There are about 10560 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Taiwan. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The primary purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of durvalumab and tremelimumab with platinum-pemetrexed in patients with metastatic NSCLC (T790+ve or T790M-ve) following progression on EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.. Study population: Individuals may be eligible to enrol in this trial if aged 18 or over and have been diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (T790+ve or T790M-ve) following progression on EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Study details: All participants enrolled in this trial will begin with induction therapy which involves 4 cycles of durvalumab 1500mg and tremelimumab 75mg with cisplatin 75mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5, and pemetrexed 500mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Participants will then move into a maintenance phase of durvalumab 1500mg and pemetrexed 500mg/m2 once every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable side effects. All patients will be reviewed every three to four weeks by blood samples, CT scans and side effect assessments. It is hoped that the findings from this trial will provide information on whether treatment with durvalumab and tremelimumab with platinum-pemetrexed is feasible, safe and effective for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (T790+ve or T790M-ve).
This proposal will investigate the wound condition between different drainage methods of the stoma closure wound. Anastomotic leakage is a major complication after colorectal surgery. The protective stoma will decrease the anastomosis leakage rate and severity1. Stoma closure is often performed after the condition of the previous protecting site improved. Wound infection is not a rare complication after stoma closure, with a reported infectious rate from 3% to 43%. Wound infection will result in wound dehiscence, incisional herniation, ileus and the length of hospital stay. Lots of the stoma wound closure technique have been developed, including subcutaneous antibiotic material implantation, wound irrigation with iodine, closure wound with a drain tube, secondary closure, delayed primary closure and pursestring closure. But there still is in a debate about the best skin closure test. In Division of Colorectal Surgery Shuang Ho Hospital, two current stoma wound closure methods were subcutaneous Jackson-Pratt drainage and cutaneous Penrose drainage insertion. In the project, clinical outcomes of these two drainage methods will be compared. The subcutaneous. Jackson-Pratt drainage is used to create negative pressure in subcutaneous closure wound. The negative pressure will extract actively the tissue debris and fluid, avoiding the seroma and pus accumulation. The cutaneous Penrose drainage is used to create delayed skin healing, and the tissue debris and fluid will drainage passive by capillary phenomenon. Two groups will be distributed randomly. The demographic characters like age, gender, BMI, nutritional status, under chemotherapy, diabetes and past medication history will be reviewed. Perioperative clinical data like the method of the anastomosis, operation time, postoperative hospital day, surgical site infection, prolonged ileus, anastomosis leakage, and incisional hernia will be collected. From this study, these two stoma wound closure methods will be evaluated and analyze the risk factors of complication for the stoma wound closure.
This study will be comprised of 2 parts: Part 1 (dose escalation) will be conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of 2 doses (100 milligrams/kilogram [mg/kg] and 200 mg/kg) of eteplirsen in approximately 10 participants with DMD; Part 2 (dose finding and dose comparison) will be conducted for the selection of a high dose (100 mg/kg versus 200 mg/kg) and its comparison with the 30 mg/kg dose of eteplirsen, in approximately 144 participants with genetically confirmed deletion mutations amenable to treatment by skipping exon 51.
Primary Objective: To characterize the patients who receive Dupixent® (dupilumab) for AD in a real-world setting, with respect to their medical history, socio-demographic and disease characteristics, and prior and concomitant treatments of AD Secondary Objectives: - To characterize real-world use patterns of Dupixent® for AD (eg, used regimens, reason for initiation of new treatments, concomitant therapies, treatment durations and reasons for discontinuation and/or switching) - To assess the long-term effectiveness of Dupixent® in AD patients in a real-world setting - To assess comorbid atopic conditions and effects of treatment in comorbid atopic conditions in patients who receive Dupixent® for AD - To collect safety data on study participants
The current study will compare pembrolizumab (MK-3475) plus maintenance olaparib, vs. pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo for the treatment of squamous NSCLC. The study's 2 primary hypotheses are: 1. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent clinical review (BICR). 2. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib placebo with respect to overall survival (OS). As of Amendment 07, there will be no further analyses for OS and patient-reported outcome assessments.
The current study will compare pembrolizumab (MK-3475) plus maintenance olaparib, vs pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed for the treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC. The study's 2 primary hypotheses are: 1. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent clinical review (BICR) and 2. Pembrolizumab plus maintenance olaparib is superior to pembrolizumab plus maintenance pemetrexed with respect to overall survival (OS).
This study will treat patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR or HER2 mutation who have progressed following prior therapy. This is the first time this drug is tested in patients, and so it will help to understand what type of side effects may occur with the drug treatment. It will also measure the levels of drug in the body and preliminarily assess its anti-cancer activity as monotherapy.
The goal of this clinical study is to learn more about the study drug, sacituzumab govitecan-hziy, in participants with metastatic (cancer that has spread) solid tumors.
The reason for this study is to see if the study drug called baricitinib works and is safe in children and teenage participants with atopic dermatitis.
A phase 3, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled, multi-center study comparing TJ202, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received at least 1 prior line of treatment