Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02881814
Other study ID # US-ADEPT
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 2, 2017
Est. completion date April 14, 2024

Study information

Verified date September 2023
Source Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Introduction: Physiotherapist usually uses a clinical examination, including auscultation, an analysis of blood gasses and chest imaging to determine the indication for chest physiotherapy, to choose the treatment protocol and evaluate the efficacy of the management. Lung ultrasound (LUS) presents greater accuracy than chest X-ray in the diagnosis of lung deficiencies interesting the physiotherapist. So, it could allow the physiotherapist to determine the indication for chest physiotherapy and thus avoid unnecessary or inappropriate treatments. No study has evaluated the impact of LUS on clinical decisions in chest physiotherapy in ICU patients. Objective: To evaluate the impact of using the results of lung and diaphragm US on clinical decisions in chest physiotherapy in hypoxemic patients hospitalized in ICU. Method: The physiotherapist carries out a clinical examination and analyses the complementary tests (chest X-ray, chest CT-scan and blood gasses if available). Following the examination, he will put forward one or several hypotheses concerning the respiratory deficiency and will confirm or not the indication for chest physiotherapy. If respiratory physiotherapy is indicated, the physiotherapist will specify the protocol. A lung and diaphragm US will be done following the evaluation of the clinical physiotherapist, and will make it possible to answer the question: are the results of the lung and diaphragm US compatible with the hypotheses put forward? The LUS report will be given to the clinical physiotherapist. He will specify the respiratory physiotherapy protocol according to the results of the US-scan. The modification of the clinical decision will be assessed with the Net Reclassification Index (NRI). Expected results: We expect that decisions for chest physiotherapy will be modified by LUS. The expected benefit for patients is therefore that they will be given a chest physiotherapy protocol that is better suited to the type of respiratory deficiency they are suffering from.


Description:

Research hypothesis The lung and diaphragm ultrasound findings provided to the physiotherapist will modify his/her clinical decision-making in regards to chest physiotherapy treatment in the critical care patient. Objectives Principal objective The principal objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of using the results of lung and diaphragm US on clinical decisions by physiotherapists regarding chest physiotherapy in patients hospitalized in an ICU. Secondary objectives 1. Determine the accuracy of physiotherapist diagnosis of lung pathology using routine clinical assessment versus LUS findings; 2. Determine the frequency of change in chest physiotherapy treatment with the addition of LUS results to clinical assessment; 3. Determine the frequency of change in medical treatment (determined by intensivist) following the addition of LUS results to clinical assessment findings. 4. Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in predicting duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality. Methodology: Type of study This is a multi-centre prospective (patients enrolled on admission) interventional study evaluating a routine assessment/treatment. The study intends to assess the impact of lung and diaphragm ultrasound on the usual physiotherapist's clinical decision-making process. Each included patient will be clinically assessed by a clinical physiotherapist, and then will have a lung and diaphragm ultrasound by another physiotherapist/operator blinded to the clinical assessment findings. The lung and diaphragm ultrasound findings will then be presented to both the intensivist and clinical physiotherapist to evaluate the impact on the independent clinical decision-making by both the intensivist and physiotherapist. Data collections The following data will be collected: - Demographic: age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, history of cirrhosis, diabetes or a chronic respiratory disease, heart failure; - Reason for hospitalization, medical diagnosis if different; - Treatments: hypnotics, opiates, steroids and anti-hypertensives, oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, NIV, tracheotomy; - Duration of mechanical ventilation - Duration of ICU stay - Vital signs: RR, HR, PA, SpO2, RASS, Glasgow; - Clinical hypotheses of the clinical physiotherapist; - LUS findings; - Choice of chest physiotherapy protocol (before and after ultrasonography). Nature of the routine care to be evaluated Procedure 1: Decision-making process in chest physiotherapy The clinical physiotherapist is the physiotherapist who manages patients in the CCU. As soon as chest physiotherapy is prescribed, the physiotherapist carries out a clinical examination and analyses the complementary tests (chest X-ray, chest CT-scan and blood gasses if available). He/she also consults the patient's medical record to find out the reason for admission to the CCU and the medical diagnosis if the critical care physician has made one. Following the examination, he/she will put forward one or several hypotheses concerning the respiratory deficiency (and not the disease - medical diagnosis) and will confirm or not the indication for chest physiotherapy. If respiratory physiotherapy is indicated, the physiotherapist will specify the protocol. A lung and diaphragm US will be done (see below) following the evaluation of the clinical physiotherapist, and will make it possible to answer the question: are the results of the lung and diaphragm US compatible with the hypotheses put forward? The LUS report will be given to the clinical physiotherapist. It will specify the respiratory physiotherapy protocol according to the results of the US-scan. Procedure 2: lung and diaphragm US The LUS will be performed by the physiotherapist/operator, who will be blinded to the clinical evaluation of the clinical physiotherapist and the patient's status. The operator will not take part in the management of the patients concerned. The semiology of lung and diaphragm US is described. The following syndromes will be searched for: normal profile, alveolar-interstitial syndrome, pulmonary consolidation, pleural effusion, pneumothorax and diaphragm dysfunction. The physiotherapist/operator will write a detailed LUS-scan report, which will be given to the clinical physiotherapist. It will include the LUS diagnosis and describe the signs observed in the different regions of the chest. The clinical physiotherapist is trained to interpret LUS reports. In case of mechanically ventilated patient at St. Vincent Hospital (Sydney, Australia), LUS scan will be performed immediately following intubation. Additionnal LUS scans will be performed 72h after intubation and Immediately prior to or following extubation. Number of patients to recruit and duration of participation for each patient Given the high prevalence of hypoxemia in ICUs, the systematic respiratory assessment in these patients by the physiotherapist and our relatively non-restrictive inclusion criteria, we believe we can recruit more than 300 patients per year.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 153
Est. completion date April 14, 2024
Est. primary completion date November 18, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion criteria - Hypoxemia(SpO2/FiO2< 315 (15))(indication for chest physiotherapy)(cf. annexe 1); - Medical prescription for chest physiotherapy; - First session of chest physiotherapy; - Chest X-ray<12h available; - Physiotherapist/operator qualified in LUS available; - Patient's consent. Exclusion criteria - Presence of a contra-indication for chest physiotherapy; - Absence of hypoxemia; - Absence of a prescription for chest physiotherapy; - Absence of a chest X-ray < 12h from the time of physiotherapy assessment; - Physiotherapist/operator qualified in LUS not available; - Lung and diaphragm US not possible (surgical emphysema, dressing, scarring, drains etc.); - Refusal of the patient or a relative to participate in the study; - Patients to be discharged on the day of the study; - Patients in palliative care; - Withdrawal/limitations of medical care with impending death.

