Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01298661
Other study ID # TD6reprod
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received February 17, 2011
Last updated October 31, 2013
Start date February 2011
Est. completion date December 2012

Study information

Verified date September 2013
Source Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Brazil: Ethics Committee
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) leads to a reduction in exercise capacity that affects the quality of life and increases mortality of these patients. So, exercise tests are considered as an essential component of the clinical evaluation of the patients with COPD. The objective of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility sensitivity and validity of the Six Minute Step Test (6MST) in patients with COPD and in health volunteers, and verify its relation with the "Body-Mass Index, Airways Obstruction, Dyspnea and Exercise Capacity" Index (BODE). This Observational, Transversal, Prospective study will be conducted in the "Special Unit of Respiratory Physiotherapy", of the "Federal University of São Carlos". To participate in this study, 120 subjects, both gender, will be invited and will be allocated in five groups: Group I (30 healthy young subjects of 17 to 27 years old), Group II (30 healthy elderly individuals of 60 to 75 years old), and patients COPD, 60 to 80 years old, with mild, moderate, severe and very severe obstruction determined by the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) by forced vital capacity (FVC) relation "FEV1/FVC" <70% and FEV1 in predict percentage < 80% composing the Group III (20 COPD patients in GOLD stage I), Group IV (20 COPD patients in GOLD stage II) and Group V (20 patients COPD stages III and IV). All subjects will be submitted to body composition and anthropometric assessment, pulmonary function test, three 6-minutes walk test (6MWT) and three 6MST. Furthermore, the patients of the groups III, IV and V will answer the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale, and BODE index will be calculated to each of them.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 91
Est. completion date December 2012
Est. primary completion date December 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Young and elderly healthy subjects presented pulmonary function within the normal range, confirmed by spirometry

- Patients with clinical and spirometric diagnosis of COPD

Exclusion Criteria:

- Lung disease exacerbated

- Decompensated heart disease

- Rheumatic, neurological or orthopedic disease, preventing them from doing the tests by limiting the exercise

- Peripheral oxygen saturation < 80% without physical effort

- Subjects who does not complete the first day of evaluation

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Diagnostic


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Six-minute Step Test
The patients underwent a test where they need to step up and down a 20cm test during six minutes.

Locations

Country Name City State
Brazil Unidade Especial de Fisioterapia Respiratória São Carlos São Paulo

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

References & Publications (23)

ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7. — View Citation

Baarends EM, Schols AM, Mostert R, Wouters EF. Peak exercise response in relation to tissue depletion in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 1997 Dec;10(12):2807-13. — View Citation

Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81. — View Citation

Cahalin LP, Mathier MA, Semigran MJ, Dec GW, DiSalvo TG. The six-minute walk test predicts peak oxygen uptake and survival in patients with advanced heart failure. Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):325-32. — View Citation

Casanova C, Cote C, Marin JM, Pinto-Plata V, de Torres JP, Aguirre-Jaíme A, Vassaux C, Celli BR. Distance and oxygen desaturation during the 6-min walk test as predictors of long-term mortality in patients with COPD. Chest. 2008 Oct;134(4):746-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0520. Epub 2008 Jul 14. — View Citation

Casas A, Vilaro J, Rabinovich R, Mayer A, Barberà JA, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Roca J. Encouraged 6-min walking test indicates maximum sustainable exercise in COPD patients. Chest. 2005 Jul;128(1):55-61. — View Citation

Cataneo DC, Cataneo AJ. Accuracy of the stair climbing test using maximal oxygen uptake as the gold standard. J Bras Pneumol. 2007 Mar-Apr;33(2):128-33. English, Portuguese. — View Citation

Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, Casanova C, Montes de Oca M, Mendez RA, Pinto Plata V, Cabral HJ. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 4;350(10):1005-12. — View Citation

Dal Corso S, Duarte SR, Neder JA, Malaguti C, de Fuccio MB, de Castro Pereira CA, Nery LE. A step test to assess exercise-related oxygen desaturation in interstitial lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2007 Feb;29(2):330-6. Epub 2006 Oct 18. — View Citation

Dourado VZ, Antunes LC, Tanni SE, de Paiva SA, Padovani CR, Godoy I. Relationship of upper-limb and thoracic muscle strength to 6-min walk distance in COPD patients. Chest. 2006 Mar;129(3):551-7. — View Citation

