Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02692222
Other study ID # B406201526827
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 10, 2016
Last updated December 6, 2016
Start date February 2016
Est. completion date December 2016

Study information

Verified date December 2016
Source Erasme University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, FAMHP
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This study test the agreement and accuracy of Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) and Cardiac Output (CO) obtained by the Android application Capstesia™ against the gold standard : PPV and CO calculated by thermodilution.


Description:

Pulse pressure variation (PPV) remains a good predictor of fluid responsiveness in the OR. However, PPV can be time-consuming to calculate (manual determination), is not always displayed on monitoring screens nor reliable through visual assessment and needs additional devices to be displayed. A new Android application (Captesia) automatically calculates the PPV utilizing a digital photograph of the arterial waveform from the monitor. The application determines the PPV by selecting peaks and troughs of the arterial curve.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 57
Est. completion date December 2016
Est. primary completion date December 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass

Exclusion Criteria:

- patients with arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation

- patients with valvular insufficiency

Study Design

Time Perspective: Prospective


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Calculation of PPV and CO with two methods


Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Erasme Hospital Bruxelles

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Erasme University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

References & Publications (2)

Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology. 2011 Aug;115(2):231-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225b80a. — View Citation

Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014 Nov 27;18(6):650. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0650-6. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary PPV the Pulse Pressure Variation will be calculated by the Android Application (Captesia) and by the Picco before and after a meneuver of volume expansion, which goal is to change the cardiac output. at time of surgery No
Secondary CO the Cardiac Output will be calculated by the Android Application (Captesia) and by thermodilution before and after of volume expansion, which goal is to change the cardiac output. at time of surgery No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03483285 - Comparison of Two Different Videolaryngoscopes Regarding Hemodynamic Parameters in Open Heart Surgey N/A