Ethnic and Gender Based Admittance Patterns in the ICU

Critical Illness Clinical Trial

— EGAP-ICU  

Official title:

Ethnic and Gender Based Admittance Patterns in the ICU, a Multicenter, International Randomized Survey Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05513456
• Other study ID #: EGAP-ICU Project Implicit
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Start date: April 2024
• Est. completion date: June 2025

Study information

• Verified date: March 2024
• Source: Karolinska Institutet
• Contact: Max Bell, MD, PhD
• Phone: +46708278533
• Email: max.bell[@]regionstockholm.se
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The dominating proportion of patients in the ICU are men. Studies indicate that men receive more mechanical ventilation, vasoactive drugs, renal replacement therapy, invasive monitoring and have longer length of stay in the ICU. These differences do not unambiguously translate into a survival benefit for men; if survival would be altered if women were admitted to ICU in the same extent is unknown.

Factors affecting ICU admission include age, co-morbidities, physiological parameters (indicating severity of the acute illness) and, additionally, the number of available ICU beds. Factors that should not affect ICU admission include patient gender or ethnicity.

This study aims at studying if bias against women and people of certain ethnicities exist. Do clinicians have differing thresholds for ICU admission due to non-medical reasons?

The investigators propose testing this hypothesis using a blinded randomized factorial survey study.

Description:

Background Differing treatment of men and women in several fields of health care is receiving growing attention. This includes care of the critically ill, as awareness of intensive care has dramatically increased during the last years. Critically ill patients are treated in Intensive Care Units (ICU), one of the most expensive and advanced types of care. It is therefore essential that resources are adequately used so that the patient most in need is selected for intensive care, but also that no patient in need is left without.

The dominating proportion of patients in the ICU are men. Studies indicate that men receive more mechanical ventilation, vasoactive drugs, renal replacement therapy, invasive monitoring and have longer length of stay in the ICU. It has also been shown that women and men with severe sepsis receive differential care in the emergency department. These differences do not unambiguously translate into a survival benefit for men; studies show conflicting results. One could only speculate if survival figures would be altered if women were admitted to ICU in the same extent. Sex is a biological variable that affects the immune system and changes throughout life. It is proposed that sex hormones have an impact on how the severity of an illness progresses, where female sex hormones are suggested to have a protective effect. This could partly explain male dominance in the ICU. There is no clear evidence that care given in the ICU should be tailored after the sex of the patient. Then again, there is no clear evidence that the medical care should not be tailored after the sex of the patient. Differing care provided to men and women is therefore controversial. If differences exist, it must be ruled out that it is caused by gender bias, unintentional or not.

As discussed in a recently published Guidance on Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals, Ethnicity are social constructs, without scientific or biological meaning. However, studies including ethnicity may be useful to improve understanding and knowledge of disparities and inequities in health care. Three decades ago, US Department of Health and Human Services published a report on Black and minority health, highlighting ethnic differences. (S Department of Health and Human Services. Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Black and Minority Health. 1985. https://collections.nlm.nih.gov/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-8602912-mvset). Whilst recent studies show reductions in racial and ethnic differences in self-reported health status and health care access and affordability, variances persist. During the COVID-19 pandemic it has become apparent that differences in progression to severe disease exist. In a cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform in England, including more than 17 million adults, some minority ethnic populations had increased risk of severe COVID-19 as compared with the White population, also after taking other factors of importance into account.

Specific aims When admitting patients to our ICUs, do clinicians discriminate against certain ethnicities? Are thresholds for admitting men lower than for women? The investigators hypothesize that differing ICU admission thresholds exist, due to non-medical reasons.

Method The investigators propose testing this hypothesis using a blinded randomized factorial survey study.

This survey will consist of multiple iterations of eight separate cases, describing a patient in the ward or in the emergency room that may need ICU admission. Co-morbid data, age, physiological parameters will be described followed by a YES/NO: would you admit this patient to your ICU, considering a "normal" ICU situation in your hospital. A count-down timer for each case will ensure that the YES/NO response comes quickly, and whilst a paper case can never mimic a real clinical situation, making fast decisions is a part of how intensivists work.

The factors affecting ICU admission are usually considered to be age, co-morbidities, physiological parameters (indicating severity of the acute illness) and, additionally, the number of available ICU beds. Factors that should not affect ICU admission include patient gender or ethnicity.

In order to test if gender and/or ethnicity affects ICU admission the survey will be randomized in several ways. Essentially, multiple different versions of the survey will exist. We will tweak the age and number of co-morbid conditions described. It is likely, but not certain, that higher patient age and more co-morbid conditions will be associated will lower admission rates. The same association is expected during a theoretical pandemic situation, with strained resources.

Unbeknown to the respondents, the cases will be randomized to describe a man or a woman. Thus, the cases can be in the order of Male, Female, M, F or reversed: F,M,F,M and so on. In one of the eight cases, the name of the patient will be a non-typical national name.