Dourado VZ, Tanni SE, Vale SA, Faganello MM, Sanchez FF, Godoy I. Systemic manifestations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Bras Pneumol. 2006 Mar-Apr;32(2):161-71. Review. English, Portuguese. — View Citation

Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V, Tracy RP, McNamara R, Arnold A, Newman AB; Cardiovascular Health Study. The 6-min walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):387-98. — View Citation

Fromer L, Cooper CB. A review of the GOLD guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD. Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Aug;62(8):1219-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01807.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28. Review. — View Citation

Hadeli KO, Siegel EM, Sherrill DL, Beck KC, Enright PL. Predictors of oxygen desaturation during submaximal exercise in 8,000 patients. Chest. 2001 Jul;120(1):88-92. — View Citation

Knudson RJ, Lebowitz MD, Holberg CJ, Burrows B. Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Jun;127(6):725-34. — View Citation

Kovelis D, Segretti NO, Probst VS, Lareau SC, Brunetto AF, Pitta F. Validation of the Modified Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire and the Medical Research Council scale for use in Brazilian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Bras Pneumol. 2008 Dec;34(12):1008-18. English, Portuguese. — View Citation

Leung AS, Chan KK, Sykes K, Chan KS. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a 2-min walk test to assess exercise capacity of COPD patients. Chest. 2006 Jul;130(1):119-25. — View Citation

Mahler DA, Wells CK. Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dyspnea. Chest. 1988 Mar;93(3):580-6. — View Citation

Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J; ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-38. — View Citation

Pinto-Plata VM, Cote C, Cabral H, Taylor J, Celli BR. The 6-min walk distance: change over time and value as a predictor of survival in severe COPD. Eur Respir J. 2004 Jan;23(1):28-33. — View Citation

Pitta F, Troosters T, Spruit MA, Probst VS, Decramer M, Gosselink R. Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 1;171(9):972-7. Epub 2005 Jan 21. — View Citation

Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Buist SA, Calverley P, Fukuchi Y, Jenkins C, Rodriguez-Roisin R, van Weel C, Zielinski J; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep 15;176(6):532-55. Epub 2007 May 16. Review. — View Citation

Soler-Cataluña JJ, Sánchez-Sánchez L, Martínez-García MA, Sánchez PR, Salcedo E, Navarro M. Mid-arm muscle area is a better predictor of mortality than body mass index in COPD. Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2108-15. — View Citation

