Infusion Set Replacement Intervals for Critically Ill Patients

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 24-hour versus 96-hour infusion set replacement to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in critically ill adults with central venous access devices.

Clinical Trial Description

Up to 70% of patients in acute care hospitals need a central venous access, and the latter is also widely used in other clinical settings. However, the central venous access usually remains associated with increased infection risks, which can be severe and even lethal. Most contemporary guidelines recommend infusion set replacement every 4 days with the CDC in US recommending replacement "no more frequently than 96 hours, but at least every 7 days". However, the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China recommend infusion set replacement every 24 hours in 2021. The previous evidence from neonate were in favor of the administration set changes of every 24 hours, compared with the longer time interval. However, it is unclear whether this conclusion applied to adult critically ill patients in ICU. The purpose of the current study is therefore to compare the effectiveness of 24-hour versus 96-hours infusion set replacement to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in critically ill adults with central venous access devices. This study is a multicenter, single-blind randomized clinical trial designed to investigate the efficacy of the 24-hour versus 96-hours infusion set replacement to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in critically ill adults with central venous access devices. The trial will enroll up to 1240 participant. The primary endpoint for this trial is the CLABSI rate. Mortality rate is a key secondary endpoint for the trial. Specific Aims 1. To demonstrate the efficacy of 24-hour infusion set replacement to reduce the rate of CLABSI, compared with 96-hours infusion set replacement. 2. To demonstrate the efficacy of 24-hour infusion set replacement to reduce the rate of CRBSI, all-cause bloodstream infection, and mortality, compared with 96-hours infusion set replacement. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Critical Illness

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05359601
Study type	Interventional
Source	Zhongnan Hospital
Contact	Bo Hu, MD
Phone	+86-18062603223
Email	hobbier1979@163.com
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	May 15, 2022
Completion date	June 30, 2026

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04551508` - Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study
Recruiting	`NCT06037928` - Plasma Sodium and Sodium Administration in the ICU
Completed	`NCT03671447` - Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care (ERIC)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03941002` - Continuous Evaluation of Diaphragm Function	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04674657` - Does Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Alter Antiinfectives Therapy Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients
Completed	`NCT04239209` - Effect of Intensivist Communication on Surrogate Prognosis Interpretation	N/A
Completed	`NCT05531305` - Longitudinal Changes in Muscle Mass After Intensive Care	N/A
Terminated	`NCT03335124` - The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02916004` - The Use of Nociception Flexion Reflex and Pupillary Dilatation Reflex in ICU Patients.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05883137` - High-flow Nasal Oxygenation for Apnoeic Oxygenation During Intubation of the Critically Ill
Completed	`NCT04479254` - The Impact of IC-Guided Feeding Protocol on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients (The IC-Study)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04475666` - Replacing Protein Via Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04516395` - Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04538469` - Absent Visitors: The Wider Implications of COVID-19 on Non-COVID Cardiothoracic ICU Patients, Relatives and Staff
Withdrawn	`NCT04043091` - Coronary Angiography in Critically Ill Patients With Type II Myocardial Infarction	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02989051` - Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry	Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT02922998` - CD64 and Antibiotics in Human Sepsis	N/A
Completed	`NCT02899208` - Can an Actigraph be Used to Predict Physical Function in Intensive Care Patients?	N/A
Completed	`NCT03048487` - Protein Consumption in Critically Ill Patients
Recruiting	`NCT02163109` - Oxygen Consumption in Critical Illness

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.