View clinical trials related to Coronary Restenosis.
Filter by:The registry aims to evaluate the safety, performance and efficacy of the Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) system in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions in all-day clinical practice.
The purpose of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of the Danubio Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon for the treatment of In-Stent Restenosis lesions in native coronary arteries.
The LATINA registry aims at assessing a new classification of bifurcation restenosis in the prediction of major adverse cardiac events in patients who have previously undergone a succesful percutaneous bifurcation intervention.
The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity but there are further demands on DES performance. Such demands are an optimized performance in very challenging coronary lesions; third generation DES were developed in an effort to further improve DES performance in such challenging lesions. Two CE-certified third generation DES (Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents) are currently available; there are no data that indicate an advantage of one of these DES over the other.
The purpose of this two part study is the assessment of the performance of the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS) in the treatment of the specific setting of patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease (MVD).
Intra-coronary stents deployment reduces the rate of angiographic restenosis as compared to Balloon angioplasty. in-stent restenosis, usually defined as ≥50 percent diameter stenosis within previously deployed stent, is most often becoming clinically evident within the first 6 to 12 months after the stent was deployed. Several risk factors are predictors for the development of in-stent restenosis. These can be generally calcified as either clinical, angiographic or procedural related factors. However it is difficult to estimate to what extent In stent re-stenosis is influenced by these various components. Drug eluting stent, as compared to bare metal stents, markedly reduced the incidence of angiographic in-stent restenosis. However this benefit must be weighed against a suggested increased risk of late and very late stent thrombosis, a catastrophic event often leading to myocardial infarction and death. Often in patients with existing risk factors for in-stent restenosis, drug eluting stents will be deployed even in cases where patency of a previously deployed bare metal stent have been demonstrated. Therefore the researchers sought to investigate whether in patients with previously deployed bare metal stent and no evidence of in-stent re-stenosis there will be a significant difference in the rates of in-stent between drug eluting stents and bare metal stents deployed within de-novo stenotic lesions.
All subjects requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenting are eligible to participate in the study. Restudy coronary angiogram with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) would be performed between 1 to 5 months at the time of a staged PCI procedure (for remaining coronary disease) or as clinically indicated, and then at 9 months. At the time of the 9-month restudy (a proper time window for drug eluting stent to develop into restenosis should it occur), any new disease detected or restenosis will be treated. The reported incidence of drug eluting stent restenosis is around 10% in simple lesions and is expected to be higher in diabetic patients, long lesions and multi-vessel diseases; a restudy at 9 months actually confers better protection to the patients with advanced disease and any restenosis can be treated timely. All data on clinical events and progress will be monitored and regular follow-ups will be carried out.
The main study objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of different bindarit dosages compared to placebo in preventing restenosis, in patients submitted to coronary stenting and using a bare metal stent (Vision BMS, by Abbott).
To evaluate the safety of a new bioresorbable (non-permanent) stent platform in native coronary arteries.
This is a prospective, observational, single-arm, open-label, multicenter, postapproval registry study in China. The purpose of this study is to: - Evaluate the continued safety and effectiveness of the XIENCE V EECSS in a cohort of real-world patients receiving the XIENCE V EECSS during commercial use - Evaluate patient compliance to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)