Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump Clinical Trial
— PCSMICSOfficial title:
Prospective Cohort Study on Mid-term Safety and Effectiveness of Minimal Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
CABG technology is recognized as the preferred treatment, and its major adverse cardiac and cerebral event(MACCE) incidence and mortality are lower than percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). However, the traditional CABG procedure requires sternal incision, large trauma and long recovery period after surgery. How to reduce trauma and treat multiple complex coronary lesions under minimally invasive conditions has become a hot spot. MIDCAB surgery can complete the coronary anastomosis only by a 6-8 cm incision in the left chest. It has been more than ten years since the first literature report in the world, however, due to the technical bottleneck, a unified and standardized surgical procedure has not yet been formed. Some centers are still in the exploratory stage, and internationally Large-scale studies of clinical outcomes (mostly less than 150 cases) have not been reported. Assessing the minimally invasive procedure's safety and effectiveness has become an urgent problem to be solved. At present, our center has completed nearly 200 cases of small incision multi-coronary coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The investigators evaluate the patency of the graft by the postoperative of angiography, the patency of grafts is more than 95%, and there is no statistical difference with conventional OPCABG. On the other hand, focus on the postoperative complications, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACCE and revascularization between the MIDCAB group and conventional surgery during hospitalization. The investigators assume that the early results of this procedure are safe and effective. MIDCAB has a congenital advantage because of its' reduction of the trauma of the thoracotomy and the aesthetics of the incision. Therefore, if a larger sample size study and mid-term follow-up results are obtained, and the conclusion prove that the safety of the small incision surgery and the patency of the grafts are not inferior to conventional surgery. The investigators can consider that minimal invasive coronary surgery(MICS) is a technique worth trying to promote. Through this prospective cohort study, the investigators evaluated the safety of MICS through mid-term follow-up results and asses the efficiency by the results of grafts patency (angiography or CT within 30 days after surgery) and medical outcomes study-short from scores(SF-36), establish the surgical standard and perioperative management method.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 400 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 25 Years to 85 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Patients are planned for undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Exclusion Criteria: 1. BMI greater than 28 2. trauma, surgical or radiotherapy history of left chest 3. EF less than 40% 4. Simultaneous other cardiac surgery or planned cardiopulmonary bypass 5. Preoperative critical situation: acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and other conditions require emergency surgery. Preoperative nitrate drugs are difficult to control angina and needs IABP implantation. 6. Respiratory function: severe hypoxemia (pO2 less than 60 mmHg without Oxygen inhalation), carbon dioxide retention (pCO2 > 50 mmHg), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (FEV1/forced vital capacity less than 70% and FEV1 less than 50%) 7. Aortic lesions: patients with ascending aorta calcification confirmed by preoperative CT 8. Peripheral vascular lesions:By the preoperative assessment with ultrasound or CT,LIMA and left subclavian artery stenosis>70% ,or bilateral femoral artery calcification, stenosis>50% 9. Drug therapy: Preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy (except aspirin and clopidogrel) 10. Others: Exclusion criteria and contraindications of CABG |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Peking University Third Hospital | Beijing | Beijing |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Peking University Third Hospital |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Number of Transfusion volume | Perioperative transfusion number(U) of red blood cell | Within 30 days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Other | mechanical ventilation time (hours) | Perioperative mechanical ventilation time | Within 30 days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Other | Rate of wound infection | wound infection performed as redness, exudation, cracking, delayed healing that need surgical suture | Within 90 days of the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Other | Rate of secondary surgery | All cause secondary surgery event such as bleeding, hemodynamic instability, sternum fracture or wound infection etc. | Within 30 days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Other | Rate of other complications | Renal failure?atrial fibrillation?postoperativeIABP implantation?postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO) implantation etc. | Within 30 days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Other | Rate of Perioperative mortality | all cause death no matter cardiogenic death or non-cardiogenic death | Within 30 days of the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Other | Rate of Mid-term mortality | all cause death no matter cardiogenic death or non-cardiogenic death | Within 12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Other | Rate of Revascularization | Receive PCI or Redo-CABG because of graft stenosis or occlusion | Within 12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Primary | Rate of 1 years graft occlusion rate | 12 months occlusion rate of graft(Evaluate by angiography of CT angiography ) | 12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Primary | 30 days PCS scores | PCS scores calculated from the SF-36 | 30days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Primary | 30 days mental health summary scales(MCS) of SF-36 scores | MCS scores calculated from the SF-36 | 30days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Secondary | Rate of 30 days graft occlusion rate | perioperative occlusion rate of graft(Evaluate by angiography of CT angiography ) | within 30days after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Secondary | MCS scores | MCS scores calculated from the SF-36 | 7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Secondary | PCS scores | PCS scores calculated from the SF-36 | 7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Secondary | Rate of Perioperative MACCE | Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events( Composite endpoint of Myocardial infarction, Stroke and death) | Within 30 days of the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery | |
Secondary | Rate of mid-term MACCE incidence | Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events( Composite endpoint of Myocardial infarction, Stroke and death) | 12 months after the MIDCAB or OPCABG surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06399627 -
Effect of Non-anemic Iron Deficiency on Outcome Following Off-pump Coronary Revascularization
|
||
Completed |
NCT03889730 -
Intraoperative Hypotension and Acute Kidney Injury After Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02046824 -
Cell Savers and Blood Quality
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03163693 -
The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on cTnI and GP-BB in Patients Undergoing OPCABG
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03629418 -
Targeted Blood-pressure Management and Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04795193 -
Efficacy and Safety of Minimal Invasive Coronary Surgery in Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Lesions
|
N/A |