* Note: There are 23 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary First "Six Minute Step Test" Performance This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the patient will step up and down a 20cm step during six minute. The performance will be evaluated by the number of the steps. First day or second day of the protocol (random) No
Primary Second "Six Minute Step Test" Performance This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the patient will step up and down a 20cm step during six minutes. The performance will be evaluated by the number of the climbs. On the first or second day of evaluation (random), 30 minutes after the first 6MST. No
Primary Third "Six Minute Step Test" Performance This test will be conducted by the "Rater 2", the patient will step up and down a 20cm step during six minutes. The performance will be evaluated by the number of the climbs. On the third day of evaluation, seven days after the first day of evaluation. Since it was performed in the same day of the third 6MWT, the choice of the first test was random, and there was a 30 minute interval between them. No
Secondary First "Six Minute Walk Test" Distance This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. The performance will be the distance (meters)that it walk. First day or second day of the protocol (random) No
Secondary Second "Six Minute Walk Test" Distance This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. The performance will be the distance (meters)that it walk. On the first or second day of evaluation (random), 30 minutes after the first 6MWT. No
Secondary Third "Six Minute Walk Test" Distance This test will be conducted by the "Rater 2", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. The performance will be the distance (meters)that it walk. On the third day of evaluation, seven days after the first day of evaluation. Since it was performed in the same day of the third 6MST, the choice of the first test was random, and there was a 30 minute interval between them. No
Secondary "Body-Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea, Exercise Capacity" Index (BODE Index) It was evaluated only in the COPD patients. BODE index is a prognostic index used in COPD patients, it is a 0-10 scale, where lower values means better prognostic. It is composed by other commonly used evaluations tools in COPD, Forced Expiratory Volume in the First second (from spirometry); classification in the scale ranging from 0-3, Body-mass index, classification in the scale ranging from 0-1; Six-minute walk test distance, classification in the scale ranging from 0-3 and referred dyspnea, classification in the scale ranging from 0-3.
It was only used the total score (0-10)
Second day No
Secondary First "Six Minute Walk Test" Exertion Perception This test was conducted by the "Rater 1", the subject walked as far as it could in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. The Exertion Perception will be evaluated using BORG scale. This scale is a self-reported scale, which range from 0 to 10, where 0 means none exertion perception and 10 means very intense exertion perception (the highest the patient has ever felt). Lower values means that the patient feel less discomfort. First day or second day of the protocol (random) No
Secondary Second "Six Minute Walk Test" Exertion Perception This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. The Exertion Perception will be evaluated using BORG scale. This scale is a self-reported scale, which range from 0 to 10, where 0 means none exertion perception and 10 means very intense exertion perception (the highest the patient has ever felt). Lower values means that the patient feel less discomfort. First day or second day of the protocol (random), 30 minutes after the first 6MWT No
Secondary Third "Six Minute Walk Test" Exertion Perception This test will be conducted by the "Rater 2", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. The Exertion Perception will be evaluated using BORG scale. This scale is a self-reported scale, which range from 0 to 10, where 0 means none exertion perception and 10 means very intense exertion perception (the highest the patient has ever felt). Lower values means that the patient feel less discomfort. On the third day of evaluation, seven days after the first day of evaluation. Since it was performed in the same day of the third 6MST, the choice of the first test was random, and there was a 30 minute interval between them. No
Secondary First "Six Minute Step Test" Exertion Perception This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the patient will step up and down one 20cm step during six minute. The Exertion Perception will be evaluated using BORG scale. This scale is a self-reported scale, which range from 0 to 10, where 0 means none exertion perception and 10 means very intense exertion perception (the highest the patient has ever felt). Lower values means that the patient feel less discomfort. First day or second day of the protocol (random) No
Secondary Second "Six Minute Step Test" Exertion Perception This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the patient will step up and down one 20cm step during six minute.The Exertion Perception will be evaluated using BORG scale. This scale is a self-reported scale, which range from 0 to 10, where 0 means none exertion perception and 10 means very intense exertion perception (the highest the patient has ever felt). Lower values means that the patient feel less discomfort. First day or second day of the protocol (random), 30 minutes after the first 6MST No
Secondary Third "Six Minute Step Test" Exertion Perception This test will be conducted by the "Rater 2", the patient will step up down one 20cm step during six minute. The Exertion Perception will be evaluated using BORG scale. This scale is a self-reported scale, which range from 0 to 10, where 0 means none exertion perception and 10 means very intense exertion perception (the highest the patient has ever felt). Lower values means that the patient feel less discomfort. On the third day of evaluation, seven days after the first day of evaluation. Since it was performed in the same day of the third 6MWT, the choice of the first test was random, and there was a 30 minute interval between them. No
Secondary First "Six Minute Walk Test" Peripheral Oxygen Saturation This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. It will be evaluated by a pulse oxymeter. First day or second day of the protocol (random) No
