Clinical Trials Logo

Cortical Atrophy clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Cortical Atrophy.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04794634 Completed - Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trials

Relationship Between Alzheimer Disease and Diminution of the Three Macular Nervous Retinal Layers

RETEVAL
Start date: March 9, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Alzheimer disease is hard, long and expensive to diagnose. In order to help the clinician, a new biomarker in Alzheimer disease seems to be very useful. The retina, as a window of the brain, could offer a new way to diagnose this common disease. Indeed, a retinal atrophy could especially appear in Alzheimer disease. Besides, many aspects about retinal alteration, visual function and their link with the disease deserve to be more explored. So as to fill these gaps, a new study about retinal specificity in Alzheimer disease appears to be relevant.

NCT ID: NCT04614792 Completed - Clinical trials for Disorder of Consciousness

Excitatory Prefrontal Weak Current Stimulation in Vegetative Patients

VEG-TDCS
Start date: April 30, 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In response to "conscious" EEG findings related to detectable cognitive function that reliably denote awareness in vegetative state patients, in the current study, we will assess the covert conscious EEG activity (as well as standard clinical overt measures) and neuroplasctic propensity (i.e., changes in EEG spectral power synchronization values following tDCS intervention) in vegetative-state patients receiving repetitive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) treatment over frontal motor areas for a period of two weeks. In support of this approach, a recent tDCS study with vegetative and minimally conscious patients implied that a twenty minutes anodal stimulation (i.e., excitatory stimulation) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) significantly increased CRS-R scores versus sham (placebo: non-active stimulation) stimulation condition. It was noted that this tDCS effect was more pronounced in minimally conscious state patients versus vegetative state patients excluding effects of chronicity or etiology. Thus, the investigators in this study suggested that tDCS could be effective in improving cognitive recovery in severely brain-injured patients. However, their findings would benefit neural activation correlates that could support their conclusion regarding the effectiveness of this type of non-invasive intervention in promoting neurocognitive recovery. Most importantly, tDCS is safe for use in humans, has no adverse effects, is considered the most non-invasive transcranial stimulation method because it uses extremely weak currents (0.5 to 2 mA), and, is known to only temporarily shift the neuron's membrane potential towards excitation/inhibition. In regard to the method's potential to induce functional recovery in vegetative state patients, recent clinical studies indicate that tDCS could counteract the negative effects of brain damage by influencing neurophysiological mechanisms, and is likely to contribute to the "formation of functionally meaningful connections and the maintenance of existing pathways" .