breathing trial and record the extubation status (successful or failed). The microcirculation parameters before and after spontaneous breathing trial are compared between the the patients with successful extubation and the patients with failed extubation.