View clinical trials related to Coronary Restenosis.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to compare angiographic outcomes following revascularization using drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus 2nd generation drug-eluting stent (DES) in treatment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Restenosis.
To define the long-term incidence and frequency of ISR follow DES implantation. Compare the clinical presentation, treatment and intervention success among de novo coronary artery stenosis and DES ISR. Compare short- and long-term outcomes of de novo coronary artery stenosis and DES ISR, assessed by incidence of mortality, MACE, MI, and TLR/TVR at index hospitalization, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, if available.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Paclitaxel drug eluting balloons (RESTORE DEB, 3μg/mm2 balloon surface area ) for success of intervention treatment and maintaining the vessels unobstructed in the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis compared with a product of the same category (SeQuent® Please).
The aim of the study is to choose an optimal stent and to get further knowledge about the mechanisms of the engraftment of a stent. The occurrence of a hyperplasia of neointima can be minimized by application of a coated stent and a concurrent safety four weekly dual thrombocytes therapy
The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity. However, the first generation of these devices had no positive impact on the mortality after PCI (compared to bare metal stents), which was greatly attributed to a somewhat increased incidence of late and very late stent thrombosis. Concerns about the role of durable polymers as a potential trigger of inflammation and finally adverse events also led to the development of DES with bioresorbable coatings, which leave after degradation of the coating only a bare metal stent in the vessel wall that does not induce an inflammatory response. While such bioresorbable polymer DES are increasingly used in clinical practice, data from head-to-head comparisons between bioresorbable polymer DES with a contemporary highly flexible new generation permanent polymer coated DES.
AbsorbISR is a randomized, controlled trial, single center, prospective, not blinded to evaluate two strategies of in stent restenosis treatment: Implantation of drug eluting bioresorbable stent scaffold Absorb® vs. balloon angioplasty with drug eluting balloon Sequent Please®.
Hypothesis: Angioplasty with a novel paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB; Agent, Boston Scientific) with citrate-based excipient will be non-inferior to conventional paclitaxel-coated balloon with iopromide excipient (PCB) for the treatment of coronary restenosis after implantation of limus-analogue drug-eluting stents (DES)
Use of SeQuent® Please drug coated balloon (DCB) is effective to treat patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, whether the type of pre-dilatation balloon prior to DCB dilatation impacts on clinical and angiographic outcomes or not is unknown. Lacrosse® Non-slip element balloon (NSE) is a balloon catheter with 3 longitudinal plastic elements which are attached to proximal and distal balloon edges. NSE is developed to incise neointimal tissue and avoid balloon slippage without vitiating balloon derivability and crossability. We investigated angiographic and clinical outcomes following normal non-compliant balloon or NSE dilatation prior to DCB dilatation in ISR lesions.This study is a single blinded, multicenter, randomized trial. Total 200 patients with ISR are randomly assigned to treat with non-compliant balloon or NSE before DCB dilatation. Optical coherence tomographic (OCT) analysis are performed before pre-dilatation and after DCB dilatation Follow-up angiography analysis are planned at 8 months in all patients. Clinical follow-up is planned at 8 and 24 months.Primary endpoint is angiographic in-segment late loss at 8 months.
In this study, the safety and efficacy of COMBO TM stent beyond 36 months are assessed, in particular the occurrence of late stent thrombosis and late loss catch-up (restenosis).
Rationale: The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of coronary artery disease has led to a significant reduction in morbidity but there are further demands on DES performance. Such demands are an optimized performance in very challenging coronary lesions; third generation DES were developed in an effort to further improve DES performance in such challenging lesions. Two CE-certified third generation DES (Resolute Integrity and Promus Element stents) are currently available; there are no data that indicate an advantage of one of these DES over the other. Objective: To investigate whether the clinical outcome is similar after implantation of the Promus Element versus the Resolute Integrity stent (non-inferiority hypothesis). Study design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized single-blinded study. Study population: Patients who require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for the treatment of coronary stenoses with an indication for DES use, according to current guidelines and/or the operators clinical judgement. All clinical syndromes will be included. Intervention: In patients who are eligible for DES implantation, the type of DES implanted will be randomized (Resolute Integrity stent versus Promus Element stent). At the start of the study, both DES will also be used in routine clinical practice. Main study endpoints: The primary endpoint is the incidence of target vessel failure at one year follow-up. Target vessel failure (TVF) is a composite endpoint consisting of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization. Further secondary clinical and angiographic endpoints will be investigated, defined in accordance with suggestions of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC). Of note, the angiographic assessment is based on clinically indicated projections only and results in no additional x-ray exposure. There is no routine angiographic follow-up. If angiographic data are available in patients who undergo symptom-driven re-catheterization, we will analyze these data to get insight into the mechanisms of potential DES restenosis. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients will receive the routine clinical treatment. As a consequence, the risks of this trial do not exceed the risks of any routine PCI procedure.