View clinical trials related to Corneal Ulcer.
Filter by:To evaluate Safety and efficacy of topical insulin in treatment of neurotrophic corneal ulcers
Various treatment options have been proposed in managing NK such as preservative-free lubrication (PF-L), withdrawal of epitheliotoxic medication, prophylactic antibiotics, applying of bandage contact lenses, using hemoderivatives 8, topical insulin, recombinant nerve growth factor (rNGF) or epidermal growth factor (rEGF).11,12, amniotic membrane transplant (AMT), or corneal neurotization.2,4,9,10 Topical insulin has been reported to effectively promote the healing of persistent corneal epithelial defects. In our retrospective study, we explored the safety and efficacy of topical insulin, as a first-line treatment, in treatment-naïve acute NK after diabetic vitrectomy.
Microbial keratitis is a common and serious eye disease in Edinburgh. Prompt treatment with antibiotics can prevent sight loss, and identification of the micro-organism and its antibiotic sensitivities are key to appropriate management. Standard practice of collecting infected material from the cornea using a blade can be distressing and time-consuming. Corneal impression membranes (CIM) have recently been introduced to another National Health Service (NHS) eye unit (St Paul's Eye Unit, Liverpool) as they detect more micro-organisms and are more patient-friendly than corneal scrape. The aim of this study is to compare CIM with reference to current standard practice of corneal scrape. If CIM have greater sensitivity and fewer adverse events than scrape then the investigators will consider using CIM instead of scrape in routine clinical care. The investigators will also collect additional CIM to help develop new microbiological tests being developed at the University of Edinburgh, which if successful could be applied to CIM at the bedside to further improve the speed of diagnosis in the future. Development of the new microbiological tests is facilitated by having samples of germs from eye infections. Study design: cross-sectional study comparing diagnostic techniques Participants: recruited from the Acute referral clinic at the Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, or emergency on-call ophthalmology service What is involved: subjects with microbial keratitis will have standard investigations to identify the germ causing the infection. In addition the investigators will capture germs using CIM, and will compare CIM with the standard test to see which is better. Funding: departmental funding
A community-randomized trial comparing villages randomized to receive an intervention consisting of a trained community health volunteer who brings patients to the nearest Vision Centers or Primary Health Care Centers for treatment after diagnosing a corneal abrasion to control villages receiving no additional intervention. The primary outcome of corneal ulcer will be measured by baseline and annual population-based census performed in both intervention and control villages by masked examiners from baseline to 24 months. Each resident in the village will be asked about their ocular history and, if suspected of having a corneal ulcer, will be examined for evidence of a corneal opacity. Annual visits will occur, coinciding with the end of the harvest season. In villages randomized to intervention, an active promotion campaign will be undertaken to urge residents to notify the village eye health worker within 24 hours of ocular trauma. In control villages, abrasions and ulcers will be treated if they present to a clinic or are found during the annual monitoring visits, but active promotion of corneal abrasion care will not be offered.