Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dermalax(Deep) in Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Correction of Nasolabial Folds Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Randomized, Multi-center, Patient & Evaluator-blind, Matched Pairs, Active-controlled Design Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With Dermalax(Deep) as Compared to Restylane® in Correction of Nasolabial Fold

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02179619
• Other study ID #: HG-HADNSF-12103
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: June 30, 2014
• Last updated: June 30, 2014
• Start date: December 2012
• Est. completion date: February 2014

Study information

• Verified date: June 2014
• Source: Across Co.,Ltd.
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Korea: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study is to verify that Dermalax (Deep) is not inferior to the reference device, Restylane®, in terms of efficacy and safety in the correction of nasolabial folds. Subjects who voluntarily signed the informed consent and are judged to be eligible for this study will be intradermally injected both of study device and comparator device. Subjects will be randomized to receive injection of study device and comparator device on their each nasolabial fold. Efficacy is evaluated based on the change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) from baseline. Safety will be assessed based on 24 weeks follow up visits and subject diary which will be given to subjects during the first 2 weeks after the injection. Any uncomfortable things and adverse events will be investigated from subject diary and follow up visits.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 66
• Est. completion date: February 2014
• Est. primary completion date: January 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 30 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male or female subjects no younger than 30 and no more than 65 years of age.

2. Subjects who scored 3 or 4 on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) and want to improve the appearance of their nasolabial folds (the subject does not need to have the same score on both sides.*)

*The scores need not to be same on both sides, but the two nasolabial folds should have symmetry in the range of 3-4.

3. Subjects who have symmetric nasolabial folds.

4. Subjects who agreed to discontinue the use of any dermatological procedure or therapy, including facial wrinkle reduction procedures.

5. Subjects with the ability to understand and follow the instructions and who are committed to availability for the entire study period.

6. Subjects who have voluntarily decided to participate in this study and who have signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects who show hypersensitive skin reaction to the investigational devices, confirmed by the intradermal reaction test performed at screening.

2. Subjects who received an antithrombotic agent within 2 weeks prior to screening (with the exception of low dose Aspirin 100 mg, maximum of 300 mg/day) or NSAIDs or Vitamin E within 1 week.

3. Subjects with a liver problem and/or blood coagulation defect or subjects who require the administration of an antithrombotic agent during the clinical trial period (with the exception of low dose Aspirin 100 mg, maximum of 300 mg/day).

4. Subjects who have used a local ointment on their faces (medication such as steroid or retinoid are included and cosmetic products are excluded from this criterion) within 4 weeks prior to screening or subjects who are planning on using such an ointment during the clinical trial period.

5. Subjects who have received treatment for wrinkles or acne within 24 weeks prior to screening.

6. Subjects who have received facial (chemical) peels and/or skin rejuvenation procedures or plastic surgeries, including the injection of the Botulinum toxin, within 24 weeks prior to screening.

7. Subjects who have a permanent skin expander such as soft form or silicon implanted in the face.

8. Subjects who have scars on the face requiring a medical treatment but who have not received any treatment for more than a year or subjects who have scars or wounds on which the test investigational devices will be applied.

9. Subjects with skin disease or wound infection on the face.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Intervention

Device:
• Dermalax(Deep)
Dermalax(Deep) injection into one nasolabial fold (NLF) of one side of the face (blinded, split-face study design) in the Initial Treatment period
• Restylane
Restylane Injection into one nasolabial fold (NLF) of one side of the face (blinded, split-face study design) in the Initial Treatment period

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Korea, Republic of	Chung-ang University Hospital	Seoul
Korea, Republic of	Eulji General Hospital	Seoul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Across Co.,Ltd.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale(WSRS) evaluation	Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale(WSRS) evaluation at week 24	at week 24	No
Secondary	The mean of the WSRS scores from both the Dermalax (Deep) group and the Restylane® group	Wrinkle severity system scale(WSRS) evaluation at week8, week 16, week 36, week 48 by independent evaluator	at week 8~ 48	No
Secondary	The mean of the WSRS scores from both the Dermalax (Deep) group and the Restylane® group	Wrinkle severity system scale(WSRS) evaluation at week8, week 16, week 24, week 36, week 48 by investigator	at week 8~ 48	No
Secondary	The mean of the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) scores from both the Dermalax (Deep) group and the Restylane® group	Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) evaluation at week8, week 16, week 36, week 48 by investigator	at week 8~48	No
Secondary	Mean of the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) scores from both the Dermalax (Deep) group and the Restylane® group	Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale(GAIS) scores evaluation at week 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 by subjects	at week 8~48	No
Secondary	The proportion of subjects whose WSRS scores decreased at least 1 level	the proportion of subjects whose Wrinkle severity system scale(WSRS) scores decreased at least 1 level at week 24, 36, 48 by independent evaluator.	at week 0~48	No
Secondary	The proportion of subjects whose WSRS scores decreased at least 1 level	the proportion of subjects whose Wrinkle severity system scale(WSRS) scores decreased at least 1 level at week 24, 36, 48 by investigator	at week 0~48	No