Secondary Second "Six Minute Walk Test" Peripheral Oxygen Saturation This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. It will be evaluated by a pulse oxymeter. ,First day or second day of the protocol (random) 30 minutes after the first 6MWT No
Secondary Third "Six Minute Walk Test" Peripheral Oxygen Saturation This test will be conducted by the "Rater 2", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. It will be evaluated by a pulse oxymeter. On the third day of evaluation, seven days after the first day of evaluation. Since it was performed in the same day of the third 6MST, the choice of the first test was random, and there was a 30 minute interval between them. No
Secondary First "Six Minute Step Test" Peripheral Oxygen Saturation This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the patient will step up and down one 20cm step during six minute. It will be evaluated by a pulse oxymeter. First day or second day of the protocol (random) No
Secondary Second "Six Minute Step Test" Peripheral Oxygen Saturation This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the patient will step up and down one 20cm step during six minute. It will be evaluated by a pulse oxymeter . First day or second day of the protocol (random) ,30 minutes after the first 6MST No
Secondary Third "Six Minute Step Test" Peripheral Oxygen Saturation This test will be conducted by the "Rater 2", the patient will step up and down one 20cm step during six minute. It will be evaluated by a pulse oxymeter. On the third day of evaluation, seven days after the first day of evaluation. Since it was performed in the same day of the third 6MWT, the choice of the first test was random, and there was a 30 minute interval between them. No
Secondary First "Six Minute Walk Test" Heart Rate This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. It will be evaluated by a cardio monitor. First day or second day of the protocol (random) No
Secondary Second "Six Minute Walk Test" Heart Rate This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. It will be evaluated by a cardio monitor at rest and every two minutes of the test. First day or second day of the protocol (random), 30 minutes after the first 6MWT No
Secondary Third "Six Minute Walk Test" Heart Rate This test will be conducted by the "Rater 2", the subject will walk as far as it can in a 30m corridor during 6 minutes. It will be evaluated by a cardio monitor. On the third day of evaluation, seven days after the first day of evaluation. Since it was performed in the same day of the third 6MST, the choice of the first test was random, and there was a 30 minute interval between them. No
Secondary First "Six Minute Step Test" Heart Rate This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the patient will step up and down a 20cm step during six minute. It will be evaluated by a cardio monitor. First day or second day of the protocol (random) No
Secondary Second "Six Minute Step Test" Heart Rate This test will be conducted by the "Rater 1", the patient will step up and down a 20cm step during six minute. It will be evaluated by a cardio monitor. First day or second day of the protocol (random), 30 minutes after the first 6MST No
Secondary Third "Six Minute Step Test" Heart Rate This test will be conducted by the "Rater 2", the patient will step up and down a 20cm step during six minute. It will be evaluated by a cardio monitor. On the third day of evaluation, seven days after the first day of evaluation. Since it was performed in the same day of the third 6MWT, the choice of the first test was random, and there was a 30 minute interval between them. No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05102305 - A Multi-center,Prospective, OS to Evaluate the Effectiveness of 'NAC' Nebulizer Therapy in COPD (NEWEST)
Completed NCT01867762 - An Effectiveness and Safety Study of Inhaled JNJ 49095397 (RV568) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05562037 - Stepped Care vs Center-based Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation for Older Frail Adults Living in Rural MA N/A
Terminated NCT04921332 - Bright Light Therapy for Depression Symptoms in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and COPD N/A
Completed NCT03089515 - Small Airway Chronic Obstructive Disease Syndrome Following Exposure to WTC Dust N/A
Completed NCT02787863 - Clinical and Immunological Efficiency of Bacterial Vaccines at Adult Patients With Bronchopulmonary Pathology Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05552833 - Pulmonary Adaptive Responses to HIIT in COPD N/A
Recruiting NCT05835492 - A Pragmatic Real-world Multicentre Observational Research Study to Explore the Clinical and Health Economic Impact of myCOPD
Recruiting NCT05631132 - May Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation (NIV) and/or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Increase the Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Salvage in Patients With Pulmonary Diseases? N/A
Completed NCT03244137 - Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Cognitive Function in Patients With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting NCT03282526 - Volume Parameters vs Flow Parameters in Assessment of Reversibility in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease N/A
Completed NCT02546700 - A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT04446637 - Acute Bronchodilator Effects of Ipratropium/Levosalbutamol 20/50 mcg Fixed Dose Combination vs Salbutamol 100 mcg Inhaler Plus Ipratropium 20 mcg Inhalation Aerosol Free Combination in Patients With Stable COPD Phase 3
Completed NCT04535986 - A Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ensifentrine in Patients With COPD Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05865184 - Evaluation of Home-based Sensor System to Detect Health Decompensation in Elderly Patients With History of CHF or COPD
Completed NCT03256695 - Evaluate the Relationship Between Use of Albuterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler With an eModule (eMDPI) and Exacerbations in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 3
Completed NCT03295474 - Telemonitoring in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Pulse Oxymetry System.
Withdrawn NCT04042168 - Implications of Appropriate Use of Inhalers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 4
Completed NCT03414541 - Safety And Efficacy Study Of Orally Administered DS102 In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phase 2
Completed NCT02552160 - DETECT-Register DocumEnTation and Evaluation of a COPD Combination Therapy