Study Design


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Lung and diaphragm ultrasound
The ultrasound physiotherapist/operator performs a lung and diaphragm ultrasound. He is blinded to the patient's status and clinical physiotherapist examination. He/she is not involved in patient management or patient clinical decision-making. The ultrasound findings are recorded in the LUS report. The LUS report is reported to the clinical physiotherapist and to the intensivist. The ultrasound diagnosis(es) is recorded.
Lung and diaphragm ultrasound in MV patients
In case of mechanically ventilated patient at St. Vincent Hospital (Sydney, Australia), LUS scan will be performed immediately following intubation. Additionnal LUS scans will be performed 72h after intubation and Immediately prior to or following extubation.

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia St Vincent's Hospital Sydney
France CHU de Dijon Dijon
France Hôpital Forcilles Férolles-Attilly
France Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph Paris Ile-de-France

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, Hopital Forcilles, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Australia,  France, 

References & Publications (3)

Le Neindre A, Mongodi S, Philippart F, Bouhemad B. Thoracic ultrasound: Potential new tool for physiotherapists in respiratory management. A narrative review. J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 26. — View Citation

Leech M, Bissett B, Kot M, Ntoumenopoulos G. Lung ultrasound for critical care physiotherapists: a narrative review. Physiother Res Int. 2015 Jun;20(2):69-76. doi: 10.1002/pri.1607. Epub 2014 Dec 29. — View Citation

Xirouchaki N, Georgopoulos D. Impact of lung ultrasound on clinical decision making in critically ill patients: response to O'Connor et al. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul;40(7):1063. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3316-6. Epub 2014 May 6. No abstract available. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Net Reclassification Index (NRI) Agreement (yes/no) between the lung and diaphragm US diagnosis and the clinical diagnosis and modification (yes/no) of the chest physiotherapy protocol Hour 1
Secondary Prediction of duration of mechanical ventilation Number of days with mechanical ventialtion Final study visit
Secondary Prediction of mortality Vital status at the end of ICU hospitalization Final study visit
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04551508 - Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study
Recruiting NCT06037928 - Plasma Sodium and Sodium Administration in the ICU
Completed NCT03671447 - Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care (ERIC) N/A
Recruiting NCT03941002 - Continuous Evaluation of Diaphragm Function N/A
Recruiting NCT04674657 - Does Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Alter Antiinfectives Therapy Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients
Completed NCT04239209 - Effect of Intensivist Communication on Surrogate Prognosis Interpretation N/A
Completed NCT05531305 - Longitudinal Changes in Muscle Mass After Intensive Care N/A
Terminated NCT03335124 - The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Phase 4
Completed NCT02916004 - The Use of Nociception Flexion Reflex and Pupillary Dilatation Reflex in ICU Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05883137 - High-flow Nasal Oxygenation for Apnoeic Oxygenation During Intubation of the Critically Ill
Completed NCT04479254 - The Impact of IC-Guided Feeding Protocol on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients (The IC-Study) N/A
Recruiting NCT04475666 - Replacing Protein Via Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04516395 - Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04538469 - Absent Visitors: The Wider Implications of COVID-19 on Non-COVID Cardiothoracic ICU Patients, Relatives and Staff
Withdrawn NCT04043091 - Coronary Angiography in Critically Ill Patients With Type II Myocardial Infarction N/A
Recruiting NCT02989051 - Fluid Restriction Keeps Children Dry Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT02922998 - CD64 and Antibiotics in Human Sepsis N/A
Completed NCT02899208 - Can an Actigraph be Used to Predict Physical Function in Intensive Care Patients? N/A
Completed NCT03048487 - Protein Consumption in Critically Ill Patients
Recruiting NCT02163109 - Oxygen Consumption in Critical Illness