To make this generalizable and overall successful, the investigators think it is paramount to have the survey translated to French, German, Spanish and to make it simple to answer. Preferably the survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. Moreover, sending emails, through the national organizations, might improve generalizability. Using a survey link, for instance via twitter, could create a selection bias in who chooses to click on such a link.

(This research group has done this before, so it can be done. Luckily for this project, it is not a widely cited study. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50836-3 )

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 5000
• Est. completion date: June 2025
• Est. primary completion date: May 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

We will include intensive care physicians, both in training and specialists as responders in this randomized survey study

Exclusion Criteria:

We will exclude "button-mashers", i.e. participating respondents that toggle through the case descriptions faster than they possibly could read the case description. A case answered <20 seconds will be ruled out.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Critical Illness
• Discrimination, Racial

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Randomization to a different factors in the case descriptions
The case descriptions will include factors like age, co-morbid status and acute physiological parameters; but the factor of sex/gender will be randomized. Moreover, randomization to case description of typical vs non-typical national name will be done.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Karolinska Institutet

References & Publications (11)

Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL; AMA Manual of Style Committee. Updated Guidance on the Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals. JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):621-627. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13304. No abstract available. — View Citation

Fowler RA, Sabur N, Li P, Juurlink DN, Pinto R, Hladunewich MA, Adhikari NK, Sibbald WJ, Martin CM. Sex-and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care. CMAJ. 2007 Dec 4;177(12):1513-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071112. Epub 2007 Nov 14. — View Citation

Knoferl MW, Angele MK, Diodato MD, Schwacha MG, Ayala A, Cioffi WG, Bland KI, Chaudry IH. Female sex hormones regulate macrophage function after trauma-hemorrhage and prevent increased death rate from subsequent sepsis. Ann Surg. 2002 Jan;235(1):105-12. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00014. — View Citation

Mahajan S, Caraballo C, Lu Y, Valero-Elizondo J, Massey D, Annapureddy AR, Roy B, Riley C, Murugiah K, Onuma O, Nunez-Smith M, Forman HP, Nasir K, Herrin J, Krumholz HM. Trends in Differences in Health Status and Health Care Access and Affordability by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 1999-2018. JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):637-648. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.9907. — View Citation

Mahmood K, Eldeirawi K, Wahidi MM. Association of gender with outcomes in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2012 May 22;16(3):R92. doi: 10.1186/cc11355. — View Citation

Mathur R, Rentsch CT, Morton CE, Hulme WJ, Schultze A, MacKenna B, Eggo RM, Bhaskaran K, Wong AYS, Williamson EJ, Forbes H, Wing K, McDonald HI, Bates C, Bacon S, Walker AJ, Evans D, Inglesby P, Mehrkar A, Curtis HJ, DeVito NJ, Croker R, Drysdale H, Cockburn J, Parry J, Hester F, Harper S, Douglas IJ, Tomlinson L, Evans SJW, Grieve R, Harrison D, Rowan K, Khunti K, Chaturvedi N, Smeeth L, Goldacre B; OpenSAFELY Collaborative. Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death in 17 million adults in England: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform. Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1711-1724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00634-6. Epub 2021 Apr 30. Erratum In: Lancet. 2021 May 6;: — View Citation

Mizushima Y, Wang P, Jarrar D, Cioffi WG, Bland KI, Chaudry IH. Estradiol administration after trauma-hemorrhage improves cardiovascular and hepatocellular functions in male animals. Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):673-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00009. — View Citation

Samuelsson C, Sjoberg F, Karlstrom G, Nolin T, Walther SM. Gender differences in outcome and use of resources do exist in Swedish intensive care, but to no advantage for women of premenopausal age. Crit Care. 2015 Mar 30;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0873-1. — View Citation

Sunden-Cullberg J, Nilsson A, Inghammar M. Sex-based differences in ED management of critically ill patients with sepsis: a nationwide cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):727-736. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05910-9. Epub 2020 Jan 23. — View Citation

Valentin A, Jordan B, Lang T, Hiesmayr M, Metnitz PG. Gender-related differences in intensive care: a multiple-center cohort study of therapeutic interventions and outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul;31(7):1901-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000069347.78151.50. — View Citation

Zettersten E, Jaderling G, Bell M, Larsson E. Sex and gender aspects on intensive care. A cohort study. J Crit Care. 2020 Feb;55:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.023. Epub 2019 Oct 25. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Ratio of ICU admission men vs women	Exact same case descriptions except for the fact that the sex/gender is randomized	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Primary	Ratio of ICU admission ethnic background	Exact same case descriptions except for the fact that the name/ethnic background is randomized	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Time to ICU admission men vs women	Do respondents take longer to decide to admit women compared to men?	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Time to ICU admission ethnic background	Do respondents take longer to decide to admit descriptions of patients with "other" ethnic background compared to "normal" ethnic background?	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Time-out sex/gender	Do respondents more often run out of time in thinking about admitting women compared to men?	Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary	Time-out described ethnicity	Do respondents more often run out of time in thinking about admitting descriptions of patients with "other" ethnic background compared to "normal" ethnic background?	Through study completion, an average of 1 year